Levels of Analysis Framework: Understanding Human Behavior

1. The levels of analysis framework: understanding human behavior
Every individual behaves according to his own perspectives which are not comprehended
rationally by the other human. Passer, Smith, and Norris developed the level of analysis
framework in 1916. This leads to better perceptual comprehension of certain activities a human
performs and this further provides the scope for a better life.
(Passer, Smith and Norris, 2016) assert that psychology’s six prime frames of references can be
broadly classified into three levels of analysis.
The biological level of analysis considers the processing of the brain and the role of genetics as
the major influencers of behavior (Passer, M.W., Smith, R.E., & Norris, K. 2016). This ascribes
corporal interpretation of an individual’s behavior. The major factors shaping human behavior
according to the biological level of analysis are structures of the brain, hormonal activity, and
eugenics. This level of analysis has helped the neuroscientists to decipher how neurons and
different structures of the brain shaped civilizations (Young, 2015).
The psychological level of analysis considers the cognitive or the mental processing of our
general surroundings according to prior experiences or predispositions (Kim, 2015). This kind
of analysis looks out for a reason leading to a behavior within the cognitive map of our
personality (Passer, M.W., Smith, R.E., & Norris, K. 2016). This level of analysis holds great
importance in the research associated with the study of adolescent behavior, early childhood
behaviors with the help of experimental settings, neuro-imaging, and interviews.
The environmental level of analysis is based on the role of environment and socio-cultural
factors in constructing a human’s behavior (Passer, M.W., Smith, R.E., & Norris, K. 2016). This
lets us comprehend human behavior based on four major principles. These are: a sense of

belongingness, the existence of social self for every human, the influence of culture and
resistance towards change.
2. Levels of analysis framework: reflection on my experiences of studying and learning.
Visiting any university at Australia provides with the opportunity to interact with students and
faculty from across the globe and cultures. Joining this course at the university transformed my
overall perception towards the way I saw the world till now. In lecture topic 1.3, Tim Griffin
discussed ‘Psychological Perspectives for understanding human behavior’. This further helped
me answer questions like evaluating people’s behavior, the rationale causing such kind of
behavior. I learned that answers to all these questions help us to have a better and positive
understanding of other culture.
I joined the university after a long vacation. Vacation implies not very disciplined approach
toward life. I had lost track of the schedule I used to follow prior to the vacation. After so many
years of following a strict schedule, now I had the choice of not spending the time in a
productive manner. I found that very exciting. When the academic session commenced at the
university, I had mixed feelings. I was enthusiastic about pursuing a course that I had dreamt of
since long, but once again following a time-bound schedule was discouraging me. The challenge
was to foresee positive and long-term outcomes.
I found difficult to interact with students from different cultural and ethnic backgrounds. I have
been a shy and introvert person throughout. I had certain inhibitions and could not attend the
social discussions related to the unit. I did not express my opinions and acted judgmental on
many occasions. As we progressed through the course gradually I started getting answers to my
own questions related to self-doubt. I had started to follow a schedule by then. Soon I realized