5) Critique of a Qualitative Study Group PowerPoint Presentation (PPT): 20% Due: Module 5: Wk 10Qualitative research is an important research method for nurses to be familiar with for evidence-based practice. The purpose of this assignment is to give a framework for critiquing a qualitative study. oPlease work within the group assigned and fully address the following topics as they apply in an 8-10 content slide PPT, not including title and reference page. Use 3rd person. Each group has an assigned qualitative study posted within their group Discussion Board to assess. Groups will be created approximately by week 6. oOne member from each group (the group leader) will submit the final group PPT in 2 places: The assignment submission link in module 5 and on Module 5’s Discussion Board. oOnce PPT is posted on Discussion Board, please take time to look at your colleagues work and feel free to comment on their presentation's relevance to nursing practice as well as their presentations content and visual appeal. This is a non-graded discussion boardoSubmissions handed in late will be subject to a 5 point per day lateness penalty, unless prior arrangements have been made between the student and the instructor.This is a group project; however, each student will receive an individual grade based on one’s peer review, as well as the final Power Point Presentation that is posted. Please read rubric carefullyGuideline questions:Address these topics/areasin the 8-10 slide PPP clearly and concisely. Review textbook especially Chap 14Identify the different areas of the study and critique it according to these guidelines:Title: Is the title of reasonable length? How do you know? Clear? Are the study concepts mentioned in the title? Does the title suggest the population under investigation? If so who?Abstract: Is purpose clearly, concisely stated? Is there a brief summary of the results? Introduction: Was the problem statement clearly stated? Is the problem and its importanceto nursing discussed and backed by logical argumentsLiterature Review: Is there a literature review? Are the researcher’s literature sources: primary? secondary? current (within the past 5 years of the article’s publication)? Is the review merely a summary of past work or does it critically appraise and compare the key studies (noting strength and weaknesses)Methods: Is there a specific design, tradition, or method of qualitative research is used? Critique if this is an appropriate method to use for this topic. Describe the data collection 8-11-16 mkm1
method. Is the method of data collection consistent with study design? How was informed consent gathered? Protection of participants? Samples: What sampling strategies were utilized? Does the researcher give reasons for theirselection? What is the setting of the study? Is the setting appropriate for the study?Analysis: Describe the researcher’s data analysis. Any bias noted? Did any themes or theories emerge and if so what were they?Results/Findings:? Briefly describe the results (outcomes) of the study? Does the researcher address the results in relationship to all research questions and/or hypotheses stated in the article? Are limitations to the study discussed, do you agree? Are there other limitations not mentioned that could skew the resultsSummary Assessment: Clinical relevance: After reading this study, describe understandingof the topic of the study. Does it seem trustworthy? What does this study contribute to nursing practice? Based on your critique do you believe this is a valid study? Is there evidence of transferability.Grading Rubric for Group PPT Presentation:CATEGORY100-90 (A)14.30 – 12.85 pts.89-82 Pts. (B)12.70 – 11.70 pts.81-74 Pts. (C)11.57 - 10.57 pts.73-0 Pts. (D-F)10.42 – 0 ptsEarned pointsAmount of Information8-10 content slidesAll 7 topic areas areaddressed with 8-10content slides not including title and ref slideAll 7 topic areas are addressed. However, there aresome answers to major questions missing within the 8-10 content slidesOnly 5-6 topic areas are fully addressed. Missing answers tomany of the major questions asked.Slides either succeeds or fails inmeeting the required slide limit. Information is not always clear.Less than 5 topic areas are fully addressed. More than 10 slides or less than 8 slides used. Information given is scanty leaving the reader with many questions of what the authors were trying to conveyQuality of InformationInformation is clearly and concisely stated with supporting evidence and/or examples.Information flows Information is clear. Some of the major points are missing supportingevidence and/or examples.Slides have a Information is vague or confusing. Some info or topics missing. No detailsand/or examples given. Slides are Information is given incorrectly; onlyanswers the questions regarding the study 8-11-16 mkm2
Found this document preview useful?
Patients Perception of Nurses Skilllg...
Assignment on Master of Nursinglg...
Assignment on Nurses Knowledge of Pharmacologylg...
Evidence Based Nursing Research Assignment PDFlg...
Critical Review Assignment in MGMT 650: A Step-by-Step Guidelg...
MGMT 650 Statistics for Managerial Decision Making Assignmentlg...