Assignment on Summative 2022

Running head: SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT
Summative 2
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT1
Introduction- The World Health Organisation (WHO) has provided a definition for
the term health as a condition that encompasses comprehensive mental, physical, and social
wellbeing and is not simply associated to the non-appearance of illness or infirmity. This
definition had been proposed by the WHO in the year 1948 (Macintyre 2018). The
aforementioned definition demonstrates consistency with the biopsychosocial model realted
to health, which takes into consideration the psychological, physiological, and social
influences about health and disease, and the connections between the aforestated factors
(Lehman, David and Gruber 2017). Typically the context in which a person resides holds
great prominence for the quality of life and health status of the person. This essay will
elaborate on the concept of health and illness based on three different perspectives, and will
also elucidate the different models of health.
Discussion- In recent years, it has been recognised that health can be maintained at an
optimal state not only through the improvement and implementation of science, but also
through an intelligent lifestyle and efforts of the person and the wider community. Therefore,
the principal determinants of health comprise of the economic and social environment, in
addition to the physical environment and the individual behaviour and characteristic of the
person (Adler and Stead 2015). Key factors that have gained attention in recent years as
major health influencers are namely, income and social status, education, working condition,
coping skills, health practices, biology and genetics, social support, gender, and culture.
Ottawa charter also describes health as a resource that is imperative for regular life, and does
not necessarily refer to the object of living (Larkin 2013).
Taking into consideration this perspective, health can be defined as a means of living
well, which in turn emphasises on the correlation between health and involvement in the
community. One major reproach of the view can be accredited to it being unrealistic in
nature, owing to the fact that the perspective considers most individuals unhealthy most of

SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT2
the time. Only few individuals are expected to have complete social, physical and emotional
wellbeing always, thus making this perspective counterproductive and unhelpful. Moreover,
the perspective also fails to assess the temporary episodes of illness, and neither considers the
ever increasing proportion of patients who are affected with disabilities and chronic diseases.
It can also be argued that placing an emphasis on complete health as a prime objective results
in overmedicalisation of the community. Another new definition of health had been proposed
where health referred to the capability to self-manage and adapt, and encompassed the
proficiency of adapting to the circumstances as a major step of attaining optimal health and
wellbeing (Guillemin et al. 2017). This perspective also took into consideration different
subjective elements, and needs of each individual. However, one major drawback is that the
perspective is individualistic and does not consider the determinants of health.
As mentioned in Ottawa Charter, health promotion refers to the procedure of enabling
individuals to increase their influence over, and to enhance their health. With the aim of
reaching a complete social, mental, and physical wellbeing, a person must have the capability
of identifying and realising aspirations, satisfy demands, and cope with the changing
environment (Naidoo and Wills 2016). Therefore, health is considered as an everyday
resource and is a positive concept that emphasises on personal and social resources. While
the biomedical model is in use since the 19th century, it refers to health as a freedom from
pain, defect or disease, and focuses principally on physical processes like physiology,
biochemistry, and pathology (Yuill, Crinson and Duncan 2010). Individual subjectivity or
social factors are not taken into consideration. However, the biopsychosocial model reflects
illness development through the multifaceted interaction of psychological, biological, and
social factors. The major types of health promotion model are namely, ecological models,
social cognitive theory, transtheoretical model, and the health belief model (Murdaugh,
Parsons and Pender 2018).