Accounting. 1. Accounting. Student Number. Class & Cour
Verified
Added on 2022/10/19
|17
|4072
|2
AI Summary
My australian company is Pro Medicus Ltd (PME) and my South African Company is Mediclinic International PLC
I need this assignment in one week so that i can show my tutor as my draft, and can change if needed.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Accounting1 Accounting Student Number Class & Course Code Trimester Number Professor University The City & State Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Accounting2 Executive Summary The conceptual framework provides the company with the basis of developing accounting standards. Before the adoption of the conceptual framework, there was no sufficient definition of key financial elements in the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statements. Each of the statements has its financial elements which are clearly defined and recognised in the conceptual framework. The framework also outlines the qualitative characteristics of financial reports. The reports should be relevant as well as the show as portrays the report as a faithful representation of the company. According to 2018 annual report published by the Pro Medicus Ltd, the company adhered to the requirement of the conceptual framework, and the Australian corporation Act 2001. Companies are slowly turning their attention to CSR initiatives as a means of creating value. The IIRC and the GRI have pushed for the adoption of integrated financial reporting and sustainable financial reporting, respectively. Pro Medicus Ltd is yet to adopt either sustainable reporting or integrate reporting within the current accounting practice globally. On the other hand, Mediclinic International PLC engages with its stakeholders to organizational value. Considering that CSR has become an essential part of business operations, it’s time to adopt either sustainable reporting or integrated reporting.
Accounting3 Introduction The conceptual framework provides the company with the basis of developing accounting standards. A conceptual framework for financial reporting helps the companies to recognise and measure their assets, liabilities, equity, incomes, and expenses. The essence of using the conceptual framework is to ensure that financial reports are relevant and portrays a faithful representation of a company’s financial position. Likewise, organisations such as The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) of integrated financial reporting and sustainable financial reporting, respectively. Companies are slowly turning their attention to CSR initiatives as a means of creating value. This paper examines the application of the conceptual framework, sustainable reporting, and integrated reporting in current accounting practices. The paper is divided into two parts — part A analysis of the application of the conceptual framework for financial reporting. Likewise, part B evaluates the need to adopt either sustainable reporting or integrated reporting. PART A: Conceptual framework a)History and development of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) released its first conceptual framework in 1989. However, this version was criticised for lacking clarity and objectivity. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) was tasked with the responsibility of providing an improved version of the conceptual framework for financial reporting. The process of collecting recommendations and views to develop conceptual framework began in the 1940s in the UK. The process of reviewing the collected information began in 1991, which show the release of the conceptual framework in 2010. In Australia, AASB developed the SACs
Accounting4 1 to 4 which are used to prepare financial reports in the 1990s. AASB adopted the IASB’s conceptual framework in 2005. However, SAC 1 (reporting entity) and SAC 2 (objectives) were retained. In 2004, both IASB and FASB agreed to work together and revise the 1989 conceptual frame. As a result, the 2010 revived conceptual framework was adopted(Delloite, 2018). The 2010 version was more improved compared to the 1989 version. IASB embarked on the process of improving its framework once more. The latest version of the conceptual framework was approved and released on 29 March 2018. The updated version introduced comprehensive changes that had been excluded by the two previous versions(IASB, 2018).Today. Over 200 nations have adopted the IASB’s conceptual framework globally. b)Concerns raised by the Australian accounting professions regarding the Conceptual Framework The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) supports the IASB’s conceptual framework for financial reporting. However, both the AASB and the Australian accounting professions are concerned with the objectivity of the 2018 conceptual framework. AASB believes that the concept cannot be relied on by standard creators at its current state. First, the board believes that the IASB’s conceptual framework need several revisions to conform to the Australian accounting standards and principles. Likewise, the Australian Accounting professions believe that the conceptual framework is incomplete, unclear, and does not address all the current accounting issues facing Australian firms(Delloite, 2018). There is a general view of the conceptual framework for financial reporting has failed to adequately address the current accounting/ financial reporting issues in the Australian and global
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Accounting5 markets. For instance, there is no clear definition between the other comprehensive income (OCI) and the profit and loss statements. Such a confusion might hinder recording to income and expenses in either of the two statements. AASB proposes that IASB should provide a clear distinction to help users to easily differentiate the financial items that appear in either of them. Accounting professions are also concerned about the application of the bundle of rights. The conceptual framework state that assets can be split for accounting purpose. However, professions are concerned with the extent of splitting assets and the impact of such action on the recognition and derecognition of assets. Lastly, New control based approach states that assets should be derecognised when a company loses control of it. However, professions are concerned with what to do when a company has retained partial right on an asset(IASB, 2018). c)Concerns raised by the concerns of the academic about the quality of the Conceptual Framework Numerous academic researches and literature reviews support the 2018 version of the conceptual framework for financial reporting. However, a few criticisms have been reported by academicians. A review that the raised issues are substantial and should be addressed by the IASB(Ravitch, 2016, p. 112).First, academicians claim that the process of developing the conceptual framework in affected by political interference. Different players would present views that support their application without carrying about other stakeholders. Contributors are more interested in self-interest over social interest(PKF International Ltd, 2016, p. 733). Second, the conceptual framework for financial reporting has failed to address weight accounting issues. When heated arguments between members arise on the application of the framework, the objectivity tends to be lost. Third, the conceptual framework has failed to address the non-
Accounting6 performance aspect of business entities(Macve, 2015, p. 79).Fourth, the process of complying with the conceptual framework is costly for small businesses. Fifth, the framework is considered ambiguous because it is open to interpretation. Lastly, principles under the conceptual framework are vague; they describe accounting practices without providing remedies to current accounting issues(Hussey & Ong, 2017, p. 201). d)How Pro Medicus Ltd (ASX: PME) apply a conceptual framework to prepare its annual reports AASB states that the conceptual framework for financial reporting should guide the public listed companies in Australia. This section reviews the application of the framework by the Pro Medicus Ltd to prepare its 2018 financial statements. (i)Financial components used by Pro Medicus to prepare its financial statement The conceptual framework for financial reporting states that an annual report must contain several financial statements to be considered relevant and a faithful representation of an organisation. The recognised financial statements under the conceptual frame and the AASB’s SAC 3 are; a)The balance sheet which comprises of financial elements such as asset, liabilities, and capital, b)The income statement which comprises of income and expense financial elements, c)The cash flow statement is made up of operating, investment, and capital activities of a business. d)Other comprehensive income (OCI) statement, which comprises of the changes in the income and expense financial elements(Pro Medicus Ltd, 2019, p. 45).
Accounting7 The table below shows the financial statements elements and their respective amount from the Pro Medicus Ltd 2018 financial statements as described in the IASB’s conceptual framework and AASB’s SAC 3. Financial StatementsElementsAmount ($m) Balance SheetAssets56,307,000 Liabilities10,644,000 Equity45,663,000 Income StatementIncome36,017,000 Expenses23,273,000 Net cash flows from operating activities 13,873,000 Net cash flows from investment activities (6,327,000) Net cash flows from financing activities (5,125,000) Cash and Cash equivalent25,238,000 Statement of changes in Equity 45,663,000 (ii)Recognition and measurement principles used for revenue, assets, and liabilities Recognition and derecognition of financial elements are addressed in chapter five, while chapter six addresses the measurement of financial elements of the conceptual framework. The AASB SAC 4 also addresses the recognition of financial elements. Recognition refers to including financial elements in the financial statements. Recognising of financial elements is determined by whether or not they meet the definition of assets, liabilities, incomes, or expenses. Financial elements recognised in the financial statements should provide useful information that is portrayed relevancy and faithful representation of an entity(Pro Medicus Ltd, 2019). On the other hand, measurement refers to the value of the elements that should be posted in the financial statements. Monetary values attached to the financial elements should be quantifiable.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Accounting8 The conceptual framework offers several basis for measuring financial elements. The recognised measurement basis is historical cost, and current cost (fair value, present value, and net realisable value)(Pro Medicus Ltd, 2019). Pro Medicus Ltd used the following measurement basis in its 2018 financial statements. The company recognises its income at fair value. Expenses are recognised at their historical cost. Cash and cash equivalent is recognised at fair value, which is their carrying amount. Account receivable are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently at their amortised cost. Plant and equipment are recognised at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment value. Inventory is recognised at the lower value between realisable value and historical cost. Intangible assets are recognised at their fair value. Account payable is recognised at the amortised cost. Provisions are recognised at the present obligations (iii)Qualitative characteristics of information exhibit in the report Chapter two of the financial statement states that financial statements should have qualitative characteristics such as faithful representation, relevance, and materiality. The characteristics are further enhanced by attributes like comparability, understandability, timeliness, and verifiability. Pro Medicus Ltd’s 2018 annual report was prepared by the Australian Corporation Act 2001. The management also complied with the requirements of AASB and IASB. The accounting judgments, assumptions, and estimates made by the management were based on historical
Accounting9 experience, market information, expert opinions, and other valuable factors. The Ernst & young auditors were contracted to contract the 2018 financial report. The auditors believed that the financial report was presented a true and fair value of the company and was complied with the necessary accounting requirements. Therefore, the statements are relevant and present a faithful representation of Pro Medicus Ltd financial position as of June 30, 2018(Pro Medicus Ltd, 2019, p. 18). PART B: Integrated/sustainability reporting a)Comparing Sustainability Reporting Guidelines and International Integrated Reporting Framework The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) have a common goal which seeks the inclusion of non-financial performance indicators in the annual reports. The two organizations believe that the paradigm should shift from conventional financial reporting to a sustainable or integrated financial reporting. GRI and IIRC maintain that firms use a significant amount of resources and time to promote environmental and social wellbeing. The resources and time are invested in creating value by contributing positively to the wellbeing of the stakeholders. However, failure to include such a noble investment in the annual reporting does not profit faithful representation and relevance characteristics of the conceptual framework(IIRC, 2019). The GRI is promoting the adoption of a sustainable reporting over the financial performance based reporting. Sustainable reporting comprises of both the financial and non-financial aspects such as environmental and social. According to the GRI, sustainable financial reporting would enhance efficient and effecting reporting of annual performances. Moreover, it would help in
Accounting10 producing reliable and relevant information that will help stakeholders to make informed decisions. On the other hand, IIRC is pushing for the adoption of an integrated financial reporting, which has a broader view as compared to the GRI’s sustainable reporting. The integrated reporting promotes the inclusion of social and environmental elements of value creation in addition to governance and the relationship between a company and its stakeholders (Deloitte, 2018). b)Examining the conventional accounting about the concepts of sustainability and integrated reporting Conventional accounting can also be referred to as the traditional accounting methods. Under the conventional accounting method focuses more on the financial performance of an organization. In other words, the success of an organisation is measured in its ability to use its financial position to compete. Conventional accounting favoured the investors because it promoted wealth maximisation. Organisations do not have to invest in society and the environment as a way of creating value. Based on this position, conventional accounting cannot help in the successful implementation of CSR initiatives(IIRC, 2019). Today different accounting stakeholders acknowledge the importance of investing in CSR initiatives as a way of creating value by companies. Investing in projects that promote social and environmental wellbeing is on the rise. Likewise, companies are focussed on improving their corporate image and brand reputation. Companies use part of their retained earnings to invest in CSR projects. Stakeholders need to know why and how companies engage in CSR projects. The CSR projects enhance the relationship between the company and stakeholders, which subsequently increase sales volume and profitability. Companies need to embrace either
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Accounting11 sustainable or integrated reporting, which includes both the financial and non-financial performance in the annual reports(Deloitte, 2018). c)Theoretical explanation of the sustainable and integrated reporting Both the sustainable reporting and integrated reporting seek the inclusion of environmental and social factors in financial reporting. The two reporting methods have gained momentum globally because they promote the concept of the social contract. The adoption of the two reporting methods can be explained using legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory, and institutional theory. Legitimacy theory examines the relationship between community expectations and firms disclosure. Firm use media reports to understand how the community perceives them as well as the communities’ expectations from them. In return, the community should use annual reports to address the issues raised by the community and win back its support(Deegan, 2013, p. 72). Stakeholder theory states that the organisation should treat their stakeholders fairly. That is, the decisions made by the management should benefit the organisation’s stakeholders. Organizations have the responsibility to find an optimal balance for conflict of interest between the stakeholders. Moreover, stakeholders have the right to information and accountability from the management. The organization should take social and environmental actions and account for such actions(Deegan, 2013, p. 73). The institutional theory maintains that firms should engage in promoting the social and environmental issues arising from their actions. Some of the stakeholders identified in theory are the society, government, NGOs, and the industry. Organizations not only need to engage in CSR activities but also account for them in the financial reports(Wolk, et al., 2017, p. 69).
Accounting12 d)Components of an integrated report and their application by the Mediclinic International PLC Mediclinic International Plc. Considers stakeholder engagement as the best way to create sustainable business operations. The operations of Mediclinic are patient-centered. Mediclinic holds ethical and professional practices at the highest standards. The hospital also respects the environment and the communities where it operates. Mediclinic believes that voluntary disclosure of its integrated report keeps stakeholders informed about its CSR activities. Mediclinic’s integrated report is summarised as below based on the elements of integrated reporting. Components of Integrated ReportingApplication by Mediclinic International PLC External environment and organizational overview The company is among the 20 highly ranked corporate brands in South Africa. Mediclinic Plc operates eight hospitals in the country. The brand is recognised for providing quality services to the stakeholders. The company has invested significant resources in minimising its environmental impacts and becoming a recognised corporate citizen in the country (Mediclininc PLC, 2019, p. 12). Governance structureThe company established a Clinical Performance and Sustainability committee. The committee is responsible for evaluating the sustainable performance of the company. The main objective of the committee ensures that the company excels as a good corporate citizen. Stakeholder relationshipsMediclinic is accountable to its stakeholders. The company regularly and effectively engage its stakeholders to promote sustainable performance. The key stakeholders for the company are medical practitioners, employees, patients, trade unions, media, government, investors, financiers, industry associates, suppliers, and community(Mediclininc PLC, 2019, p. 25). StrategiesMediclinic’s strategy is based on four pillars a)Investing in employees
Accounting13 b)Improving the quality and safety of care delivery c)Improving patient experience d)Improving efficiency Business modelMediclinic’s business model is based on quality service and promoting the stakeholders’ values. PerformanceThe company has performed exemplary well both in its financial and non-financial sectors. Mediclinic posted and higher profitability level compared to the previous year. The excellence performance was attained from values created for different stakeholders. Internal controls, risks, and opportunities Some of the risks associated with the performance of Mediclinic are ethic failure and fraud, malpractice liabilities, damaged reputation because of poor services, and aging workforce(Mediclininc PLC, 2019). The issues are mitigated by; a)Conducting extensive training of the workforce, b)Adoption of integrated strategies that supports the company’s values, goals, and strategies. c)Implementation of standardised programs to enhance the satisfaction of different stakeholders. d)Components of Pro Medicus Ltd.’s integrated report Most organisations are yet to adopt either sustainability or integrated reporting. The disclosure of non-financial performance is not mandatory. Companies voluntary make the disclosures to create value to their stakeholders. Pro Medicus Ltd focuses on maximizing shareholders wealth. The company has stuck with the conventional accounting method, which focuses on the financial aspect of organizational performance. Besides the annual reports, Pro Medicus Ltd does not public reports about its corporate social responsibility initiatives. The company also lacks sustainable and integrated reports. The company does not engage in CSR services to create value.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Accounting14 Moreover, there is no evidence in the annual report that shows that Pro Medicus Ltd has reported engaging in CSR activities. A comparison between Pro Medicus Ltd and the Mediclinic International PLC shows that they use two different accounting methods. Pro Medicus Ltd uses the conventional accounting method. On the other hand, the Mediclinic International PLC has adopted the sustainability reporting method where the financial and sustainable performance reports during a financial year are released separately. Pro Medicus Ltd focuses its strategy on maximising the shareholders’ wealth without considering the impact of their business activities on the society and environment. Unlike Pro Medicus Ltd., the Mediclinic International PLC publishes a report about its engagement with the different stakeholders to create value. Conclusion The study is divided into two parts which addressed the conceptual framework concept and sustainable and integrated reporting. A conceptual framework is provided to companies with the basis of developing accounting standards. A conceptual framework for financial reporting helps the companies to recognise and measure their assets, liabilities, equity, incomes, and expenses. The conceptual framework is to ensure that financial reports are relevant and portrays a faithful representation of a company’s financial position. Likewise, organisations such as The IIRC and the GRI have been pushing for the adoption of integrated financial reporting and sustainable financial reporting, respectively. Companies are slowly turning their attention to CSR initiatives as a means of creating value. The study found out that Pro Medicus Ltd (ASX: PME) complied with the conceptual framework for financial reporting to prepare its 2018 financial statements. However, the company is yet to
Accounting15 adopt either sustainable reporting or integrate reporting within the current accounting practice globally. On the other hand, the Mediclinic International PLC has incorporated both financial and non-financial indicators of performance in its annual report. Mediclinic International PLC engages with its stakeholders to organizational value. Considering that CSR has become an important part of business operations, it’s time to adopt either sustainable reporting or integrated reporting. References List Deegan, C., 2013.Financial accounting theory.4th Edition ed. North Ryde, N.S.W: McGraw- Hill Education. Delloite, 2018.Conceptual Framework Phase A – Objective and qualitative characteristics,New York: Delloite.
Accounting16 Deloitte, 2018.International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC).[Online] Available at:https://www.iasplus.com/en/resources/sustainability/iirc [Accessed 25 May 2019]. Hussey, R. & Ong, A., 2017.Corporate Financial Reporting.London: Macmillan International Higher Education. IASB, 2018.Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting 2018.[Online] Available at:https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/other/framework [Accessed 25 May 2019]. Idowu, S. O. & Tudor, A. T., 2016. From CSR and Sustainability to integrated Reporting. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation,2(10). IIRC, 2019.Global Reporting Initiative: GRI and the IIRC working together.[Online] Available at:https://integratedreporting.org/profile/global-reporting-initiative/ [Accessed 25 May 2019]. Macve, R., 2015.A Conceptual Framework for Financial Accounting and Reporting: Vision, Tool, or Threat?,New York: Routledge. Mediclininc PLC, 2019.2018 Sustainable Report,Johanesburg: Mediclininc PLC. PKF International Ltd, 2016.Wiley IFRS 2016: Interpretation and Application of International Financial Reporting Standards.Illustrated ed. Mew York: John Wiley & Sons. Pro Medicus Ltd, 2019.2018 Annual Report,Sydney: Pro Medicus Ltd. Ravitch, S. M., 2016.Reason & Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research.London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Accounting17 Wolk, H. I., Dodd , J. L. & Rozycki, J. J., 2017.Accounting Theory: Conceptual Issues in a Political and Economic Environment.1 ed. London: SAGE Publications.