logo

Negligent Advice and Untrue Information: Legal Analysis

Analyzing a case study involving Magnolia's expansion plans for her cooking business and the legal issues surrounding it.

11 Pages2733 Words28 Views
   

Added on  2023-01-19

About This Document

This document provides a legal analysis of two issues: whether Magnolia can sue Laura for providing negligent advice, and whether Jake can sue the Council for providing untrue information. It also discusses the elements of negligence and the duty of care in these situations. The document further analyzes two contract law issues: whether there is a binding contract between Donald and Margarita, and whether Jeff is obligated to provide services to Donald. Finally, it examines the concept of promissory estoppel in the context of a lease agreement between Donald and Nacho, and discusses the issue of unconscionable conduct in a loan agreement between Com Bank and Donald's parents.

Negligent Advice and Untrue Information: Legal Analysis

Analyzing a case study involving Magnolia's expansion plans for her cooking business and the legal issues surrounding it.

   Added on 2023-01-19

ShareRelated Documents
1
Title Page
Name of the student
Student ID
Negligent Advice and Untrue Information: Legal Analysis_1
2
Contents
Question 1...................................................................................................................................................3
Issue A.........................................................................................................................................................3
Relevant Law...........................................................................................................................................3
Application of Law..................................................................................................................................4
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................4
Issue B.........................................................................................................................................................4
Relevant Law...........................................................................................................................................5
Application of Law..................................................................................................................................5
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................6
Question 2...................................................................................................................................................6
Issue A.........................................................................................................................................................6
Relevant Law...........................................................................................................................................6
Application of Law..................................................................................................................................6
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................7
Issue B.........................................................................................................................................................7
Relevant Law...........................................................................................................................................7
Application of Law..................................................................................................................................7
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................7
Issue c..........................................................................................................................................................7
Relevant law............................................................................................................................................7
Application..............................................................................................................................................8
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................8
Issue D.........................................................................................................................................................8
Law..........................................................................................................................................................8
Application..............................................................................................................................................8
Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................9
Reference List...........................................................................................................................................10
Negligent Advice and Untrue Information: Legal Analysis_2
3
Question 1
Issue A
Whether Magnolia can sue Laura for providing negligent advice?
Relevant Law
In Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932], every defendant is duty bound to provide protection to the
plaintiff from his actions and omissions. This law of negligence has evolved with the passage of
time and now includes statements and advices from experts. (Gibson, 2018)
The law of negligent statements simply establishes that any person who is making any
professional statement or furnishing advice with the familiarity that the claimant is relying on his
statements, then, the defendant is obligated to ensure that no harm must be caused to the claimant
because of his advice provided there is proximity amid the advisor and the relying party. The
duty not to give negligent advices is found in Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
(1964). Thus, to impose the legal duty on the adviser (defendant), the main elements:
i. Duty of care – The advisor when giving advice is under the duty to ensure that the
plaintiff who is relying and acting on the advice should not suffer with any harm
(Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co [1951]. There are few elements which must be
present before the duty of care is imposed:
a. In Mutual Life and Citizens Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt (1968), the duty only exist
when the advisor is duly aware that the claimant would rely on the advice before
undertaking any further actions or omissions.
b. That there should be some sort of connection amid the parties which implies that
the advice will impact the plaintiff directly (San Sebastian Pty Ltd V Minister
Adminstering The Enviromental Planning And Assessment Act (1986).
c. That it is necessary that the advisor can reasonably foresee the presence of the
plaintiff (Caparo Industries PLC v Dickman [1990]
d. That the advisor is controlling the acts of the plaintiff by furnishing the advice
(Hill v Van Erp - [1997])
ii. Violation – In Karrawirra Wines v State Bank of South Australia [1994] when the
advisor does not cater the advice as per the level of heed that is desired in the
situation, then, there is violation.
Negligent Advice and Untrue Information: Legal Analysis_3
4
iii. Damages – When the claimant suffers with injuries because of the advice then
damages are caused provide the loss is reasonable anticipated.
Application of Law
Magnolia started her cooking business (‘Thermo-delicious’) and wants to expand her business.
She met Laura Smartypants, an accountant/financial adviser. Laura agreed that she will prepare a
business/ expansion plan for her.
Now, Laura owns a duty of care towards Magnolia as Luara is aware that Magnolia is relying on
her advice before undertaking expansion plan. Laura is in the dominant position and is sharing
the relationship of proximity.
Laura suggested that her position is very sound that she can scrounge money. However, Laura
admitted that the report prepared by her was no correct as the already existing liabilities are not
taken into account and the costs of the establishment was also not considered.. She also admitted
that relied on her tarot cards.
So, the level of care that is expected from Laura fall short considering the fact that Laura is
aware Magnolia is relying on her advice before seeking expansion plan.
Magnolia acted on the advice of Laura. She borrowed $69000 from Usurer’s Credit in July 2018.
She signed a 5 year lease, purchased thermomixers and hired a designer fir her webpage..
Because of the wrong advice the business of Magnolia failed and she suffer losses. The losses
are the direct result of the wrong advice.
So, Laura is negligent.
Conclusion
It is thus concluded that Laura has furnished negligent statements and face the consequences of
the losses that are faced by Magnolia.
Issue B
Whether Jake can sue the Council for providing untrue information?
Relevant Law
The law of negligence owns a duty of heed on every defendant towards the claimant who is the
neighbor of the defendant. The duty of care is also to be furnished by the government authorities
and the local councils (Capital & Counties plc v Hampshire County Council [1997].
The elements which required to be prove includes:
Negligent Advice and Untrue Information: Legal Analysis_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Liability of Auditor and Law of Agency
|10
|2572
|434

(PDF) Business law Assignment Help
|10
|2492
|484

Case Studies on Business and Corporation Law
|10
|2869
|74

Application of Law - Assignment PDF
|9
|2475
|88

Legal Analysis of Negligent Misstatement and Vicarious Liability in Ellen's Case
|7
|1910
|190

Duty of Care and Negligence in Dandenong Council Case
|8
|1840
|404