The Adversarial Structure

Running head: CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note

1CASE STUDY
Problem 1 critically think regarding the adversarial structure
Ray Finklelstein “The Adversarial structure as well. As the Search for truth” (2011) 37 (1)
Monarch University Law Review 135-144.
a) The question that involves is that as per Ray Finkelstein what extreme obstacle is
concerning the adversarial structure to attain truth.
We all are associated to adversarial structure therefore we should implement case
administration in addition to that in enhance manner to the combination of adversarial
and inquisitorial structure. The parties to the proceedings have self-concern that is getting
in the path. The legal practitioners desire to achieve cases as well as settle disagreement
that is arising in between the parties and not focus on searching the actual truth.
Furthermore dealing with the evidence rest on the self-concern of the parties; the deficit
of description of truth.
b) What are his proposals of reformation?
Firstly the character of adjudicating authority for gathering evidence at the stage of trial
of case is highly inactive. Therefore the reformation to establish them in the active
manner. Secondly initiation of examination at the pre-trail stage by court of law. The

2CASE STUDY
proposal forwarded is the expansion of the process of disposition is that court must have
authority in proper cases to employ the autonomous examiner for questioning witnesses
before the trial proceedings. Thirdly the role played by the legal practitioner in its essence
according to Professor is the lawyer should reveal to court of law regarding the presence
of material proof especially if the same is bias to client for correcting any misconceptions
that evolve from the testimony of the witness and to questioning them in the method that
target to expose the actual truth. Fourthly regarding the privy of the legal professionals it
is proposed that that provide the adjudicating authority the discretionary power to accept
the privileged proof wherein the concern of the contesting parties need. The balancing
examination is conducted in the cases that engage privilege of public interest as well as
create even more sensible in the perspective of the privilege of legal profession. The
expert witness move to the German structure the expert is employed by court expert
discourse their observation not targeting the party however to court in complete manner.
The transformation of the affirmative obligation to aid court and not reasonable that it
cannot exist to court.
c) Why Professor Finkelstein disapprove with English Appellate Court in the case of Yuill
v. Yuill [1945] 1 All ER 183?
It is fact that the adjudicating authority who is connectively reluctant must progress
cautiously in asking the witness at the stage of trial especially where the intervention of
judge can disturb from the path of questioning that is improving in on veracity. However
according to the professor that judge must essentially defer to the counsel simply due to
the fat that it might intervene with the approaches that is implemented by the counsel in
proceeding the factual concern.

3CASE STUDY
It has been submitted by Finkelstein that the adjudicating authority interfere might aid in
searching the actual fact by breaking down the movement of questioning as well as
throwing the strategies that is adopted by lawyers perhaps to evade topics or answers.
Barrister drops their training of thought or adjudicating authority may withdraw from
authority of the solution of the issue will obtain. Then the question arise as do you have
faith on judges. If the adjudicating authority get highly engaged in the process of
questioning it will withdraw the unbiased picture of judge. Nevertheless no issue how
firm you endeavor you cannot be impartial fully.
D) Should the civil suit be fact that is geared as suggested by Finkelstein?
It is submitted that although some of the points raised by Finkelstein are significant they
appears to be far-fetched as well as unattainable. The role of the lawyer is to settle
disagreement as well as to attain best probable impact on behalf of their client. This
facilitates safeguard for the clients as well as provides concentration in lawyers. Thus
being possessed with the searching the truth may be distracting in addition to that pull out
cases. Thus as enumerated in the reading the fact is generally the side effect the case in
any manner.
d) What blame could be created of the reform proposals suggested by Finkelstein?
The privilege of the legal profession transform it in any manner would affect adversely in
any association between the solicitors and clients as well as I held that it may obstruct the
finding of truth somewhat than provide assistance.
The adjudicatory authority in court of law desire more authority one is highest to another.
Problem 3- What is the role of the junior lawyer?

4CASE STUDY
You appointed as lawyer in the city that is middle sized practicing on the issue on behalf
of the established client, the client facilitates the infrastructural assistance to the mining
functioning. The client and one more identical corporation agreed a joint venture
agreement to facilitate accommodation as well as continuing accommodation assistance
at the big centralized Queensland mine. The joint venture and the client has effectively
achieve the tender of the agreement about six months before in addition to that are in
initial stage of delivering, supplying along with that fitting accommodation that is
prefabricated to the location. Therefore as per the convention it was responsibility of the
partner to facilitate the lodgings that need to be imported from China. The initial slab of
the acco0modation has conveyed to the location. The miner remain dissatisfied. It has
provide the notice to the joint ventures’ in pursuance to the agreement that the lodging is
lacking in various critical zones. It is claimed by the partner that the defects are negligible
as well as in pursuance to the joint venture arrangement could be viewed as the servicing
and/or maintenance both of them are the obligation of the consumer. The consumer has
opportunity relating to joint venture arrangement as well as the avenues as per the
convention along with miner for the purpose of executing the agreement in his own
liberty entirely.
What is you thinking in this regard?
On whom should I act – the client – what is reason for initiating action – is there exist
any legitimate agreement? Do there exist valid agreement
The reason for initiating action require the existence of valid agreement. Secondly there
should be violation of the terms and conditions as enumerated in the agreement by the

5CASE STUDY
parties to the contract. As resulting the breach, damage had been sustained by the
aggrieved party due to the misconduct of other.
Therefore we must consider regarding whether the party is in unbearable place of
authority establishing exposure to the potential misuse of authority. In this situation if any
manner of disagreement evolves the fiduciary responsibility as well as duties that are
implied in reasonable faith might be observed to present irrespective of the fact that the
distinct parties not have change their minds regarding the issues at the time of
constructing joint venture agreement in which they are parties.
We must think about limitation of time – agreement- 6 years as per Section 10
The consumer code as per Section 18 misleading and false behavior – commerce or trade
causing harm
Part B the experienced associate and you who is liable for the consumer who are having
assembly. She expressed that the counsel has instructed her the agreement of jlint venture
has infringed the fiduciary obligation in between the parties in addition to that she would
prefer commencing structure that is drawn up by putting allegation that infringement of
the fiduciary obligation as well as pleading cancellation of the arrangement. Then what is
opinion. A) Yes as per your expression. Did you assist the Lions or the Suns? B) Are the
joint venture agreement fiduciaries C) I prefer the heels wherein do anyone get them? E)
Can you put forward the intimation of advice of the counsel? Some mixture of above
Option D if there exist fiduciary obligation, there require to exist adequate proof or
probable to exist concerning all factors od the considerable portion of legislation to be
establish. The substantive legislation provides the factors of the reason of initiating
action.

6CASE STUDY
Option E- the intimation of advice of the counsel would be significant in addition to that
the factual aspects so that they could identified the timeline along with that guarantee it
does not come outside the period of limitation. For contract there must be existence of
period of six years in pursuance of Section 10.
Problem 5- more pre-litigation
In the year 16 January, 2018 you look the novel client namely Mr. Ted Rickshaw.
Rickshaw who is about 56 year an aged individual who has investigated in the year 23
October, 2017 with the disease lung cancer. Rickshaw who is nonsmoker alleges his
disease arrives from the vulnerability to cigarette smoking as cadet journalist along with
Courier mail in initial 1980s. It appears that the newsrooms only operate at the time with
the considerable cloud of the tobacco smoking that is circulating from the colleague
journalist. He desires to view in case he can able to claim damages from the previous
workers. For the purpose of argument that is put forward it is presumed that the
significant place of working schemes of damages do not implemented. I PRESUME
THAT IMPLIES I HAVE TO APPLY PIPA.
PIPA shield the personal damages that excludes work related or motor vehicle harms.
a) What reason of initiating action can be pleaded?
b) The common legislation of negligence for the activity to be conveyed to the opposite
parties on the grounds of act of negligence it relied upon the conception of basic
element that constituting negligence that is obligation to take care that the opposite
party that is Courier Mail hold to the party who is initiating proceedings that is
Rickshaw. In the case of personal harm or injury the plaintiff might create the

7CASE STUDY
infringement of obligation to take care by establishing that the method in which the
peril of harm orb injury eventuated that had been foreseeable in reasonable manner
In addition to that the opposite party in the case did not conduct as the prudent individual
would have act in such similar situation. Therefore in this particular circumstances the
Courier mail may have foreseen that reasonable person in under obligation to do that
operating the atmosphere that is filled up with tobacco smoking may create disease of
lung cancer. Therefore I present that Rickshaw may miscarries on the particular point in
late 1980s , the individuals are not conscious of the adverse impact of harm that cause
due to tobacco smoking on lungs as well as enhance significant is the actual concern of
the individual who are passive smoker. The plaintiff in this case should prove that the
injury that is sustained by him was occur due to the infringement of obligation that is
owed by defendant. Here in the particular case Rickshaw have to establish that he is not
the active smoker or any friends or family who smoked in his nearby along with that he
also have to establish that disease is not projecting to the family members.
c) The primary step require to be adopted prior to the initiation of the proceedings
d) The claimant should provide the intimation of allegation to the respondent within the
reasonable specified period after the occurrence of harm. The triggers of the
procedure of negotiation as well as mandatory conferencing which should be
concluded prior to the commencement of suit.
e) The responsibility of the claimant is to provide intimation in the specified manner as
entail in Section 9(1).

8CASE STUDY
f) The time limit is nine years from injury or nine months from symptoms or one month
post instructing the legal practitioner to claim compensation as per Section 9(3)
Section 31 of the extension owing to personal harm.
g) The responsibility to facilitate information
h) The obligation of the respondent is to response within the period of one month form
the opposite party is appropriate respondent or not in pursuance to section 10(1).
Determine as to whether the applicant has accumulated with the obligation to
facilitate information as per Section 27.
Problem 4
Hope Pty Ltd enter in the agreement with the costume hiring organization “Props,
party and play” to facilitate fancy costumes for the Christmas party of Hope’s staff. In
the intimation that was addressed to Hope on 23rd November 2010 the firm approve
on the telephonic arrangement with Mr. D Spare for the purpose of providing fancy
costumes. The intimation involve the date in which the fancy dress was necessary as
well as diverse categories and quantum of costumes. The aggregate expense was $ 8,
500. Spare was in the position of recreational manager on behalf of Hope. Props,
Party and Play was the name of trading for Mr. Columbine. The party occurs, the
costumes was conveyed and then the same was return and the party refuse to make
payment. In the heated conversation over telephone that took place on 12 February,
2011 it was indicated by Spare to Columbine that Hope was not under the obligation
to pay as fancy dress were bare rags, lame as well as the vampire dress foe
department of litigation made them appear as cartoon penguins.

9CASE STUDY
At present Columbine is your consumer. He disagreed that the costumes that are
supplied was not of expected quality. He wrote the intimation of demand to Hope in
February, 2011 and also in March, 2011. He then miss the tracking of the issue and
recently the accountant acquainted him of the secured debt.
What actions can initiated by Columbine?
The resin for initiation action for violation of contractual terms require the
enforceable agreement, the violation of terms, injury impacted from violation.
The enforceable agreement is to facilitate fancy costumes in exchange for $ 8, 500
that was confirmed on 23rd February, 2010, the letter enumerates the quantum and
category of costumes needed. The violation of term is not making payment the
damage that impact is defeat of earnings. The time limitation is six years as per
Section 10 of Contract as well as loss of earnings and damage to property.
What pre-litigation action can be adopted by Columbine?
The claimant should provide the intimation of claim to respondent within specified
period post injury. The triggers to procedure of compulsory conferencing and
negotiation should be concluded prior to commencement of litigation.
The responsibility of applicant is to provide notice in specific manner. The tile limit is
nine months from harm or none months from symptoms or one months after directing
the legal practitioner to claim compensation for harm and extension of same because
of
Personal harm

10CASE STUDY
In accordance to Section 22 the obligation of respondent to response within one
month that the respondent is appropriate respondent or not as per Section 10.
Indication as to whether the applicant compiled with obligation.
Compulsory conferencing generally six months post claim notice as per Section 36.
The parties are free to dispense with the compulsory conferencing by arrangement as
per Section 36(4)
Seven days before the parties should exchange outstanding documentation as per
Section 37.
The lawyers should put signature to readiness certificate that indicates that
preparation has complied by lawyer in expectation of trial that implies all report,
evidence, statement of witness that implemented at trial to establish reason for
initiating action have accumulated and delivered to opposite party (Section 37(2)