This document provides an empirical analysis of S&P500 returns using RiskMetrics and Historical Simulation methods. It includes plots of daily returns, histogram, autocorrelations, and VaRs. The document also tests the validity of 1% and 5% VaRs using a binomial test.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
3. Empirical Use S&P500 returns for September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018. (1 point) Plot the daily returns, and the histogram of daily returns and PDF of Normal distribution. (1 point) Plot of daily returns 01-09-17 17-09-17 03-10-17 19-10-17 04-11-17 20-11-17 06-12-17 22-12-17 07-01-18 23-01-18 08-02-18 24-02-18 12-03-18 28-03-18 13-04-18 29-04-18 15-05-18 31-05-18 16-06-18 02-07-18 18-07-18 03-08-18 19-08-18 04-09-18 20-09-18 06-10-18 22-10-18 07-11-18 23-11-18 09-12-18 25-12-18 -6.00% -4.00% -2.00% 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% Daily Returns Days Returns
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Histogram of daily returns -0.04-0.03-0.02-0.0100.010.020.030.040.05 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Histogram of Daily S&P 500 Returns and the Normal Distribution September 1, 2017 - December 31, 2018 Returns Probability distribution Plot autocorrelations, 1 to 100 lags. (1 point) 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Lag order Autocorrelation of Daily Returns
Plot squared return autocorrelation. (1 point) 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 Lag order Autocorrelation of Squared Daily Returns 3.1.For each day, from September 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, calculate the 10- day 1% VaRs for S&P500 returns using the following methods: (a) RiskMetrics, that is, normal distribution with an exponential smoother on variance using the weight, λ=0.94, and (b) Historical Simulation. Use a 250-day moving sample. Compute the 10-day VaR from 1-day VaR just by multiplying by square root of 10. Plot the VaRs. (10 points) Calculations are shown in attached excel file.
05-09-17 22-09-17 09-10-17 26-10-17 12-11-17 29-11-17 16-12-17 02-01-18 19-01-18 05-02-18 22-02-18 11-03-18 28-03-18 14-04-18 01-05-18 18-05-18 04-06-18 21-06-18 08-07-18 25-07-18 11-08-18 28-08-18 14-09-18 01-10-18 18-10-18 04-11-18 21-11-18 08-12-18 25-12-18 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 Dates VaR 3.2.Assume that each day a trader has a 10-day, 1% dollar VaR limit of $100,000. Assume that the trader each day invests the maximum amount possible in the S&P 500 between September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Construct daily P&Ls of this position for 10- day 1% VAR using (a) RiskMetrics and (b) Historical Simulation. Plot them. (10 points) What do you observe? What do you conclude? a)Value A= $100,000 Return per year R= 1-0.94 = 0.06 = 6% Confidence level c = 99% Volatility v = 1.20% Trading days T = 252 We start by evaluating the present volatility given by;
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Volatility (t+1) V=√(0.94∗v2)+0.06∗(R T)2 (Chen, 2012) Substituting we have; volatility(t+1)=√(0.94∗0.0122)+0.06∗(0.06 252) 2 =0.01163≈1.163% Inverse probabilityp=NORM.S.INV(1−c)=−2.3264 We therefore obtain VaR by the formula; VaR=−p∗V ¿−(−2.3264∗0.001163) ¿2.7066% 10 day VaR =2.7066%∗√10 = 8.559% Inverse in VaR =e−0.08559=0.9180 VaR $ =100,000∗(1−0.9180)=$82,000 b)Historical simulation(Paul Embrechts, 2013) A = $100,000 10 day VaR = 8.559% Mean =A∗(R∗10 T)+A ¿100,000(0.09∗10 250)+100,000=$100,360
024681012 0.00% 200.00% 400.00% 600.00% 800.00% 1000.00% 1200.00% Daily Returns Days Returns Historical simulation results to a higher value as compared to RiskMetrics. Thus, RiskMetrics is the best method to adopt. 3.3.Test the validity of 1% VaR and 5% VaR for (a) RiskMetrics and (b) Historical Simulation for the same time period using binomial test (and 5% p-value significance level). What do you conclude? a) Solved in excel file. Its observed that 1% VaR yields a larger value as compared to 5% VaR. This indicates that 5% VaR yields acceptable values as compared to 1% VaR. Thus, adopt 5% VaR.
References Chen, C. W., Gerlach, R., Hwang, B. B., & McAleer, M. (2012). Forecasting Value-at-Risk using nonlinear regression quantiles and the intra-day range.International Journal of Forecasting,28(3), 557- 574. Paul Embrechts, C. K. (2013).Modelling Extremal Events: for Insurance and Finance.Springer Science & Business Media.