Determinants of Bank Profitability

This assignment delves into the factors that determine profitability within the banking industry. It examines a range of academic sources, including journal articles and books, to analyze key determinants such as macroeconomic conditions, bank-specific variables, capital structure, and risk management practices. The analysis draws on research from diverse geographical contexts, encompassing both developed and emerging economies.

Accounting and Finance

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am thankful to my tutor, friends and relatives who gave me guidance and support in
such project. In completing my dissertation on accounting and finance field they always
encouraged for completing the same prominently. In addition to this, I also appreciate my mentor
for giving me guidance in preparing dissertation. From his support and experience I was in the
position to complete dissertation in a right manner. Finally, I want to extend my sincere thanks to
everyone who have directly or indirectly supported me in completion of my dissertation.

ABSTRACT
The aim behind carry out such dissertation is to investigate factors that have an impact on
the profitability of European banks. In this, for addressing research questions secondary data
sources have been used by the researcher. On the basis of such aspect, by evaluating books,
journals and scholarly articles regarding the factors that impact bank’s profitability secondary
data has been gathered. In addition to this, annual reports of 12 European banks have also been
evaluated to gather data and attain research objectives. Further, statistical tools and techniques
such as descriptive evaluation, correlation and regression have been performed by the researcher
to derive suitable solution. From overall assessment or evaluation, it can be mentioned that loan
ratio is the main elements that contribute in profit margin but to the lower extent. Moreover,
quality of the credit portfolio also has an impact on the profitability of financial institutions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................1
Background of the study..............................................................................................................1
Research aim and objectives........................................................................................................1
Rationale of the study..................................................................................................................1
Significance of the study.............................................................................................................2
Dissertation structure...................................................................................................................2
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW.........................................................................................3
Theme: Factors that impact profitability of banking units..........................................................3
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS.........................................................................................6
Research type...............................................................................................................................6
Research approach and philosophy.............................................................................................6
Data collection.............................................................................................................................7
Sampling......................................................................................................................................7
Data analysis................................................................................................................................7
Reliability and validity................................................................................................................8
Research limitations.....................................................................................................................8
Ethical issues...............................................................................................................................8
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION.............................................................................9

Results..........................................................................................................................................9
Discussion..................................................................................................................................12
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION......................................................................................................15
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................18

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
In the context of sustainable economic development, role and functions performed by
banking sector is highly significant. From assessment, it has been identified that banks play a
vital role in the economic aspects and their stability is also highly required for ensuring effective
financial system. Now, each and every sector including banking is filled up with the high level of
competition. In this regard, for the attainment of high margin banking units need to lay emphasis
on developing sound strategic framework by considering both financial and non-financial
aspects. Further, during the period of global crisis such as 2007-08, position of banking units
become worst. During and after the period of crisis, several banking units faced difficulty in
managing their operations. The present dissertation is based on 12 European banks. In this, study
will shed light on the factors that influenced profitability of such selected banking institutions
within the period of 15 years (from 2000 to 2015). Hence, this study will also present strategies
that can be undertaken by banking units for the maximisation of profit and growth.
Research aim and objectives
Aim: The aim of this dissertation is to determine profitability of European banks over the
period of 2000-2015.
Objectives: Considering above aim, following objectives have been drafted such as:
 To investigate the factors that has an influence on the profitability of banking firms.
 To evaluate profitability of European banks over the period of 2000-2015.
 To recommend the ways that assists banking units in dealing with both micro and macro
factors which influence profitability.
Rationale of the study
The main reason behind conducting present investigation is to ascertain the factors that
have an impact on banking unit’s profitability. This is considered as main issue because after the
period of financial or global crisis, several efforts were made by banking units for making

improvement in monetary aspects. Hence, through the means of quantitative investigation, such
study presents micro / macro and internal as well as external factors that impact profitability
aspect of European banking institutions.
Significance of the study
The present study and its outcome are significant for European banking units which in
turn provides deeper insight to them about the factors that have an impact on profit margin.
Hence, by understanding and evaluating such factors, banking firms would become able to
develop appropriate strategies and policies for the near future. In addition to this, concerned
study and its findings will also assist other scholars who want to conduct study on such topic.
Dissertation structure
Specifically, five chapters have been included by the researcher in dissertation for
analysing and evaluating research issue in a structured way. In the introductory section,
background, aim and objectives have been included by the scholar. Under second chapter, brief
thesis has been prepared the scholar through making assessment of books, journals and scholarly
articles. In the third, chapter researcher identifies and mentions research strategies that are
appropriate for the concerned issue being investigated. Chapter 4 of dissertation presents
findings and supports the same with secondary data set. In chapter 5, researcher concludes
findings and gives suggestions for further improvements.

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature review implies for the evaluation of books, journals and scholarly articles
which in turn provides assistance in developing brief thesis. Hence, literature review may be
served as an attempt to meet research objectives via secondary sources. This chapter of
dissertation is highly effectual which in turn provides assistance in developing brief thesis and
doing analysis of gathered data set.
Theme: Factors that impact profitability of banking units
According to the views of Borio Gambacorta and Hofmann, (2017), profitability aspect
of banking units is highly influenced from both internal and external factors. In this regard,
internal factors consist for management policies, objectives, decisions and actions. Hence, when
business or banking unit fails to make effective and strategic plan then it may be result into lower
profit margin. On the other side, Maudos, (2017) presented in their study that expense is one of
the main factors that impact profitability aspect. Hence, if business or banking unit fails to exert
effectual control on both direct and indirect expenses then it may result into lower margin.
Further, Ozkan Cakan and Kayacan, (2017) assessed in their study that interest rates also have
significant impact on profit margin. Moreover, interest charged by banking institution on loan
considered as income. On the basis of such aspect, when lower interest rate exists then it closely
influences the margin of banking unit.
Sigmund Gunter and Krenn, (2017) claimed that structure which is followed by banking
unit has high level of influence on its profitability. Along with this, findings of such study
presents that profitability aspect is negatively influenced by both credit risk and liquidity.
Moreover, in the case of high liquidity, company is not in position to invest money in other
productive activities. Thus, high liquidity is considered as one of the main cause that impacts
firm’s profitability. Further, such study presents that non-performing loans and amount of credit
also have greater impact on the profitability of banking units. Rowley Shipilov and Greve,
(2017) identified in their study that ROA and ROE are the most effectual measures that helps in
making assessment of profitability aspects. Moreover, ROA presents the return which is
generated by the firm through using assets. Further, ROE presents the extent to which, firm has

made effectual use of shareholders fund during specific accounting period. Hence, through
evaluating the outcome of such financial tool banking units can assess whether they need to
make modifications in the existing strategic framework or not.
Anginer Cerutti and Pería, (2017) investigated that size is another main factors that
impact profitability of banking units. Such study entails that profitability persists to a balanced
size. When size of banking units are large then it gets high economies of scale. For instance:
Increasing or high size allows banking units to spread their fixed cost over a greater assets base.
This in turn may result into reduction in average costs. In addition to this, when scale of
operation enhances then banking unit would become able to use specialized inputs more
effectually. In other words, it can be depicted that in the case of large size, banking can enhance
efficiency by undertaking input provided by loan officers. However, on the critical note, Saif-
Alyousfi Saha and Md-Rus, (2017) stated that size is not only the factor that have an impact on
long term profitability of banking units. In accordance with such evaluation, profitability of
banking sector impacts from both characteristics of bank and market in which it is operating.
Hence, bank specific factors and characteristics include both business strategies as well as
organizational structure. On the other side, market specific factors include both market
competition and local economic conditions (Islam and et.al., 2017). Thus, considering such
aspects, it can be depicted that both bank and market specific factors has greater impact on firm’s
profitability. Further, Isik Kosaroglu and Demirci, (2018) argued that solvency position and
profitability of European banks. Moreover, high debt position imposes fixed monetary burden in
front of firm regarding interest payment. Thus, by taking into account such aspect, it can be
mentioned that financial structure and level of debt as well as equity has impact greater impact
on organization’s profitability.
Further, Demirgüç-Kunt and Singer, (2017) found in their study that deposit ratio helps is
one of the most effectual factors that can be undertaken to examine and evaluate profitability
aspects. Moreover, when banking units collect or get more deposit then they become able to
offer more loan opportunities to the customers and thereby attain higher margin. In other words,
higher deposit level makes significant contribution in business development and leads
profitability. Thus, considering such aspects, it can be said that higher deposit ratio proves to be
more advantageous for banking unit over the lower one. In the study, Borio Gambacorta and

Hofmann, (2017) mentioned that GDP and inflation rate is another main external factor that
affects organisational profitability. Findings of such study presents that positive relationship
takes place between GDP and profit margin. The rationale behind this, poor economic condition
places negative impact on the quality of loan portfolio. Moreover, such kind of situation may
cause of credit loss which in turn impacts bank profitability. In contrast to this, when economic
condition enhances then it may result into improvement in the solvency of borrowers. Along
with this, improved economic condition increases the demand for credit needed by households.
Thus, all such aspects positively contribute in the profit margin of banking institutions. On the
contrary to this, Maudos, (2017) presented in their research inflation also has significant impact
on bank’s profitability. However, level of impact is highly influenced from the extent to which
inflationary tendencies take place. This can be evaluated or measured through analysing the
effect of inflation on salaries and other operating cost of banking units.
However, as per the views of Ozkan Cakan and Kayacan, (2017), one can assess the
impact of inflation on bank’s profitability when it is fully anticipated. The reason behind this,
when banking units have information about inflation rate then it can adjust interest rates. This in
turn increases revenue significantly as compared to cost and thereby enhances overall
profitability. Thus, inflation also has positive impact on the profit margin of banking units.
Sigmund Gunter and Krenn, (2017) argued that inflationary environment impacts profitability of
banking units when they have high capital ratio. Under such situation, cost increase faster in
comparison to revenue.

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS
In this, research tools that have been employed by the scholar for addressing questions
and meeting objectives included. Hence, this chapter of dissertation presents research approach
and philosophy that suits to the research issue. Further, such chapter also exhibits techniques that
can be used for the purpose of data collection and analysis.
Research type
Qualitative and quantitative are the main two research types that can be undertaken by
scholar. Under qualitative research, scholar lays emphasis on evaluating and assessing uncover
trends in thoughts as well as opinion. On the other side, quantitative investigation focuses on the
evaluation of numeric facts and figures (Friese, 2012). Hence, in this, to analyse the profitability
of European banks from the period of 2000 to 2015, quantitative investigation has been selected.
On the basis of such research type, by making assessment of quantitative data set regarding
profitability solution has been presented by the researcher.
Research approach and philosophy
Approaches of the research can be distinguished into two types such as inductive and
deductive. Inductive approach is highly suitable for qualitative investigation that ends with the
generalization of new theoretical framework. On the other side, deductive approach starts with
existing theoretical framework and ends on the confirmation of hypothesis (Punch, 2009).
Further, there are mainly two philosophies that researchers usually employ namely positivism
and interpretivism. Hence, selection of both approaches and philosophies are highly influences
from the type of investigation carried out. In this, considering quantitative research type,
deductive approach and positivism philosophy has been selected by the researcher. Hence, as per
positivism philosophy through analysing numeric figures suitable solution of the issue has
assessed. The main reason behind considering the selection of such approach and philosophy is
that it highly suitable for the quantitative research type. In addition to this, through employing
deductive technique researcher has proved hypothesis framed or developed by taking into
account existing theoretical framework.

Data collection
Specifically, there are mainly two sources that can be used for the purpose of data
collection such as primary and secondary. Primary sources imply for the one that researcher
undertakes for the collection of data set as per objectives such as survey, observation, focus
group etc. On the contrary to this, secondary data sources include books, journals and scholarly
articles that has already been gathered as well as published by the researcher (Mackey and Gass,
2015). In this, for addressing research questions secondary data sources have been used by the
researcher. On the basis of such aspect, by evaluating books, journals and scholarly articles
regarding the factors that impact bank’s profitability secondary data has been gathered. In
addition to this, annual reports of 12 European banks have also been evaluated to gather data
pertaining to profit margin, liquidity, solvency and efficiency. Hence, such data set and findings
presented by other scholars assist in presenting the factors that affect profitability of firms
operating in banking sector.
Sampling
In research, due to the lack of having enough time and financial resources, it is not
possible for the researcher to conduct study on whole population. Thus, there are mainly two
sampling techniques such as probabilistic and non-probabilistic that can be employed for sample
selection (Panneerselvam, 2014). Hence, as per quantitative research type, considering simple
random sampling technique 10 European banks have been selected by the researcher. This in
turn includes Barclays Plc, Standard Chartered plc, Lloyds banking group, Deutsche, Royal bank
of Scotland, Commerzbank AG, Erste, UBS, HSBC and BNP Paribas. Such sampling technique
is the part of probabilistic which in turn helps in assessing optimal outcome by avoiding the level
of biasness.
Data analysis
It refers to the systematic process that is used to analyse and discover suitable
information from data set. Tools and techniques of data analysis vary in accordance with the type
of investigation selected (Gast and Ledford, 2014). Moreover, thematic perception test technique
is highly suitable when qualitative investigation conducted. In contrast to this, SPSS tools offer
optimal solution when outcome is based on numeric figures. In this, solution of concerned
research issue or problem is based on quantitative data set. Referring such aspects, statistical

tools and techniques have been undertaken by the researcher. Hence, by doing correlation
analysis, scholar has presented factors that impact profit margin of banking firms.
Reliability and validity
For ensuring reliability, relevant and latest articles have been used by the researcher that
published after the period of 2007. The rationale behind considering such aspect is that latest
articles provide with updated and specific information regarding the concerned issue. Along with
this, to enhance validity of findings, no alterations have done in the numeric facts and figures.
This in turn ensures that no biasness has been considered to get the desired level of outcome or
success.
Research limitations
Time and lack of availability of enough resources are considered as the main limitation of
study. Hence, for managing time specific time and conducting study within the suitable Gantt
chart has been prepared. This in turn gives clear indication about the time within which research
activity needs to be completed. Further, there are several sites that require money for accessing
the same. In this regard, by doing in-depth research or investigation data has been gathered and
analysed.
Ethical issues
Ethical aspects are the one that enhance significance of the study to a great extent. On the
basis of such aspect, reference list has been added by the researcher. This in turn shows that
findings of other researchers have been rephrased rather than copied. Along with this, no biased
judgments have been considered which in turn reflects that study and its findings are highly
appropriate.

CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Data analysis implies for the process of inspection, cleansing, transforming and modeling
data set. This chapter of dissertation is highly significant which in turn helps in discovering
suitable information and thereby gives input for suggesting conclusion and recommendations. In
this, statistical tools such as descriptive evaluation, regression analysis and correlation have been
used by the scholar for analyzing factors that impact profitability of banking institutions. Hence,
referring the investigation type namely quantitative statistical tools have been undertaken. On
the basis of panel data set, all the variables are observed or assessed for each cross-section and
time period. Further, for presenting the fair view of study findings have supported with the brief
thesis prepared in literature review section.
Results
Descriptive statistics
Particulars ROE
Deposit
ratio size
capital
ratio
loan
ratio
Mean 0.076 0.665 14585110 0.091 0.681
Standard Error 0.009 0.104 3863936 0.014 0.108
Median 0.087 0.460 921289.5 0.047 0.550
Mode 0.000 #N/A 38865 #N/A #N/A
Standard Deviation 0.111 1.31 48875349 0.18 1.36
Sample Variance 0.012 1.72 2.39E+15 0.03 1.85
Kurtosis 6.969 48.81 10.56 25.64 38.13
Skewness -1.594 6.55 3.48 4.83 5.93
Range 0.861 11.82 2.14E+08 1.24 11.16
Minimum -0.516 0.01 38865 0.00 0.01
Maximum 0.345 11.83 2.14E+08 1.25 11.16
Sum 12.149 106.36 2.33E+09 14.52 108.99
Count 160 160 160 160 160
Confidence
Level(95.0%) 0.017 0.20 7631258 0.03 0.21

Interpretation: Outcome of descriptive statistics presents that mean return on equity
generated by 10 banking units during the period of 15 years accounted for 7% significantly.
Further, standard deviation assessed from such data set implied for 1% which in turn presents
that mean value will not deviate significantly. Along with this, mean and median deposit ratio of
banking institutions was .66 and .46. In addition to this, by applying the tool of descriptive
statistics on gathered data set it has found that mean size or total assets of concerned financial
institution was 14585110. Further, median size or total assets of European banking units implied
for 921289.5 significantly. From evaluation, it has identified that average capital and loan ratio
was 0.091 & 0.681 during the period of 2000-2015. In the context of such two variables level of
standard deviation was higher. Along with this, 50% value of data set belongs from 0.047 &
0.550 significantly. Hence, at the time of developing strategic framework European banking
units should keep in mind the outcome of descriptive statistics.
Correlation matrix
ROE
Deposit
ratio size
capital
ratio
loan
ratio
ROE 1 -0.001 -0.107 -0.013 0.103
Deposit
ratio -0.001 1 -0.041 0.798 0.762
size -0.107 -0.041 1 0.072 -0.015
capital
ratio -0.013 0.798 0.072 1 0.780
loan
ratio 0.103 0.762 -0.015 0.780 1
Regression analysis
Hypothesis 1:
Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean value of ROE and size
of the banking units.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and size of the banking units.
Hypothesis 2:

Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean value of ROE and
deposit ratio of the banking units.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and deposit ratio of the banking units.
Hypothesis 3:
Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean value of ROE and
capital ratio of the banking units.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and capital ratio of the banking units.
Hypothesis 4:
Null hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean value of ROE and
loan ratio of the banking units.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and loan ratio of the banking units.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.212
R Square 0.045
Adjusted R
Square 0.020
Standard Error 0.109
Observations 160
ANOVA
df SS MS F
Significance
F
Regression 4 0.0888 0.022 1.832 0.12
Residual 155 1.861 0.012
Total 159 1.949
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value

Intercept 0.077 0.010 7.561 3.29E-12
Deposit
ratio -0.010 0.012 -0.856 0.394
size 0.000 0.000 -1.207 0.229
capital
ratio -0.098 0.093 -1.057 0.292
loan ratio 0.026 0.011 2.335 0.021
On the basis of output assessed above, results are enumerated below:
Hypothesis 1: p = 0.229 (Null hypothesis is true)
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and size of the banking units.
Hypothesis 2: p = 0.394 (Null hypothesis is true)
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and deposit ratio of the banking units.
Hypothesis 3: p = 0.292 (Null hypothesis is true)
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and capital ratio of the banking units.
Hypothesis 4: p = 0.021 (Alternative hypothesis is true)
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the mean value of ROE
and loan ratio of the banking units.
Discussion
The above depicted table shows that negative and lower correlation takes place between
ROE and size, deposit and capital ratio. In other words, it can be mentioned that relationship
takes place between such two factors is negative but at negligible level. Hence, by taking into
account all such aspects it can be said that profitability of firm influences from the size or level
of operations take place. Such findings can clearly be supported with the secondary data
evaluation which in turn shows that when financial institution expands its operations or work at
large level then it enjoys high economies of scale. In this way, business or banking units can
make improvement in margin by enhancing operational size. However, data set evaluated

through the means of statistical tools present that p value is less as compared to standard limit
such as 0.05. By keeping such aspect in mind, it can be said that alternative hypothesis is false.
Hence, no statistical and significant difference takes place in the average values of return on
equity and operational size. Previous studies and their results show that firm or banking units can
amplify profitability by increasing size but not always. Besides this, scholarly articles also show
that banks can reduce or decline cost level by increasing size but on the other side financial
institution also incurs scale of inefficiencies. Due to this, sometimes smaller banking units could
be more profitable in comparison to the large one. Hence, in the case of large sized financial
institution, negative relationship exists between size and profitability aspect. Moreover,
sometimes, size imposes direct cost associated with management, bureaucratic process and
agency aspects.
Further, correlation matrix exhibits that both deposit and capital ratio does not have
significant influence on banking institutions profitability. Along with this, outcome of regression
analysis shows that p>0.05 which in turn entails that null hypothesis is true and other one is
rejected. As per this, no significant difference takes place in the mean values of ROE and deposit
ratio. It presents that value of both dependent and independent variable is moving in the same
direction. This can be linked from scholarly articles which in turn presents that sometimes high
earnings reduce or decrease the level of profitability aspects. The rationale behind this, banking
institutions is less profitable when demand for the loan is little. During the period of recession,
individuals were not having ability to take loan for meeting their requirements. Hence, when
incapacity of bank exists pertaining to release money through loan then it impacts profitability
aspect. Moreover, in the case of deposits, banks are obliged to make interest payment to the
concerned depositors.
In the context of capital ratio or equity to total assets measure, it can be depicted that both
ROE and cap is negatively correlated. In addition to this, p value related to such hypothesis
accounts for .292 respectively. It shows that p value determined through multi-regression
analysis is lower in against to 0.05. By considering this, it can be said that null hypothesis is
accepted. Such finding or outcome is not in line with the results presented by some other
scholars earlier. Moreover, in the study, they demonstrated that best performing banks are the
one who preserves and maintains high equity over assets. However, it has also assessed from the
evaluation that direct relationship between return on equity and capital ratio is not assured. Thus,

some of the studies presented that banking units with lower capital having higher profit margin
as compared to the one who are well capitalized. Thus, from overall evaluation it can be
mentioned that banking institutions in Europe should maintain capital ratio in line with the
current situation and competitor’s trend.
Further, results of regression analysis present that p<0.05 in the case of loan ratio. On the
basis of such aspect, alternative hypothesis framed proved as true and other one is false. Along
with this, correlation matrix also suggests lower but positive relations between the variables such
as return on equity and loan ratio. Findings depicted in literature presents that liquidity aspect is
one of the main indicators that assist in defining or explaining bank’s profitability. Moreover, it
is expected or assumed that banking institution which holds or maintains high quantity of liquid
loans probably obtains higher margin. Hence, bank loans are the main sources whose anticipated
impact on \profit margin is positive. However, from theoretical perspective, it is difficult to make
appropriate prediction about the impact of loan on banking institution’s profitability. Moreover,
high loan volume enables banking units to create or explore business and thereby generates more
profit. However, differences take place in the profitability of financial institutions highly depend
on credit risk changes. All such aspects present that effect of loan ratio on bank’s profitability
cannot be measured and evaluated from theoretical perspective. The reason behind this, profit
margin of banking unit influences from both amount and composition of credit portfolio. Thus, it
can be presented that size of bank’s credit portfolio influences the level of profit margin to a
great extent. From overall assessment or evaluation, it can be mentioned that loan ratio is the
main elements that contribute in profit margin but to the lower extent. Moreover, quality of the
credit portfolio also has an impact on the profitability of financial institutions.

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION
In this, quantitative research has been carried to assess the factors that impact profitability
aspect of European banking units. By using multiple regression analysis and undertaking the
sample of 10 banks which are operating in Europe evaluation has done. For addressing research
objectives data from 2000-2015 have been considered which in turn helps in assessing optimal
solution of the concerned issue. From assessment, it has been concluded that period of global
crisis 2007-08 placed negative impact on the profitability and overall operations of banking
units. During this time period, several banking units were acquired by leading units due to
disability in relation to managing operations. Besides this, it can be inferred that size is one of
the main factors that impacts profitability of banking firms. Moreover, companies get and enjoy
high economies of scale when they perform at large or wide level. Hence, business unit can
improve profit margin by increasing the level or size of operations. However, it can be
summarized from the evaluation that lower level of negative correlationship takes place between
profit margin and size of operations. By taking into account such aspect it can be depicted that
size has positive impact on the profitability aspect or margin of European banking units.
By summing up this report, it has been concluded that measure such as equity to total asset
is one of the main determinants of profitability in the context of European banking units. On the
basis of such aspect, it can be stated that well or highly capitalized banking units can enhance
profitability by reducing the cost or level of external financing. It can be presented from
secondary data evaluation that deposit ratio and organizational profitability is highly related with
each other. In accordance with such aspect, when deposit ratio is higher then capacity of bank in
relation to providing loan to the borrowers. This in turn increases customer’s profit to a great
extent and thereby contributes in success. Further, it can be mentioned from the evaluation that
size of bank’s credit portfolio has significant impact on its profitability aspects either in a
positive or negative manner. Moreover, profitability of European banking units are highly
affected from credit quality.
From assessment, it can be concluded that deposit ratio places positive impact on the
return on equity of European banking units. In addition to this, it has assessed from secondary
data evaluation or assessment that size, capital and loan ratio has positive influence on the

profitability aspect of European banking firms. Such finding can also be supported with
statistical evaluation which in turn exhibits that loan ratio has significant impact on the
profitability of banking units operating in Europe. The main reason behind this, loan aspect
enables banking institution to generate high margin by lending money to others. Moreover, in
against to offering financial support banking institution charges high interest that considered as
an income for them. Thus, it can be entailed from the evaluation that by making improvement in
loan ratio banking institutions operating in Europe can improve profit margin. Thus, from overall
assessment it can be presented that size, level of deposit, loan etc closely influences the level of
profit margin.
Recommendations
 Referring secondary assessment, it is recommended to the managers of European banking
units that they need to lay emphasis on improving the size of operations. This in turn
helps manager of the concerned firms in reducing the level of expenses and thereby
improves profit.
 Further, managers of European banks are suggested to make focus on the development
of sound strategic and policy framework regarding loan ratio. In other words, it can be
mentioned that by making improvement in the quality of loan and such ratio profit can be
maximized by financial institution operating in Europe.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals:
Anginer, D., Cerutti, E. and Pería, M. S. M., 2017. Foreign bank subsidiaries' default risk during
the global crisis: What factors help insulate affiliates from their parents?. Journal of
Financial Intermediation. 29. pp.19-31.
Borio, C., Gambacorta, L. and Hofmann, B., 2017. The influence of monetary policy on bank
profitability. International Finance. 20(1). pp.48-63.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Singer, D., 2017. Financial inclusion and inclusive growth: a review of
recent empirical evidence.
Friese, S., 2012. Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS. SAGE
Gast, D.L. and Ledford, J.R., 2014. Single case research methodology: Applications in special
education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Isik, O. and Tasgin, U.F., 2017. Profitability and Its Determinants in Turkish Manufacturing
Industry: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Model. International Journal of Economics and
Finance. 9(8). p.66.
Isik, O., Kosaroglu, S. M. and Demirci, A., 2018. The Impact of Size and Growth Decisions on
Turkish Banks’ Profitability.
Islam, M. A. and et.al., 2017. Determinants of Profitability of Commercial Banks in Bangladesh.
International Journal of Banking and Financial Law. 1(1). pp.01-011.
Mackey, A. and Gass, S.M., 2015. Second language research: Methodology and design.
Routledge.
Maudos, J., 2017. Income structure, profitability and risk in the European banking sector: The
impact of the crisis. Research in International Business and Finance. 39. pp.85-101.
Ozkan, N., Cakan, S. and Kayacan, M., 2017. Intellectual capital and financial performance: A
study of the Turkish Banking Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review. 17(3). pp.190-198.

Panneerselvam, R., 2014. Research methodology. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd..
Punch, F. K., 2009. Introduction to Research Methods in Education, SAGE.
Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V. and Greve, H. R., 2017. Board reform versus profits: The impact
of ratings on the adoption of governance practices. Strategic Management Journal. 38(4).
pp.815-833.
Saif-Alyousfi, A. Y., Saha, A. and Md-Rus, R., 2017. Profitability of Saudi Commercial Banks:
A Comparative Evaluation between Domestic and Foreign Banks using CAMEL Parameters.
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 7(2). pp.477-484.
Sharma, D. K. and Wadhwa, R., 2017, July. Determinants of Dividend Policy Decision: An
Analysis of Banks in India. In Proceedings of International Conference on Strategies in
Volatile and Uncertain Environment for Emerging Markets (pp. 617-623).
Sigmund, M., Gunter, U. and Krenn, G., 2017. How Do Macroeconomic and Bank‐specific
Variables Influence Profitability in the Austrian Banking Sector? Evidence from a Panel
Vector Autoregression Analysis. Economic Notes. 46(3). pp.555-586.