Ask a question to Desklib · AI bot
Deep Understanding of the Reviewed Literature
3 Pages1111 Words471 Views
Added on 2019-09-16
BookmarkShareRelated Documents
PRP4002Thesis DissertationPRP4002 Thesis DissertationMarking criteria**Please read in conjunction with the assignment Guidelines & Advice**Marking criteriaA*, A+, A, A- (>70%, Distinction)Outstanding work that is exceptionally good in most of the following ways:The abstract is a succinct, beautifully flowing, well-balanced snapshot of the review.There is clear evidence of extensive and relevant reading, and this far exceeds key papers suggested by supervisor.The theme chosen for the literature review provides a solid foundation upon which to base an MSc level dissertation.The author has originality of exposition, which evidences a deep understanding of the reviewed literature. The literature review is progressive, with an easy flow achieved between paragraphs, irrespective of whether concepts described are related ordisparate.The author creates a novel, logical, and succinct synthesis of existing sources of literature.The analysis of synthesised literature results in an insightful exploration of the presented literature.The reviewed literature is subject to an advanced critical evaluation that interprets the value of the body of literature as it stands, and the resultantrequirement for further study.The literature review is written in a manner befitting a postgraduate student, without error in expression, grammar, and punctuation.The document is perfectly formatted and stylised in accordance with APA guidelines (including use of appropriate language, in-text citations & references).B+, B, B- (69.5-60%, Merit)Highly competent work that is very good in most of the following ways:The abstract provides a comprehensive, well-written summary of the review.There is evidence of comprehensive, relevant reading, and this exceeds key papers suggested by supervisor.The theme chosen for the literature review provides a good foundation upon which to base an MSc level dissertation.The author is mostly original in exposition, and this evidences a good understanding of the reviewed literature. The literature review is structured well, with good flow achieved betweenparagraphs, and good links forged between related and disparate concepts.1
