Activity Based Costing System for Cost Computation and Profitability Analysis
Verified
Added on 2023/06/12
|7
|774
|72
AI Summary
This article discusses the use of Activity Based Costing (ABC) system for cost computation and profitability analysis. It includes traditional cost based computations, ABC costing system, P&L statements, and benefits and limitations of ABC costing.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
ACCOUNTING STUDENT ID: [Pick the date]
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Question 1 Traditional cost based computations for the two models are summarised below. Question 2 The activity drivers cost computation is indicated below.
Costing of the two models as per ABC costing system is carried out below.
Question 3 As the mark up needed to arrive at selling price is 20%, hence unit advance system selling price is (1+ (20/100))*890.93 = $1,069.12 P&L statement assuming traditional costing price P&L statement assuming ABC costing price The comparison of the profitability of operations in the above two cases provides the answer to the strange behaviour of the foreign buyer. Considering that at the current selling price for the advance system , the company is actually making a loss, it is clear that the foreign buyer would not get more competitive quote since assuming similar costs, the selling price offered by other players would be higher. Also, in this case, overheads have been underapplied to advance model leading to higher costs estimates for the basic model making its price uncompetitive in the market (Damodaran, 2015).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Question 4 One of the issues leading to mismatch between the actual and applied overhead is the choice regarding the cost method which may be inappropriate as in the current case. Another issue is the limited accuracy of the ABC method as it would be difficult to expect 100% accuracy from this method as breaking down of activities into smaller activities and finding cost drivers is limited to practical levels (Northington, 2015). The measures for dealing with the issue at hand are outlined as follows (Parrino and Kidwell, 2014). The firms should make a transition to ABC based costing system from the traditional costing as the latter leads to incorrect allocation of overheads. The product price must be linked to accurate costing and also the prices offered by competitors. The linking of prices to competitors can enable the company to make up for any under-costing or over-costing. The deviation of the product pricing of the company from competitors price must be analysed as this could be the result of inaccurate allocation and hence once identified, it can be rectified. Question 5 Main benefits of ABC costing are enumerated as follows (Petty et. al., 2015). The pricing decisions are improved since the underlying costing of the products undergoes an improvement. The decision making by the management improves especially when decisions pertain to the most profitable product lines, decisions regarding production outsourcing or special order acceptance in case of spare capacity. As a result, ABC is not just a costing system but a strategic system which enables that the firm remains competitive in the market. There are certain key limitations of activity based costing as enumerated below (Brealey, Myers and Allen, 2014).
This costing system has higher complexity and hence difficult to implement. There is requirement of consultants and trained manpower for the implementation of this system in a firm along with resource requirement. This makes it difficult for small firms to make the switch to ABC system. The implementation of ABC system in itself may not improve decision making at the firm level. This is because managers face difficulties with usage of the information under this costing and hence have to be trained in this regards. Further, issues are still possible thus limiting the positive impacts.
References Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C. and Allen, F. (2014)Principles of corporate finance,2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc. Damodaran, A. (2015).Applied corporate finance: A user’s manual3rd ed. New York: Wiley, John & Sons. Northington, S. (2015)Finance, 4thed. New York: Ferguson Parrino, R. and Kidwell, D. (2014)Fundamentals of Corporate Finance,3rd ed. London: Wiley Publications Petty, J.W., Titman, S., Keown, A., Martin, J.D., Martin, P., Burrow, M. and Nguyen, H. (2015). Financial Management, Principles and Applications, 6thed.. NSW: Pearson Education, French Forest Australia. .