Climate Change Strategies Report: A Case Study of Hull, Manchester and Newcastle Strategies

This report compares and contrasts the climate change strategies of Hull, Manchester, and Newcastle cities. It assesses the strengths and weaknesses of their strategies in relation to international standards. The report also discusses the commitments and actions taken by each city to address climate change.

1
CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES REPORT: A CASE STUDY OF HULL, MANCHESTER
AND NEWCASTLE STRATEGIES
By
Name
Instructor’s/Professor’s Name
Course Number
College/University’s Name
Street
Date

2
Introduction
Climate change is not only a threat to world but also one of the topmost challenges that earth is
facing today and in the future (Aldy & Pizer, 2015). Although, some parts of world are still
ignorant about climate change, the reduction in the availability of natural resources will certainly
change the manner in which the future generation will do business, learn in school, as well as the
job opportunities that will be pursued (Aguiar et al., 2018). It is thus worth noting that the quality
of life in future will be affected by changing climate impacts (Tol, 2018). In a bid to ensure that
changing climate impacts are addressed, governments, cities, organizations, individuals and
councils are coming up with holistic approaches.
It is worth noting that Manchester, Newcastle as well as Hull have come up with their own
approached to address climate change with missions of promoting sustainable development.
These cities have the knowhow that globalization as well as human population growth is swiftly
depleting resources. Therefore, the focus of this report is to compare and contrast Hull,
Manchester as well as Newcastle cities climate change strategies. Also, it assesses the strengths
and the weaknesses of the climate change strategies of three cities in association with
international standards. Besides, the EU climate change policy requires all cities to be
responsible for carbon emissions as well as to device machenisms of controlling climate change
impacts (Rayner & Jordan, 2016)
Comparing and Contrasting Hull, Newcastle and Manchester Climate Change Strategies
To begin with, Newcastle as a city has come up with a climate change strategy named
Newcastle City Council Climate Change (Mitigation) Strategy 2018 which has numerous
commitments helpful in CO2 reduction. It is worth noting that the commitments of the city
carbon emission reduction have their roots from the Nottingham Declaration in the year 2016

3
with objectives of reducing GHG (greenhouse gas) in association with the UK Climate Change
Act as well as well as Paris Climate Agreement. Although, Newcastle mitigation strategy may
not be comprehensive since it entirely depend overall world climate changes and policies, it has
the capacity of showing how the city is doing in its carbon emission mitigation (Newcastle City
Council, 2018).
On the other hand, Hull has developed a wide range of actions necessary to address the
challenges brought by climate change as well as depletion of natural resources through the
Environment and Climate Change Strategy developed by ECC SAG. The climate change
strategy build on ONE HULL Climate Change Strategy of 2007 with the major objective of
minisising of the city’s environmental impact, reducing causes of global climate change as well
as adapting climate future changes. Through achieving these responsibilities, Hull city strategy
will not only minimise economic, social as well as environmental effects but also take advantage
of resultant positive opportunities that will rise from carbon emissions reduction and economic
growth. Notably, Hull’s strategy acknowledges that climate change is not only a responsibility of
the city but also understands that it is a global problem and issue therefore it has responsibility of
its own emission which is also a contributor to the global problem.
Manchester on its part is considered a full time player in limiting climate change effects both at
the city level and at the global level. Manchester is not only thriving, zero waste, climate resilient
but also zero carbon city where all public, private, residents as well as third sector organizations
are active contributors and benefactors of the success of the city. Therefore, city’s objectives
which were built during 2010 to 2016 and are continuing to progress over medium, short as well
long-term are; resilience to climate change, sustainable jobs and economy, zero carbon emission,

4
healthy communities and culture change which has projected a remarkable graph by 2050 as
shown below (Manchester Climate Change Agency, 2016).
Achievement of Manchester’s objectives towards climate change requires a comprehensive
strategy as well as adoption of several practices by the city. First, attracting investments,
innovations as well as business growth for low carbon emissions, as well as environmental
friendly’ services and goods. Notably, order for Manchester to ensure it promotes this objective
then it needs to develop as well as export globally the right ‘spaces’ and resources to innovate.
Secondly, Manchester strategy tends to invest on young people. Manchester clarifies that
investors, business leaders as well as 2050 politicians are at college, university and schools today
(Manchester Climate Change Agency, 2016). Therefore, the global outlook, skills and
knowledge they develop will be key to planet’s success and their own success. Manchester
supports and promotes young education towards low carbon emission to ensure that its residents
and students have full knowledge and skills required climate resilience.
After becoming a signatory in 2008 to Covenant of Mayors, Newcastle commitment to CO2
emissions reduction in the local authority area was at 21% from 2005 levels to the 2015 levels.

5
The local authority areas of target are road transport which reduced from 4.85million tCO2 in
2005 to 4.05 million tCO2 in 2015; industrial and commercial buildings which reduced from 7.95
million tCO2 in 2005 to 5.39 million tCO2 in 2015 and domestic buildings which reduced from
6.68 million tCO2 in 2005 to 4.40 million tCO2 in 2015 as shown in table 1 below.
Source: Newcastle Case study
Although, Newcastle has shown a 29% drop in CO2 emission between 2005 and 2015 due to
improvements in energy performance of the city’s housing stock and increase in the usage of
renewable energy like electrical power, the city still needs more mitigations since the transport as
well as the energy future of UK is uncertain. First, the trend of increase in renewable energy
(electricity generation) usage is expected to continue for decades as people tend to move from
gas or coal energy usage thereby reducing CO2 emission per unit of consumed electricity. Also,
the UK is considered by Newcastle city to be increasingly focusing providing low carbon heat
instead of the present approach which uses natural gas predominantly. Furthermore, the increase
in electric vehicles usage will certainly reduce the amount of emissions especially in road

6
transport as a sector (Newcastle City Council, 2018). However, this strategy is still doubt since
the benefit will be maximized depending how electricity is generated as a source of energy for
electric vehicles (Watts at el., 2015). Generally, the Newcastle mitigation is faced with these
substantial uncertainties since they will impact how both national as well as city’s emissions
change over a span of time.
Since Newcastle achieved 29% CO2 emission reduction from 2005 to 2015 it is road transport,
domestic buildings as well as industrial and commercial sectors, the city’s current strategy is a
long-term one committed to achieving 100% clean energy in its road transport as well as
buildings by 2050. The influence in the CO2 in emissions in Newcastle change due to several
factors. First, the Local Plan of the city is set to ensure that new industrial, new housing as well
as commercial buildings are delivered to conform to the forecast population increase in the city
which will add more energy consumption in Newcastle (Newcastle City Council, 2018).
Furthermore, it is projected that road vehicles are becoming more efficient thereby reducing CO2
emissions for every distance covered. According to Nienhueser and Qiu (2016), a shift towards
usage of electric vehicles is likely to provide a lot of contribution towards reducing CO2
emissions.
First, reducing emissions from the operations of Newcastle’s Council, reducing emissions from
council offices, as well as reducing emissions from buildings such as; care homes and schools
among others. Secondly, Newcastle City Council working as well as supporting large
organizations and stakeholders like NHS and Universities which have also shown commitment
of reducing CO2 emissions through their established corporate commitments (Newcastle City
Council, 2018). Thirdly, the UK is increasingly putting more focus on energy efficiency
measures on industries which Newcastle promote by raising awareness as well as behavior

7
change campaign (Urry, 2015). Moreover, Newcastle council strategy is focused on street-
lighting replacement, council fleet replacement, improving efficiency of houses, and embracing
commercial PV programme among others.
Notably, Hull in known to be adapting its targets from the national targets due to unavailability
of data for Hull since 2005 with a baseline taken from 2008 Climate Change Act, Hull success
measures are established from three major key issues (ECC SAG, 2010). The measures are
climate change future adaptation, natural resources sustainable use, and reduction of carbon
dioxide emission as mitigation. To ensure that carbon dioxide emissions target of reduction is
achieved, Hull established carbon emission process of reporting in 2011. Also, using the 2005
baseline, Hull reduces carbon emissions by an approximate of 23.6 percent to 30% by 2015.
Besides, Hull projects a reduction of carbon emission by 34 percent to an estimate of 45% by
next year (2020).
Furthermore, using future climate change adaption as measure of success, Hull came up with a
number of strategies. Firstly, producing Adaption Risk Assessment Tool as well as identifying
major areas of assessment in 2011. Secondly, Producing Adaption Strategy and Action Plan for
the city in 2012 as well as adaption embedded ONE HULL working policies. Moreover, natural
resources sustainable use is another viable measure of target which is also in line with European
ecology (Lindner et al., 2010). First, in 2012 Hull held sustainable Procurement Conference
which there was sharing of best practice in Hull city. Secondly, the city holds from 2011 to 2020
inter-business events to ensure that it links design, innovation as well as production businesses
for providing or manufacturing services with least possible resources. Lastly, the city has
projected by 2020 for organisations and businesses not only to adopt but also to have sustainable
procurement processes.

8
Moreover, Hull strategy takes into consideration UK government’s carbon reduction 2020 targets
such as The UK Renewable Energy Strategy, UK Low Carbon Transport-A Greener Future, UK
Low Carbon Transition Plan, as well as the UK Low Carbon Industrial Strategy. Notably, Hull
adopts the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan which has five major themes (ECC SAG, 2010).
Firstly protecting the society from immediate climate change risks and preparation for the future.
Also, a low carbon building of the UK as well as limiting the future climate change severity
through new international climate agreements. Lastly, supporting businesses, communities as
well as individuals to effectively play their part with respect to climate change and sustainable
development.
Notably, Hull emission scenarios such as low scenario at 2oC, medium emission at 3.2oC and
high emission at 4oC depends on global mitigation efforts with regards to greenhouse gases being
emitted to the atmosphere.Therefore, it worth noting that, future changes in climate are likely to
have a lot of implications on earth (Blöschl et al., 2017). Therefore, as Hull move towards hotter
and dryer summers and warmer and wetter winters will certainly have an impact on animals and
plants habitats as well as increase in demands of goods as well as services. Therefore, Hull as a
city potential issues are; health and well being, biodiversity, flood risk, environmental services,
housing and buildings, industry and commerce, and awareness.

9
Figure 1 below shows how carbon emission is broken-down by activity in Hull.
Figure 1: Breakdown of Carbon Footprint by consumption Activity in Hull.
From the chart is worth noting that household consumption activities result in high carbon
dioxide emissions with domestic land and fuel consumption being at 13.1%, car fuel at 7.5%, gas
and electricity distribution at 9.9% and transport services at 6.2%.

10
Therefore strategically, Hull’s policies tend to raise and promote awareness by providing support
for business and homes, promoting as well as improving energy efficiency in new and existing
buildings (ECC SAG, 2010). Also, according to Araújo et al. (2011), use the natural environment
as a mechanism of mitigating and adapting climate change. Improve quality of life through
reducing carbon emission in transport sector as well as improve social outcome and health
through promotion of cycling, walking, public transport and alternative use of technologies and
fuels. Lastly, enhance efficiency as well as energy security through promoting renewable as well
as low carbon produced and used in Hull city (Affolderbach, Schulz, & Braun, 2018).
On the other hand, Manchester’s supports it strategy by enabling as incentivising institutional
investment. The city has already put forward investment incentives such as the installation of the
low carbon energy systems in institutions like Manchester Metropolitan at Birley Field Campus
University, Manchester City’s Football Academy, as well as in Town Hall and Central Library
transformations. Besides, organisations that show commitment to low carbon emission are
rewarded with reputational benefits and reduced energy bills.
Moreover, Manchester thematic actions outlines it initiatives with respect to energy, buildings,
transport, resources and waste, food, and green spaces as well as waterways. First, buildings
especially existing ones are poised to be retrofitted to ensure that their energy requirements are
minimised. Also, Manchester energy strategy is to take control, influence and ownership of
energy system of the city, businesses and residents through replacing the gas biogas as well as
hydrogen (Manchester Climate Change Agency, 2016). Besides, the strategy is poised to adapt
new infrastructure so that it can withstand high temperatures as well as extreme rainfall.
Furthermore, the strategy is poised to transform on the way to 2050 through new working
arrangements, digital communication technologies, well-planned as well as new developments

11
which will reduce need to travel while supporting running, cycling, green routes and safe.
Generally, Hull strategy can be considered to be more comprehensive as it caters across
sustainable usage of resources, future climate change adaption and reduction in carbon dioxide
emission. On the other hand, Manchester strategy is also a comprehensive strategy with details
how it is committed towards resilience to climate change, sustainable jobs and economy, zero
carbon emission, healthy communities and culture change especially through supporting young
people in schools, universities and colleges as well as its residents and organization. However,
Newcastle’s mitigation majorly deals with CO2 emission reduction only within road transport,
industrial and domestic buildings thereby a lot of rooms to areas like air transport, rail transport
and young people involvement at large.
Weaknesses and Strengths of Newcastle, Manchester and Hull Climate Change Strategies
A strength, Manchester’s strategy is resilient as it is committed towards resilience to climate
change, sustainable jobs and economy, zero carbon emission, healthy communities and culture
change especially through supporting young people in schools, universities and colleges as well
as its residents and organization. Besides, the strategy takes into consideration not only it’s
residents, organizations and businesses but also provides room for its young generation to
acquire skills and knowledge to support future success of businesses, organizations and political
class. On the other hand, Hull strategy’s strength is that takes into consideration UK
government’s carbon reduction 2020 targets such as The UK Renewable Energy Strategy, UK
Low Carbon Transport-A Greener Future, UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, as well as the UK
Low Carbon Industrial Strategy which are well planned strategies. Also, Newcastle’ strength is
majorly depended universal reduction of CO2 emission through electric vehicles and national
policies.

12
On weaknesses, Newcastle’s strategy does not include CO2 emissions associated with rail travel
as well as air travel. Besides, Newcastle council’s strategy is largely depended on national
strategies rather than being much specific to emissions around the city and challenges that city
faces due to global. The 2050 100% clean energy can only be achieved universally since it will
mean that everyone Newcastle will be having electric vehicles which may not be possible by
2050 (Affolderbach, Schulz, & Braun, 2018). Besides, if the City is still targeting only a
reduction of 50% CO2 emission by 2030 which is a difference of 15 years from 2015 then it is
not viable to achieve 100% clean transition from 2030 2050 which has 20 years difference.
Furthermore, the target is majorly depend how much ready the UK, Europe and the entire world
is ready and willing to transform wholly to electric vehicle usage by 2050.
Furthermore, Hull strategy’s has probability of loopholes left especially due to unavailability of
data retrieved from Hull in relation to climate change before the year 2005. This gives a set back
since the level of confidence for predicting as well as projecting future climate changes may not
be comprehensive therefore provide high chances of errors in future projection. Although,
Manchester’s may not have much weaknesses but it is also facing uncertainties since climate
change is a global issue that requires participation and involvement of worldwide parties,
corporations, people and governments (Goldstein, 2016).
Conclusion
In conclusion, climate change and depletion of natural resources is a global issue that requires
governments, cities, organizations, individuals and councils to come up with holistic approaches
to address the their impacts. Manchester, Newcastle as well as Hull City are developing
strategies to address climate change with missions of promoting sustainable development. For
instance, with a target of 974 ktCO2, Newcastle has several climate change strategies to meet its

13
target by 2050 which are majorly taken from projects and programmes within the city. On the
other hand, Hull’s strategy tend to raise and promote awareness by providing support for
business and homes, promoting as well as improving energy efficiency in new and existing
buildings. On the other hand, Manchester’s thematic actions outlines it initiatives with respect to
energy, buildings, transport, resources and waste, food, and green spaces as well as waterways.
Bibliography

14
Affolderbach, J., Schulz, C. and Braun, B., 2018. Green Building as Urban Climate Change
Strategy. In Green Building Transitions (pp. 3-14). Springer, Cham.
Aguiar, F.C., Bentz, J., Silva, J.M., Fonseca, A.L., Swart, R., Santos, F.D. and Penha-Lopes, G.,
2018. Adaptation to climate change at local level in Europe: an overview. Environmental Science
& Policy, 86, pp.38-63: doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.010
Aldy, J.E. and Pizer, W.A., 2015. The competitiveness impacts of climate change mitigation
policies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(4), pp.565-
595: doi/abs/10.1086/683305
Araújo, M.B., Alagador, D., Cabeza, M., Nogués‐Bravo, D. and Thuiller, W., 2011. Climate
change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology letters, 14(5), pp.484-492:
doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01610.x
Blöschl, G., Hall, J., Parajka, J., Perdigão, R.A., Merz, B., Arheimer, B., Aronica, G.T.,
Bilibashi, A., Bonacci, O., Borga, M. and Čanjevac, I., 2017. Changing climate shifts timing of
European floods. Science, 357(6351), pp.588-590: DOI: 10.1126/science.aan250
ECC SAG (2010). Kingston Upon Hull climate Change 2010-2020: A low carbon framework for
Hull. Hull, pp.1-38.
Goldstein, J.S., 2016. Climate change as a global security issue. Journal of Global Security
Studies, 1(1), pp.95-98: doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogv010
Manchester Climate Change Agency (2016). Manchester Climate Change Strategy 2017-50.
Manchester: Manchester Climate Change Agency, pp.1-40.

15
Newcastle City Council (2018). Climate Change (Mitigation) Strategy 2018. Newcastle:
Newcastle City Council, pp.1-9.
Nienhueser, I.A. and Qiu, Y., 2016. Economic and environmental impacts of providing
renewable energy for electric vehicle charging–A choice experiment study. Applied energy, 180,
pp.256-268: doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.121
Lindner, M., Maroschek, M., Netherer, S., Kremer, A., Barbati, A., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Seidl, R.,
Delzon, S., Corona, P., Kolström, M. and Lexer, M.J., 2010. Climate change impacts, adaptive
capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest ecology and
management, 259(4), pp.698-709: doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
Luque-Ayala, A., Bulkeley, H. and Marvin, S., 2018. The amenable city-region: the symbolic
rise and the relative decline of Greater Manchester’s low carbon commitments, 2006–17.
In Rethinking Urban Transitions (pp. 91-106). Routledge.
Patrício, J., Little, S., Mazik, K., Papadopoulou, K.N., Smith, C.J., Teixeira, H., Hoffmann, H.,
Uyarra, M.C., Solaun, O., Zenetos, A. and Kaboglu, G., 2016. European marine biodiversity
monitoring networks: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Frontiers in Marine
Science, 3, p.161.
Rayner, T. and Jordan, A., 2016. Climate Change Policy in the European Union. In Oxford
Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science.
Tol, R.S., 2018. The economic impacts of climate change. Review of Environmental Economics
and Policy, 12(1), pp.4-25: doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex027

16
Urry, J., 2015. Climate change and society. In Why the social sciences matter (pp. 45-59).
Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Watts, N., Adger, W.N., Agnolucci, P., Blackstock, J., Byass, P., Cai, W., Chaytor, S., Colbourn,
T., Collins, M., Cooper, A. and Cox, P.M., 2015. Health and climate change: policy responses to
protect public health. The Lancet, 386(10006), pp.1861-1914: doi.org/10.1016/S0140-
6736(15)60854-6
Watts, G., Battarbee, R.W., Bloomfield, J.P., Crossman, J., Daccache, A., Durance, I., Elliott,
J.A., Garner, G., Hannaford, J., Hannah, D.M. and Hess, T., 2015. Climate change and water in
the UK–past changes and future prospects. Progress in Physical Geography, 39(1), pp.6-28:
doi.org/10.1177/0309133314542957