(PDF) The basis of right to Self determination

Added on - 15 Mar 2021

  • 6


  • 3740


  • 11


  • 0


Trusted by +2 million users,
assist thousands of students everyday
Showing pages 1 to 3 of 6 pages
Abstract:The issue of euthanasia is now an ethical question for doctors whose patients are terminally ill or in apermanent vegetative state. On one hand, we have the "right to self-determination", on the other hand,there is the code of medical ethics. The advocates of euthanasia believe that everybody has the right tochoose the quality of life and the end to it. However, the critics argue that the request of euthanasiamade by a terminally ill patient is not done in sound or rational mind. The "sacredness of life" conceptintensely provided by different religions opposes the right of self-killing.There is uncertainty of opinion on this matter, which has been debated since long. Our presentdiscussion will deal with the meaning of euthanasia and its sanctity all over the world. The articlehighlights some advantages and disadvantages of euthanasia practice.Key words:Euthanasia, ethics and legal issues.Introduction:The topic of euthanasia is controversial and ambiguous amongst the common public, legal and medicalprofessionals. The term euthanasia originated from the Greek entries for "eu" and "thanatos" Taken inits common usage however, euthanasia refers to the termination of a person's life, usually with terminalor incurable illness. [1] Euthanasia means easy death, mercy killing or voluntary death. In other words,"euthanasia is the termination of the life of the terminally ill patients at their request or in their interest"[2] This question of ending the life of a sufferer who, at his request and in the interests of him, hasraised moral and ethical questions, such as: has that person the right to demand the end of his life(autonomy)? Should the doctor continue his infusion for the purpose of relieving his severe pain(beneficence)? Whether the act is justifiable. Is it ethical for a medical health-care provider who holds aHippocratic Oath (not to harm his patients), to end the life of such a terminally ill patient?.The act of another party always entails euthanasia. If more than one thing The individual participated ina sequence of actions leading to death, which is then called suicide, if the last person acting in thesequence is the person who dies. If someone else is the last actor, even if the person who dies agreesthat death is called a murder, even if the one who dies agrees. Euthanasia always has a particularmotive. Intent is the specific objective and the desired results of an act; the reasons we have are"motifs” Those intentions. Those intentions. The motive is always necessary for euthanasia Becomemercy, and that motive must be altruism, and its core value. This is what we are talking about. Theconcept is so embedded in society that euthanasia is often described as the killing of mercy. HaroldShipman, a British doctor and serial assassin, is killed and not euthanistic when injecting lethal patientsinto the elderly The doses of stupidity so that money left him in their will could be inherited. Even if hisactions actually alleviated some suffering, his motive invalidates a euthanasia claim. When is a murdereuthanasia considered? The concept of "euthanasia" means a "good" death and the act shouldtherefore fulfil commonly agreed criteria for Such criteria may be that they are rapid, relatively painless,and cause Mindful if any, e.g., fear or anxiety, or deep repentance. Death should not deliberately inspire
horror or repulsion, or accompany signs of the dying person's suffering. The reason is not to bepunished. Capitulating, for example, could be fast and even relatively painless, but it would generally notbe seen as an act of euthanasia because it was usually meant to inspire terror in victims and witnessesand to punish the recipient.Different kinds of EuthanasiaPassive euthanasia - The act of deliberation is intended to end the suffering of an incurably terminallysick woman, typically by careful administering of lethal medicines. It's a committee act. [1]“Passive” Euthanasia: A Problematic TermPurpose and prospect are crucial facets of when an act constitutes euthanasia, constitutes some form ofmurder or is indeed a killing act at all in moral and legal terms. The main purpose of inducing death iseuthanasia and suicide. Foresight includes the design of future results that we may or may not hope for.Any actions can fairly be supposed to destroy, but may be performed mostly for motives other thansuicide. One example is the discontinuation of medical procedures on an independent patient's behalf.Patients in the USA have a fundamental right to decide when they will be doing and we not only valuetheir autonomy but also comply with the rules as we withhold those therapies. Because we aim atrespecting freedom and not murdering, physician removal in these conditions is neither suicide, noreuthanasia and even killing, but, considering its foreseen consequences, death isn't the primarypurpose. Some scholarscharacterizethe denial of life-sustaining services when death is practically aguaranteed consequence, but not the primary purpose with the word "passive euthanasia." Nine and ahalf years after the legitimate right of her parents to quit her ventilator treatment, Karen Ann Quinlansurvived. Her parents commented that their purpose never was to destroy Karen but to let her live herlife, however brief it might be, without the unworthiness of unnecessary counselling. The law itselfacknowledges the critical distance between motive and foresight: premeditated (intentional)assassinations are treated differently from.This includes intentional removal or withdrawal of life-long medication which leads to the death of thepatient. [3] An act of omitting, for example, inability to save terminally sick people and/or life cycles orlife spans, disconnection of feeding tubes, etc., implies providing for a continuing internal organicdegradation mechanism without the assistance or replacement of essential functions. "Letting Die"means giving way to a constant inner organic process. The exhumation or expulsion from a fan of anincurably diseased patient is thus not killing in its real sense. Nevertheless, it reflects a bodily act leadingto death. Exhumation does not allow death to occur; it merely changes the time of death. [4]The word passive euthanasia was not unexpectedly defined as a mistake. This procedure is notrecognized as euthanasia in Australia like other countries across the world. Bartels and Otlowski [1]state that withholding or elimination of life-long medication "has become an established part ofmedical practice and is relatively non-controversial" In reality "passive euthanasia’s" is identified as"misleading" by the House of Lords Committee on Medicinal Ethics.[5]Voluntary euthanasiais described as theeuthanasia conducted on thepatient request.Involuntary euthanasiameans that the patient does not want to relieve their pain, and is in fact the productof murder, as euthanasia is done. [6] This is against the patient's wishes.
Non-voluntary euthanasiarequires cases in which the patient cannot give his permission. Such symptoms mayexist whether the patient is in a comatose or has undergone serious psychiatric illness with serious brain trauma,etc.Assisted Suicide or Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS)Suicide is aided by offering knowledge, advice and means to take a life of the person deliberately. The physicianaided by suicidal methods, for example by supplying knowledge and medications, when a physician purposelyencourages people, on their appeal, to end his life. [6]Philosophy and religious contextNeither religious supports euthanasia nor proposes it. Islamic authority does not accept the freedom of the individualto willingly die, relying on a compelling reading of the holy Koran. There are two key explanations for Islamicclaims regarding euthanasiaExistence is holy and the grounds for killing in Islam are not euthanasia/suicide. Allah defines the amount of timethat we exist and supports the purpose in two verses. [7] [5].PresentlegalpositionofEuthanasiainDifferentCountriesEuthanasia in Netherlands:Active voluntary and physician assisted suicide are permitted under certainconditions pursuanttotheTerminationofLifeonRequestandAssisted Suicide (Review Procedures) Act 2002.[3]The Act creates an exemption from criminal prosecution for physicians who "have compiled with requirements ofdue care mentioned in the Act" as well as reporting the case.[10]Euthanasia may be performedonadultsandinchildrenolderthantwelveyearsofage.[1,3]Euthanasia in Belgium:Active voluntary euthanasia is legal under the Act Concerning Euthanasia which cameinto effect in 2002. Euthanasia can only be granted to those whose sufferinginvolves"aseriousandincurabledisordercausedby illness or accident". It imposes an age restriction of eighteen years of age. This act does notmake mention of assisted suicideorphysicianassistedsuicide.[1,3]Euthanasia in Switzerland:Euthanasia is illegal, but assisted suicide is not crime when the motives of theperson assisting are for altruistic reasons and not out of self interest. However, there is no law thatregulates this practice.Euthanasia in Luxembourg:Euthanasia is legal under thePalliative Care/Euthanasia Act 2009, whereit is regulated byalivingwilloradvanceddirective.Doctorsneedtoconsult with a colleague to assesswhether patients are terminally ill and are suffering from a "grave & incurable condition", and haverepeatedlyrequestedtodie.[3]Euthanasia in Australia:In Australia, active voluntary euthanasia, assisted suicide and physician assistedsuicide (PAS) are illegal. The prohibition of euthanasia and assisted suicide is established in the criminallegislation of each Australian state, as well as the common law in the states of New South Wales, SouthAustralia and Victoria. There was a period when the Northern Territory permitted euthanasia andPASunderthe"RightsofTerminallyIllAct(1995)".Theact came into effect in 1996 and made Northernterritory the first place in the world to legally permit active voluntary euthanasiaandPAS.ThisActwasshortlivedaftertheFederal Government overturned it in 1997 with the"Euthanasia LawsAct1997".ThisActdeniedstatesthepowertolegislate topermiteuthanasiaorassistedsuicide.[11]Euthanasia in UK:Currently in UK, any person found to be assisting suicide is breaking the law and canbe convicted of assistingsuicideorattemptingtodoso.Althoughtwothirdsof Britonsthinkitshouldbe
You’re reading a preview
Preview Documents

To View Complete Document

Become a Desklib Library Member.
Subscribe to our plans

Download This Document