Brexit Issues United Kingdom 2022

Running Head: BREXIT ISSUE
BREXIT ISSUE
Name of the Student:
Name of University:
Author Note:

1BREXIT ISSUE
Answer 1
The Brexit vote was the stage rehearsal for a regional sentiment that was suppressed over
the national edifice. In other words, it can be stated that the Brexit vote creates a huge
opportunity for the regional powers all across the globe to raise voice against their independence.
From the research of Bruner and Hare (2017) it can be stated that the purpose of Brexit was
different from its far reaching global impacts. Nevertheless, it becomes coincide with the Brexit
vote as a symbol of independence. The impact of Brexit can be defined in many aspects. For
instance, there is a sense of economic nationalism. Political independence is also considered to
be a major feature for the regional interest groups all over Europe (Wilson, 2019). It results a
cultural and ethnicity centric nationalism where the force of nationalism turns unwisely and
becomes more ethic centred. On the other hand, a sense of populism is also developed under the
influence of Brexit vote where the common people come to the forefront and lead the
movements.
From the economic point of view, it can be stated that Britain wanted to get more
economic freedom in order to do business with different European countries. In this regard, it is
important to note that avoiding European Monetary Union (EMU) is also considered to be a
great step for Britain to not involve full-fledged into the European politics (Petersen, 2018).
However, there is always an interest of Britain to take part in the European business and control
the European market with monopoly. As a result of that it is obvious that the Brexit left a great
deal of impact over the economic orientation of Britain. In addition to this, the same situation can
be seen in case of Denmark as well where protests and votes are conducted in order to avoid
dominance and interference of European Union.

2BREXIT ISSUE
It leads to a political turn where the sovereignty and the security of different countries has
become under the threat of immigration pressure. From the research of Bruner and Hare (2017) it
can be argued that the countries that are involved in EU are heavily countered with immigration
problem. As a result of that in Britain, France, Germany and Denmark there were spontaneous
movements were people voted for the protection of their national sentiment. However, in case of
Catalonia and Scotland, people are more aware of the regional rights and sentiments and went to
bring justice for their own sake (Petersen, 2018). On the other hand, ethno-national sentiment is
also escalated in a rapid pace. In Germany people are cry for putting a ban on Islam and wearing
burqas. As a result of that it can be stated that the impact of Brexit is far reaching and it shapes
the world order in a new manner.
Answer 2
There are significant impact of Brexit over Canada’s relationship to EU and UK. Most of
this relationships are associated with the trade relation with both UK and European Union. As
per a member in the European Union, Britain practices a Comprehensive Economic and Trade
Agreement (CETA) with Canada (Hurrelmann et al., 2018). Therefore, the bilateral agreement
between Canada and UK will also get affected as the bilateral agreement was a part of the
agreement made by EU and all the privileges that both Canada and UK got in the process of the
CETA treaty was ended including the MFN tariffs on goods. It is important to note that the trade
relation between Canada and Britain has to be reviewed so that it can foster a great deal of
benefit both the partnering countries.
Amidst the turmoil situation over the decision of leaving European Union, Britain started
thinking about the new trade agreement with Canada. Hence, a new proposal has been made

3BREXIT ISSUE
where British government would eliminate import tariff of nearly 95% with Canada. The MFN
basis is associated with WTO members and the technical certification that would apply with the
no-deal scenario (Belke & Gros, 2017). It is important to note that the Canadian business should
refer to the notifications issued by UK concerning technical certifications that would apply in no-
deal scenario. The bilateral trade relationship can be strengthened with negotiation from both
ends between UK and Canada. As a matter of the UK trade arrangements with Canada intends to
re-engage the bilateral trade discussion influenced by the terms of withdrawal of agreement
between UK and EU (Dennis, 2016). Therefore, it is also essential for Canada to prepare for the
completion of Brexit in order to reinvigorate its migration, customers, freight and logistics
provide. The role of UK in this regard is to assist Canada about proper preparation for the
transition period. As a matter of fact, little change is also fostered in the form of understanding
the revised trade agreement between Canada and European Union as well.
It creates enough understanding regarding the trading facilities between Canada and EU
where re-negotiation will be conducted. It is important to note that business and trade in the
European countries is also considered to be an important aspect for Canada and the Canadian
companies do not intend to put crisis in their continue revenue generation. Therefore, it becomes
a serious issue for the Canadian business enterprises to foster a good relation with the European
market (Hilson, 2018). The magnanimity of the market and lucrative measures put immense
interests on the Canadian companies. As a result of that Canada is highly focusing on its business
tie ups with the European countries without having any clash of interests with United Kingdom.

4BREXIT ISSUE
Answer 3
The role of the UK leadership is dubious and full of inefficacy that resulted to halt the
process OF Brexit and creates a situation of uncertainty. It can be stated that the role of leaders is
to guide the people towards the right direction. However, it seems a dilemma from the end of the
leadership in order to develop an effective decision making for Brexit. The purpose of Brexit is
to create an autonomy for Britain for making its own decision regarding the immigration
problem, security of the country, foreign policy acts and most importantly preparing direct trade
agreement with the European countries. In this regard, the role of leaders is to take adequate
measures before deciding to leave European Union. From the research of Heide and Worthy
(2019) it can be stated that the British leadership failed to influence the people and drove away
with the popular response towards making decision about the relationship with European Union.
In this regard, Grube (2017) articulated that the confidence of the British leadership was
coincided with vote bank politics where both the Conservative and Labour Party decide to ensure
their popular support without having acknowledged the far reaching impact of Brexit. It can be
seen in case of creating policies and planning to set better trade and business without the support
of European Union (Hozić and True, 2017). As a matter of fact, trade benefits had been
considered to be the major focal point for British leaders since the foundation of European
Union. Therefore, the British government also refused to take part in the European Monetary
Fund (EMF). The use of pound over Euro was also a clear example of the partial inclusion of
Britain in European Union. From this point of view, Allen (2018) advocated that direct inclusion
of Britain in European Union was never identified as a policy of the government so that the event
of Brexit was also unwanted. The role of the British leadership was ineffective to manage the
situation and it became worsened.

5BREXIT ISSUE
Reference
Allen, N. (2018). ‘Brexit means Brexit’: Theresa May and post-referendum British
politics. British Politics, 13(1), 105-120.
Belke, A., & Gros, D. (2017). The economic impact of Brexit: Evidence from modelling free
trade agreements. Atlantic Economic Journal, 45(3), 317-331.
Bruner, R. F., & Hare, K. (2017). The panic of 2008 and Brexit: Regional integration versus
nationalism. Ivey Business Publishing, pp. 55-74
Dennis, M. J. (2016). Consider implications of Brexit for international student
mobility. Enrollment Management Report, 20(6), 3-3.
Grube, D. C. (2017). Transforming a Transactional Debate: Leadership and the rhetorical road to
Brexit. Social Alternatives, 36(3), 12.
Heide, M., & Worthy, B. (2019). Secrecy and Leadership: The Case of Theresa May’s Brexit
Negotiations. Public Integrity, 1-13.
Hilson, C. (2018). The impact of Brexit on the environment: exploring the dynamics of a
complex relationship. Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 89-113.
Hozić, A. A., & True, J. (2017). Brexit as a scandal: gender and global trumpism. Review of
international political economy, 24(2), 270-287.
Hurrelmann, A., Atikcan, E. Ö., Chalmers, A. W., & Viju, C. (2018). Political Contestation
about International Economic Agreements: Lessons for the Canada-UK Trade Relationship after
Brexit.

6BREXIT ISSUE
Petersen, J. (2018). Return to hard frontiers?: The shifting significance of borders in the 21st
century, exemplified by the Irish border post-Brexit.
Wilson, T. J. (2019). Not quite anyone's guess: Brexit, forensic science and legal
medicine. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 61, 73-74.