Deep Understanding of the Reviewed Literature

Added on - 16 Sep 2019

  • 3

    pages

  • 1111

    words

  • 119

    views

  • 0

    downloads

Showing pages 1 to 1 of 3 pages
PRP4002Thesis DissertationPRP4002 Thesis DissertationMarking criteria**Please read in conjunction with the assignment Guidelines & Advice**Marking criteriaA*, A+, A, A- (>70%, Distinction)Outstanding work that is exceptionally good in most of the following ways:The abstract is a succinct, beautifully flowing, well-balanced snapshot ofthe review.There is clear evidence of extensive and relevant reading, and this farexceeds key papers suggested by supervisor.The theme chosen for the literature review provides a solid foundationupon which to base an MSc level dissertation.The author has originality of exposition, which evidences a deepunderstanding of the reviewed literature.The literature review is progressive, with an easy flow achieved betweenparagraphs, irrespective of whether concepts described are relatedordisparate.The author creates a novel, logical, and succinctsynthesisof existingsources of literature.Theanalysisof synthesised literature results in an insightful explorationof the presented literature.The reviewed literature is subject to an advancedcritical evaluationthatinterprets the value of the body of literature as it stands, and the resultantrequirement for further study.The literature review is written in a manner befitting a postgraduatestudent, without error in expression, grammar, and punctuation.The document is perfectly formatted and stylised in accordance with APAguidelines (including use of appropriate language, in-text citations &references).B+, B, B- (69.5-60%, Merit)Highly competent work that is very good in most of the following ways:The abstract provides a comprehensive, well-written summary of thereview.There is evidence of comprehensive, relevant reading, and this exceedskey papers suggested by supervisor.The theme chosen for the literature review provides a good foundationupon which to base an MSc level dissertation.The author is mostly original in exposition, and this evidences a goodunderstanding of the reviewed literature.The literature review is structured well, with good flow achieved betweenparagraphs, and good links forged between related and disparateconcepts.1