Abstract Three centuries ago psychology was a subject which was majorly dependent on the literature, especially the fictional tales. It was a compulsion with them to learn from the anecdotes and characters as they were described in the stories. It was happening because psychology as a subject was not able to accommodate mathematics and science in its mainstream. During the last 50 years, experts of psychology developed a knowledge pool based on the empirical studies, now they are able to answer complex system. Can we repeat the same history with the cultural anthropology, under its current stream, most of the historians are treating it as a side stream in order to punctuate or corroborate certain historical facts? After the arrival of advanced tools of measuring certain areas, cultural anthropology also has this capacity to explore the history and come up with new findings challenge history (Viswesvaran, 2010).
Topic: A research from the lens view of cultural anthropology: Role of the Soft powers in strengthening the empire of colonial powers was more lasting in comparison with their “military might”. Introduction Culture is a variable phenomenon of the society; it keeps on changing, as per the evolution of the society or the presence of a sovereign. History is full of such examples where a winning army changed the culture of a far off land by threatening them with the might and dire consequences. Many big monarchies of the world survived for longer periods because they changed the mass culture of the land and assimilated their rivals into a cultural umbrella. The history of the USA and Canada is full of such examples; European forces construct colonies to produce slaves (Gilkeson, 2010). Apart from the historical wars and flourishing businesses in the colonies, these colonizers also changed the culture of the place as well. This practice gives us an idea about the relationship between the longevity of an empire and the cultural impact. In order to explore the statement even further we can also present a hypothesis for the same. Hypothesis “The study of the cultural anthropology with an intention to measure the impact of the colonizers on the native land can help us in finding a relationship between the strength of the regime and its penetration in the cultural fabric of the native land. Thesis statement The thesis statement of this research is taking us to the next level of the hypothesis and connects it with present-day terminology of the culture and social changes. This thesis statement goes as
under. The rule of the colonial powers finds a better establishment in the native colonies of the USA and Canada because of the prevalence of soft powers rather than the military might and superior weaponry (Descola, 2013). The topic of the research The history of the colonies of the USA and Canada gives us ample examples where the natives started living under a composite culture. This new culture was imposed upon them by the colonial powers. Broadly there were three intentions behind this new composite culture. First it was supporting the prospects of commercial gains of the colonizing powers, second, it was adding discipline in the society and third it was adding some positive changes in the native societies which can be termed as reforms. This composite culture gives us the topic of this research that says, the soft powers inflicted by the colonial rulers brought in some reforms in the native societies and a better lifestyle gave them a better quality of living. This better quality of living was a major reason behind the strength of a colonial empire. Methods In order to cover this topic, we will launch a systemic literature review while picking up some unconventional terms for the search. During the course of this research we will examine the reigns, revolts and quality of the life of the natives and try to draw a conclusion that whether soft powers has a bearing on the nature of the regime or it was simply the power of the might or the fear of losing one’s life that was ruling (Bennett, 2014).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
The nature of the research will be incremental where we will try to compare different practices under a predetermined set of variables. For instance, “quality of the life” of the native people can be one barometer, the distribution of the wealth and profits can be another barometer. Similarly many more metrics can be drawn. Conclusion History can be seen beyond the hard facts and extreme anecdotes, history only highlights the highest point of a civilization, however, it is not the highest point but it is the median where common people are living, forms the correct picture of a society. It happened with the psychology three hundred years ago when dramatists and experts of the literature supplied facts and theories. In the current century once again, filmmakers and documentary makers are doing the same thing by interpreting different eras under the light of present day worldly wisdom. Cultural anthropology in the 21stcentury has this potential to add some exact values into their interpretation and establish a few picture postcards from the past that can be considered as closest to reality.
Bibliography Bennett,T.(2014)‘Liberal government and the practical history of anthropology’,History and Anthropology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp.150–170. Descola,P.(2013)Beyond Nature and Culture,Chicago and London,University of Chicago Press. Gilkeson,J.(2010)Anthropologists and the Discovery of America,Cambridge,Cambridge University Press. Visweswaran,K.(2010)Un/commonCultures:RacismandtheRearticulationofCultural Difference,Durham, NC, and London,Duke University Press.