Decolonisation of Academic Curriculum: A Comparative Study of Hountondji and Ngugi

Theory of Education

1
Hountondji and Ngugi have a strong conception of how authentic African knowledge
should be brought into University studies
Education changes with the government. The people in powers always change the curriculum
and the way in which education is provided. In Africa most of the states have been colonised
for years and they have added the flavours of colonisation in the educational structure. It is
seen that higher level educations are highly influenced by the colonial powers (Amoko,
2010). In this the original knowledge of the culture of Africa did not get spread to the
students. It is due to this people are losing the knowledge about their own culture and are
adopting the culture of the western worlds. This is having impact on the social orientation as
well. It is critical that authentic African knowledge is brought into the university level studies
as it is critical for improvement in the way students will also understand. Already in the age
of globalisation, people of Africa is facing challenges related to the safeguarding their culture
(Kaya & Seleti, 2014). After the liberalisation of Africa and its people from centuries of
racially discriminatory colonial rule and domination has far-reaching impact on the
educational practices and thoughts (Doyo, 2012).
Both Hountondji and Ngugi have a different idea about the decolonisation of the academic
curriculum. Hountondji believes that there is a need of change in the educational discourse
within Africa which will also require a philosophical framework which has a respect for the
diversity, acknowledges lived experiences of the people in the past and at the same time
challenges the hegemony of the western form of the universal knowledge. Hountondji has a
strong opinion against the illusion that all the women and men in the communal societies
speak with one voice and the shares the same thoughts about the fundamental challenges
(Agawu, 2014). He has a critical view in this regards can be viewed as a pathways to the
higher education where it is argued that philosophy empowers voiceless communities where
the cultural aspects needs to be added in the educational framework (Mawere, 2011). This is
essential because it gives a particular identity to the people. On the other hand Ngugi had a
belief that teaching philosophy at the lower levels of the education i.e. at the schooling level.
He argues that people have faced a long history of colonisation which has impacted culture
and language of the people who got colonised as they got synergized with the present and
hence facilitating better understanding and emancipating towards providing a school
curriculum that is decolonised. He believed that promoting ideologies at lower levels of the
educational structure respectively seems to concur to as the epistemicides also known as
process of killing and appropriation of other’s knowledge which drives hand in gloves with

2
linguicides trying to kill the language of the people that aims to get colonised (Masolo, 2017).
This also reflects the fact that Ngugi is positivist as the positivism theory also suggests that
social forces such as colonisation has coercive control over the people.
Hountondji have a view that culture is of no importance unless it is practiced hence
governments need to make sure that they have in built the culture in their youngster and
hence it is critical that university level curriculum (Rodrigues, 2011). This is also because
unless the values and practices of any culture are not debated, it is difficult for any society to
make sure that they have a plan for their development. He promotes the psychology of our
ways of doing things in every aspect of the society and this education plays a most critical
role. This shows that Hountondji is having a view that is more inclined towards Critical
Realism as the real world seemed to be different than what actually it is. The educational
system looked like as if it is more inclined towards African philosophy but actually it is not.
On the contrary Ngugi has a view point that not inculcating own cultural knowledge and
downloading the known of the European societies in the mind will not allow the holistic
development of any individuals and in this regards it is critical that the teachings starts at the
lower levels of the educational backgrounds. Giving such cultural knowledge at higher stage
of the life is of no use (Makhubela, 2016). This is not highly supporting the critical realism as
it does not explains that how unobservable structures are forcing people to adopt the western
educational structure. This states that Ngugi is a positivist as the positivism theory suggests
that certain knowledge is based on the natural phenomena and their relations and properties.
Positivism theory also explains the point of Ngugi that valid knowledge can be found only in
the case when something has a reason hence gaining knowledge that is based on the
reasonable thinking derived from cultures.
Hountondji has a view that by adding the materials related to African culture in the higher
education one will be able to learn things in a better manner about their own history, about
their distinct identity, values that is carried in the society and the communication that can
build a better society. It is usually seen that in the societies that do not adopt their own
communicational value always seems to lose their grounds and they often lose trust within
the society (Mawere, 2015). This is not good for the society in the long term. This is because
the people with bigger resources will be able to have more power in the society which they
derive from their colonial mind-sets. Since in Africa there are many tribal that even does not
have access to the higher education. This is because most of them have had a background of
the cultural attachment and when they reach to the higher education they feel that they are