Sustainability Systems and Procedures

Civil Engineering
First Name Last Name
Institution

2
PART A
Question 1. Relevant systems and procedures
The Greenhouse Challenge Plus Program, an initiative by the Australian government.
The Greenhouse Challenge Plus Program lapsed by in June 2009. The key components of the
Greenhouse Challenge Plus Program, discharge stock detailing and helping organizations in
lessening their greenhouse emanations, have been supplanted by the National Greenhouse and
Energy Reporting Systems (NGERS). The Greenhouse Challenge was a joint activity between
the Australian Government and industry to: - Encourage ozone-harming substance reduction; -
Improve ozone-depleting substance administration; - Improve discharges estimation and
observing; and - Strengthen government/industry data sharing ("The Australian Greenhouse
Challenge", 2016). Beginning as a totally intentional program in 1995, the plan changes to an
industry association program with deliberate, motivator based and necessary participation in
2004, with some industry gatherings required to be individuals. Participation was expansive,
including enormous and little open and private associations from pretty much every business
area. Members consented to arrangements with the Government that gave a system to
undertaking and covering activities to diminish greenhouse discharges (Sullivan, 2015).
Challenge Plus conveyed an extended industry association program that coordinated greenhouse
issues into business basic leadership, further diminishing ozone-harming substance discharges,
and quickening the take-up of energy productivity. The Governments Greenhouse Friendly
Program and Generator Efficiency Standards were coordinated into Challenge Plus. The program
included discharges in key zones over the Australian economy, specifically power age, the
aluminum business, coordinated clinker, and concrete supplies and oil and gas extraction.
Inclusion was likewise broad in the mining and assembling areas. Individuals revealed
discharges decreases in excess of 21 million tons of CO2-e in 2002 because of moves made as a
major aspect of the program. The seven most noteworthy sorts of activities related with these
emanations decreases, every one of which brought about investment funds more than 1 million
tons CO2-e, were: coal crease methane seepage; vitality the board and reviews; fuel exchanging;
heater redesign/improvement; flare decrease; cogeneration; and procedure gas relief. The
program stopped at 30 June 2009 as per the Wilkins Review proposals.
ISO 14001:1996 Environmental management systems life cycle analyses

3
ISO 14001 is the universal standard that specifies necessities for a convincing ecological
administration framework. It gives a system that an organization can pursue, as opposed to
building up environmental implementation fundamentals (Bridgen & Helm, 2018). Some portion
of the ISO 14000 group of norms on natural administration. Incorporating it with other
management frameworks models, most normally ISO 9001, can further support with
accomplishing hierarchical aims. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
demonstrates an environmental administration outline as "a feature of the administration
framework used to oversee ecological perspectives, satisfy consistence commitments, and
address dangers and openings." The scheme in the ISO 14001 standard can be applied inside a
plan-do-check-act (PDCA) way to deal with persistent improvement. ISO 14001:1996 has since
been revised to ISO 14001:2004. ISO 14001:2004 sets out prerequisites for a natural
management structure to empower an association to develop and update a strategy and goals that
consider legitimate necessities and necessities to which the association buys in, as well as
information on critical ecological perspectives. The association distinguishes those ecological
perspectives as those it can control and those it can impact. It does not itself state the explicit
criteria for ecological execution. To paraphrase it, click the Quill It button on the right.
Summary outline of two systems and procedures applicable to the office in the case study.
a. Recycling
Provide separate collection bins designated for specific waste types such as plastic, tins,
paper, and glass. If employees bring their meals such as lunch in reusable food packs and
the office provides reusable cutlery, cups, and plates, landfill wastes are significantly
reduced. Employees can be encouraged to drink tap water rather than bottled water. This
can entail the installation of water treatment alternatives to provide safe drinking water at
the workplace. The office can install, for instance, a water filter. Statistically, 76% of
office waste consists of paper. Given the scenario presented, paper wastage is likely
worse. The office can draft a policy whereby if at all a print out has to be obtained, all
printers in use must be set to draft double-sided, narrow margins and black and white.
Also, the printing of documents not for use or relevance to the organization should be
discouraged. Additionally, procurement staff should focus on environmentally friendly,
reusable products such as refillable pens, recycled toilet paper, dishcloths, towels as well
as environmentally friendly cleaning products (Russel, 2017). Recycle refrigeration

4
equipment rather than buying a new at a replacement for a broken refrigerator, recycle
print cartridges such as quick toners and lamp recycles.
b. Energy
The heating and cooling systems should be replaced or upgraded to smart heating and
cooling network systems based on real-time and data and time of use. The heating and
cooling systems should be made to operate only during office hours rather than 24 hours
a day throughout. In this way, energy savings in terms of cost shall be realized besides
reducing energy demand through efficiency in energy utilization. Office machines such
as computers by It staff should be set in screen saver mode or go to sleep mode when not
in use. At the end of office hours, the machines should be turned of the power point.
Question 2. Sustainability at coca cola
Coca-Cola boasts of an indispensable corporate responsibility and sustainability culture.
This culture forms a guide to its investments runs and decisions. The company employs
three strategic objectives in realizing sustainability within the organization namely:
minimizing the impact on the environment, promoting health and wellness, and giving
back to society. In promoting health and wellness, the company encourages healthy and
active living, use of evidence-based science, informing with transparency as well as
responsible marketing. In minimizing the impact on the environment, Coca-Cola does
sustainable sourcing, reduction in production wastes and energy, and water utility,
continuously reduce their Greenhouse gases emissions, and improved packaging through
increase recycling and recovery measures (Mokhov & Ryabukhin, 2018).
Question 3. Australian legislation, regulation, and codes to environmental and
sustainability issues for the office in the case study.
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)— the
domestic condition legislation of Australia — makes it an offense for any person to make
a move that is likely to have a significant impact on issues enshrined in the Act, except if
they have the approval of the Australian condition. Ensured issues will be matters of
natural national hugeness just like the Commonwealth land earth. The EPBC Act requires
any individual who may plan to make a move that will likely have a significant impact on
a law-secured issue to refer their task to the Australian condition clergyman to determine
whether an endorsement is required (Bates, 2012). On the off chance that an endorsement