Ethical Issues in Health and Social Sciences Essay

1
Ethical Issues in Health and Social Sciences Essay
Name:
Institution:
Date:

2
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................................3
Human Rights and Restraint of mentally ill and disabled patients....................................3
Ethical Dilemma and Restraints.........................................................................................5
Ethical principles and theory in practice............................................................................6
Reflexive Insights of value and Morals..............................................................................8
Conclusion.........................................................................................................................9
References.......................................................................................................................10

3
Introduction
The term "ethics," which derives from the Greek word "ethos," which meaning
"personal integrity," refers to the qualities that make a person or an action morally
correct, true, reasonable, and honest. People who adhere to the broad guidelines for
their profession usually use this expression. An ethical lawyer or therapist wouldn't want
to take advantage of the uneasy state of such a participant or accused. When a
scenario occurs and a group of individuals can decide on the best course of action, an
ethical quandary arises. The word "moral" derives from the Latin word "mores," which
means "habits," and refers to the practice of upholding moral and ethical norms that are
founded on conceptions of good and evil. It is not physical or obvious; rather, it is
cognitive (Brendel, 2021). When compared to many medical professions, mental health
and disability are associated with a wide range of challenging ethical issues. Potential
conflicts, therapeutic misconceptions, issues with constraints, insecurity, abuse,
difficulties, and other concerns are all influenced by these factors. One of the most
important ethical concerns in the field of psychological health and impairments is how
these people are restrained. Restraints can be physically detrimental to patients and
staff, therefore their frequent and broad use in mental health treatment has created
many ethical and legal concerns (Yusuf, 2022). Therefore, the current study will look at
many viewpoints, legitimate implications of the regulation of people with such a mental
health issue or disability, and reflective insight of worth and morality.
Human Rights and Restraint of mentally ill and disabled
patients
Civil rights guarantee the inalienable right to liberty, freedom, independence from
coercion and punishment, expression privileges, the ability to live, work, and go to
education, among other things. All people have the chance to exercise their rights,
without distinction. Although while handling and treating mentally ill patients issues,
some of the fundamental rights standards are neglected. The restriction of mobility, the
inability to work, and confinement to a certain location represent some of the most
alarming ethical occurrences in this domain. Since the advent of medical advances,

4
confinement has been used to practice medicine with disabilities or mental illnesses.
However, it is currently regarded as one of the challenging issues in inpatient care and
has traditionally been viewed as a social conundrum and philosophical debate
(Edwards, 2020). The three restraints are applied to restrict those who have serious
mental illnesses, to protect life, and reduce rage and aggression.
This confinement and management method, which itself was designed as from
start to protect patients from danger either to themselves or others, is linked to a
number of potential dangers. For those with disabilities and mental issues, a number of
forms of restraint that were already employed. Physical restraint describes the physical
interactions between individuals when compulsion is used constructively towards the
opponent, whether to limit liberty of movement or to stop someone from acting in an
unfavorable way (Edwards, 2020).
The process of using medications to wield power is a component of chemical
control. The usage of equipment is implied by physiological constraint. Examples
include utilising specifically designed mittens in acute settings that used a hardboard or
belt to keep a psychologically ill or physically impaired individual from leaving their seat,
or using bedrails to prevent an individual from arising from his bed. Institutions designed
to limit peoples choices range of motion, such as closed door meetings, baffle locks,
etc., are considered external restrictions. Emotional restraint entails repeatedly telling
someone not to do something, that accomplishing what they must do is forbidden, or
that it would be too dangerous (Yusuf, 2022).
A governing agency that directs health practitioners is the Mental Health
Capacity Act of 2005. It implies that medical professionals, caregivers, staff members,
etc. may constrain clients to stimulate care if the care is necessary; the limit utilised is
directly inversely proportionate to the patient's level of aversion to treatments.
Additionally, in order to achieve the intended result, the sort of limitation used has to be
the least disruptive one (Yusuf, 2022). Within those cases, it is essential to enforce both
the physical and chemical limitations. The choice of therapeutic options is at dispute,
while there are associated rewards and hazards. The authority to forbid the patient from
receiving treatment for their disorder under the Mental Health Act of 1983. Some other
way about, however, is invalid. The MHA does not provide us the authority to forbid any