1CRITICAL ANALYSIS Response to Question1...............................................................................................................2 Response to Question 2..............................................................................................................3 References..................................................................................................................................4
2CRITICAL ANALYSIS Response to Question1 The note at the end of chapter denotes the existence of the poems in the novel ‘Fifteen Dogs’ as being written for each dog for the fifteen dogs in work. The poems are all formulated in the voice of Prince, who can be named as the protagonist, for he was the only one in the narrative able to grasp the essence of the gift of language and emotions granted to them. When Alexis address in the note that he created “Poem for a Dog’, he was denoting the technique of Oulipo when he has utilized. The method of Oulipo is used to denote the meaning of the words used through the sounds they make rather than the text used. The poem used for Bella shows clearly the depiction of the usage of Oulipo, and readers can easily understand the clear indication of Bella’s name in the poetry denoted to her by Prince. “Beyond the hills, a master is who knows our secret names. withbelland bones, he’ll call us home, winter, fall, or spring.”(Alexis, pp. 29) The use of the word ‘bell’ shows the poem is dedicated to her as she was among one who had appreciated and thanked Prince for evoking in them the sense of their existence. Here, the meaning of the poem can denote Bell’s friendship with Athena, who had been carrying her due to her small size. It also indicates the nature of dogs by being pleased with their natural state of being called to think about having masters. It shows the inherent characteristics of being loyal. The poem adds to the process of the narrative where they were granted the wishes, but the Gods, both Apollo, and Hermes interfered.
3CRITICAL ANALYSIS Response to Question 2 The characteristic feature displayed by Atticus in the novel is the portrayal of a character by Alexis, which demeans the worth of the meaning of life and happiness. He refuses to understand or accept the gift which has been granted to them and even leads other dogs against the use of the gift. However, amidst the plot development, we can observe that the placed wager between Gods to test the importance of language and emotion developed by humans has lost its existence. As the wager was to see the worth of the language to emote created by humans, one can place the characters of the dogs as representing the kind of human psychology they represent. Atticus is one of the bigger dogs with intimidating nature and can be overpowered by only two others from the pack, Majnoun, and Prince (Alexis). He eliminates both of them and takes the place of the leader of the pack. One can see that Atticus, though he dies a very natural death which Alexis uses to convey to the readers his unworthiness due to his greed. He was not killed in any elaborate planning which he had used while killing Majnoun and Bella. It can be taken as the interpretation of the loss of happiness. Nevertheless, Atticus gains power with his witty method can be assessed as attaining happiness for it fulfilled his wish of making the pack adhere to the nature of dogness (Alexis).Therelationshipbetweenhappinessandpowerisshowntobeinversely proportional because the characters who try to control their fate slose their happiness.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser