logo

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission | Assignment

   

Added on  2020-04-01

10 Pages2061 Words47 Views
ABS 624701
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission | Assignment_1
Table of ContentsAnswer 1..........................................................................................................................................3Answer 2..........................................................................................................................................3Answer 3..........................................................................................................................................4Answer 4..........................................................................................................................................5Answer 5..........................................................................................................................................6Answer 6..........................................................................................................................................7Answer 7..........................................................................................................................................8References........................................................................................................................................8
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission | Assignment_2
Answer 1The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) found that the advertisementsdisplayed by the TPG Internet Pty Ltd. Were;Misleading and deceptive contrary to the ACL due to differences between the majorheadline offer and comparatively less significant terms which matches with the providedoffer[CITATION Cor13 \l 1033 ]. The ACCC also claimed that a number of advertisements were the breach of theregulations of the TPA because of its failure to specify in a highlighted manner and as aparticular amount with a particular price for the bundle of services being provided by thecompany.The primary judge sustained the claims of the ACCC and considered a fiscal penalty of$2 million over the company[CITATION Aus133 \l 1033 ].Answer 2It was claimed by ACCC that the advertisements of TPG contravened two statutory provisions,they are;It was claimed that the commercials were found to be misleading and deceptive becauseof its contravention with Section 52 of the TPA and Section 18 of the ACL because ofexhibition of discrepancy between the important headline offer to the consumers and thecomparatively less important advertisement matching with the offer[ CITATION Kri13 \l1033 ]. It was stated that the publishing of initial advertisements and then the amendedadvertisement in continuance was the contravention of sections 52, 53(e), 53(g) and 53C
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission | Assignment_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Misleading and Deceptive Advertising by TPG Internet Pty Ltd
|6
|1585
|391

The Australian Business Law
|9
|1734
|28

TPG Internet Pty Ltd Advertising Case Analysis
|5
|1361
|404

ACCC v TPG Case Analysis: Misleading Ads and Legal Rulings
|7
|1556
|353

ACCC v TPG Case Study Analysis - Assignment
|3
|485
|269

Assignment on Introduction To Business Law
|4
|424
|142