Internet Censorship: IT, Government, and Freedom of Expression

Verified

Added on  2022/08/11

|3
|351
|38
Homework Assignment
AI Summary
This assignment delves into the critical issue of internet censorship, focusing on the roles of Information Technology (IT) companies and the government in regulating online content. It argues that IT companies should define content restrictions within their terms and conditions, and monitor or delete inappropriate content, while also considering age-appropriateness. The government's role involves enacting policies to regulate content shared online, specifying permissible content and consequences for violations. However, the assignment emphasizes that such policies must not infringe upon constitutional rights, particularly freedom of expression. It suggests censorship should target content promoting crime, violence, racism, or extremism, without limiting the ability of journalists or activists to share informative content. The conclusion advocates for a collaborative approach between IT companies and the government to implement censorship responsibly, ensuring the protection of fundamental rights.
Document Page
SOCIAL IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Student’s Name
Institution Affiliation
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
SOCIAL IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Internet censorship is one of the most debated about information technology. The
endeavor aims at suppressing information viewed or published on the internet. The censorship of
internet content is an important process that needs to be implemented through a collaborative
approach.
To begin with the buck for internet content censorship stops with information technology
companies. This should be done through a clear stipulation of content that should not be shared
in the terms and condition section. Additionally, it can also be done through monitoring of all
content and hiding or deleting posts that are deemed inappropriate for public consumption.
Finally, they should also enforce strategies to ensure visibility and accessibility of content for
different age brackets. The assumption behind this argument is that content that may be deemed
inappropriate for a particular age group may be appropriate for another. This is particularly
applicable on social media platforms.
Additionally, the government has a crucial role to play in the regulation of content shared
on social media. In this regards, it needs to enact various policies to regulate the content that is
shared online. Such policies should outline content that should be shared online by individuals
and organizations. In addition, it should also specify the measures that should be taken in case of
any violations. However, an internet censorship policy should not deprive individuals of their
freedom of expression provided for in the constitution. Such a policy should only limit content
that advocates for crime, violence, racism, extremism and other vices that can cause havoc in the
society. It should not limit the ability of investigative journalist or social activists to share
educative or informative content.
Document Page
In conclusion, internet censorship should carried out by Information technology
companies and the government through regulations and policies. It should however be done
without violating constitutional rights such as the freedom of expression.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 3
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]