Accounting Research and its Future

This assignment delves into the current state and future trajectory of accounting research. It examines various schools of thought within accounting theory, including the influence of stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting. The analysis considers the impact of technological advancements and globalization on research methodologies and practical applications. Students are encouraged to critically evaluate existing research paradigms and propose potential avenues for future exploration in accounting.

Running head: ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
Accounting perspective and research
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
1
Table of Contents
Requirement 1:.................................................................................................................................1
Requirement 2:.................................................................................................................................2
Requirement 3:.................................................................................................................................5
Requirement 4:.................................................................................................................................6
Requirement 5..................................................................................................................................8
Title of the research project.............................................................................................................8
Importance of research....................................................................................................................8
Research Question...........................................................................................................................8
Literature Review............................................................................................................................9
Accounting theories.......................................................................................................................11
Methodology..................................................................................................................................14
Interview questions........................................................................................................................15
Ethics approval..............................................................................................................................15
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................16
References list:...............................................................................................................................18

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
2
Requirement 1:
The significant terms that should be discussed for understanding non-accountant in area
of accounting theory are accounting, system-based theories, sustainability reporting, non-
regulatory disclosures, integrated reporting and corporate social responsibility.
Accounting- Accounting can be defined as the system for the communication and
measurement of feedback information on the process and state of organization. Accounting is
regarded as a body of knowledge that is based on concepts of general principles incorporating
framework of general principles. Accounting is a comprehensive and systematic process of
measuring, recording, classifying, identifying, interpretation, summarizing and communication
financial information to their stakeholders (Benson et al. 2015).
System based theories-Nature of accounting can be described using general system
theory and the nature of accounting are described within the framework. Basic framework are
required by accountant for enabling them to describe and determine coherence and order of their
field of knowledge. Such reporting is integrated and holistic representation of performance of
organization in terms of their sustainability and finance (Beattie 2014). This particular theory is
considered as useful in describing the nature of accounting
Sustainability reporting- Sustainability report is the part of report presented by
organization disclosing information about social, economic and environmental impact that is
caused by their activities. It is platformthat is used by organization to communicate measure and
understand social, environmental, and economic and governance performance for effective
management. Stakeholders are provided information about the transparency about opportunities
and risk faced by them.

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
3
Integrated reporting- An integrated reporting is a concept that is introduced to eloquent
range of measures in a better way and contributing to organization’s long-term value. It is a
summarizing communication about how the performance, governance, strategy has helped in
creation of medium, short-term and long-term value.
Non-regulatory disclosures-Non regulatory disclosures are disclosures that is made by
organization in their annual report that are not regulated by accounting standards. It is the
provision of information by the management of organization that is not required by General
accepted accounting principles. Investors’ places reliance such information, however, reliability
of such information is doubtful if they are not regulated by accounting standards.
Corporate social responsibility-It is an approach and concept of management that is
used by organization to integrate their environmental and social concerns in the operations of
business and interacting with stakeholders. Concept of corporate social responsibility is regarded
as the approaches that assist organization in achieving a balance of environmental, social and
economic imperative. Expectations of stakeholders and shareholders are addressed using the
platform or corporate reporting (Gaffikin 2014). Corporate social responsibility is regarded as
one of intrinsic element of integrated reporting.
Requirement 2:
Stakeholders are the person who are directly or indirectly influence the outcome of any
project and is impacted by the project. Stakeholders might include individual in formal and
informal representativeness, communities that are locally affected, shareholders, politicians,
government authorities, politicians, group with special interest, other business and academic
community. A range of activities and interactionis encompassedin the concept of stakeholders’

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
4
engagement. There are several building blocks of stakeholders such as stakeholder involvement
in monitoring project, disclosure of information, consultation of stakeholders, management of
grievance, management functions and reporting to stakeholders (Jiang and Penman 2013). It is
not necessary that all the stakeholders in particular group share the same concerns or have
unified priorities and opinions.
An organization make use of systematic approach for identifying stakeholders that are directly or
indirectly affected by project. Identification and analysis of stakeholders is a challenging
exercise and focusing on stakeholders and communities is not sufficient for stakeholders. It is
also required to consider such stakeholders that are adversely impacted by stakeholders.
Organizations are required to engage in different stakeholder engagement practices and
integrating into the system at the stage of management. Strategies of engagement of organization
are designed by aligning with the needs of their corresponding projects (Henisz et al. 2014).
During challenging times, engagement with stakeholders helps in proactively consulting
relationship that would serve as capital.
Stakeholder engagement is defined as the process that is used by organization to influence their
process of decision-making by engaging relevant stakeholders. Concept of stakeholder
engagement is becoming increasing important that helps in delivering projects successfully. This
particular concept is merging in a broader sense as a continuous and inclusive process between a
organization and those who are potentially impacted by such activities. Such stakeholder
engagement assist organization in building better relationship between with the societies in
which they are operating. The ultimate result of such engagement is to improve the process and
planning of business (Concannon et al. 2014). There are several approach to stakeholder

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
5
engagement that comprise of participation, consultation, partnership, pull communication and
push communication. All the approached of stakeholder engagement is a valid method.
Organization are required to employ stakeholder engagement model and this involves:
 Reviewing, acting and reporting
 Identification of key and relevant stakeholders issues
 Designing the engagement and process
 Strengthening the capacities of management
 Analysing and planning
An organization has many stakeholders and as per the stakeholder’s theory, it is required by
companies to serve those who take stake in firms. As per the stakeholder model, there are various
stakeholders of organization that influences the operations of firms. Some of the stakeholders of
organization are investors or shareholders, suppliers, government, trade associations, employees,
communities, customers and political groups (Barth 2015).
One of the key stakeholders of organization is government and it is essential to maintain and
establish good working relationship with authorities of government at different levels and
keeling them informed about the activities of project. One of the fact that is highly recommended
to organization is keeping a track of government led consultation with stakeholders. Another key
stakeholder is customers; it is not possible for organization to strive in any situation and complex
challenges. Business partners are another important stakeholder along with suppliers and
distributors (Bonin 2013). Successful engagement of stakeholders within organization involves
active involvement in planning, designing and developing solutions for business.

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
6
Requirement 3:
There are various accounting theories that would help in the development of stakeholder
engagement.
Positive accounting theory- Positive accounting theory is based on the assumption that people
intends to adopt the strategies that would help in increasing their wealth as they are
opportunistic. Action of individual such as any stakeholder is motivated by core belied that is
self interest. Actions of individuals are considered to be predictable and this particular theory
helps in proving explanation to the managers. Behaviours of human are also incorporated in this
theory and as a result of this; it will help in creating basis for stakeholders to get engaged in
organizational activities (Avelé 2014). This particular theory is considered relevant to researcher
when they are engaged in answering the questions which they are interested in.
Normative theory of accounting- It is prescribed by normative accounting theory about how
particular activities are undertaken and this might lead to shifting or migration from existing
practice. In this theory, some standards, norms and objectives generates the results that actual
practice intends to achieve. It considers the way of undertaking financial accounting by
organization in the event of changing market conditions and changing prices. Stakeholder theory
is provided with normative justification using this theory. The ethical branch of stakeholder
theory incorporates normative approach. Rights o stakeholders are involved in the responsibility
of organization along with right to information for determination of accountability in relation to
the stakeholders. The process of useful financial information incorporates involves the
enhancement of qualitative and fundamental characteristics (Baker and Burlaud 2015). Faithful
representation is one of such characteristics that are required by organization and it should help

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
7
in facilitating stakeholders engagement. Deductive reasoning forms the basis of such type of
stakeholder engagement research and it helps in the development of basis that informs people of
what should be done. The theories that are proposed by researchers is based on the values, belief
and norms held by them and incorporated deduction process. Accountability of business entities
are developed by various normative perspectives and normative accounting theory is based on
the fact that observation of researcher is based on what they seek or what they want to occur in
any particular circumstances (Craig and Michaela 2014). It makes use of logical arguments for
addressing the facts and conducting any types of research.
Institutional theory- Various reporting decisions in an organization are driven by institutional
theory. This particular theory is used for explanation of motivation of managers for making any
non financial disclosures that it might be related to providing relevant facts and information of
various corporate activities on the environment. This theory assist researcher in the development
of system oriented theories that might facilitate engagement of stakeholders in the decision
process of organization (Dawkins 2014). It comprise of strategy that helps in influencing the
relationship of organization with other parties for interacting such as stakeholders which are
regarded as important.
Requirement 4:
In this requirement, it is asked to determine the relevance and adequacy of data in any study or
while carrying out research. One professor is of the view that secondary data is sufficient for
conducting study and other professor believes that both primary and secondary data is required
for conducting study. Primary data are obtained from the field of enquiry and secondary data are
obtained from already published sources. Primary and secondary data has their own advantages

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
8
and disadvantages. For supporting given idea in any research process, it is required by researcher
to have sources of data. In general academic understanding, secondary data is regarded as
secondary references which support the notion of actual research conducted. Secondary data is
obtained from secondary sources that are already published research has already been conducted.
The sources of primary data are conducting survey, developing questionnaires, interviews,
observations, experiments. All such sources are developed by researcher based on their own
knowledge, beliefs, circumstances and facts. On other hand, sources of secondary data involves
books, magazines, journals, newspaper, general websites, e journal, government records,
unpublished personal records, weblogs and published electronic sources.
When researcher are collecting the data themselves by conducting surveys pr preparing questions
for interviews, it helps them in directly observing the facts and understand the actual scenario of
the topic of research. Behaviour or practices that are relevant to the interest of researcher would
be obtained by collecting primary data. Primary data helps in proving reliable, authentic and
valid data that helps in facilitating the process of research. On the other hand, secondary data are
not directly collected from the field of enquiry and hence they can be less valid as against
primary data. Researcher relies on secondary data when it is difficult for them to source primary
data as it is more easy and possible to collect. Furthermore, secondary data can suffice in the
event when participants in the primary data are not willing to reveal the actual scenario.
Therefore, secondary data are useful when researchers are not able to collect reliable primary
data. It is possible for researcher to conduct research using secondary data, however using such
data would make research les reliable and sometimes such data involves manipulation by human
belongs that would lead to biases generation. It is indispensable for researcher to get primary
data for avoiding biased and existence of any misleading information. Therefore, it can be said

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
9
that using secondary data would not be adequate to conduct any study as there are many
shortcomings of such data and this would make research less reliable. Primary data tends to
provides authentic, relevant and valid data that facilitates the process of research. Researcher
should not limit their study to secondary data and including primary data in their research is
considered to be equally important or sometimes more important that secondary data. Hence,
researcher should incorporate both secondary as well as primary data in their research.
Requirement 5
Title of the research project
Exploring the nature of stakeholder engagement in an accounting firm by adopting either
Professor Shallow Viewpoint or Professor Thoughtful
Importance of research
The research will be conducted to understand the accounting perspectives and research
in-depth to get proper insights of information about reality (Smith 2017). In this research
proposal, proper emphasis will given on the area that have been introduced to systems based
accounting theories. The area that is researched in this research study is Corporate Social
Responsibility and keep a note on how far stakeholder are engaged in practicing these CSR
activities in the accounting firms (Benson et al. 2015). In this study, there is a need to agree on
the viewpoint of any one of the Professor who differs largely on matters relating to stakeholder
engagement and Corporate Social Responsibility.
Research Question
1. How far stakeholder gets engaged at the time of accountability in major firms?

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
10
2. What is the role and nature of stakeholders in any accounting firms?
3. Professor Shallow or Professor Thoughtful? Whose viewpoint can be adopted and has
relevance to the study or research?
4. How far stakeholder are engaged in practicing these CSR activities in the accounting
firms
Literature Review
As rightly put forward by Professor Shallow, he believes that stakeholder engagement is
only applicable to powerful stakeholder group (Bonin 2013). He is of the opinion to look at an
end to non-regulatory disclosures and minimize the wasteful expenses in firms. According to
him, it is important to engage more time on sustainability reporting as well as discussions of
integrated reporting. In order to further discuss the matter, Professor Thoughtful has been better
when he started talking about system-based theories, sustainability or integrated reporting in any
of the area of corporate social reporting (Sierra‐García, Zorio‐Grima and García‐Benau 2015).
According to Scott (2015), the term stakeholder came into existence in the year 1960. It
was further argued by the managers that they had to understand the concerns of stakeholders,
suppliers as well as lenders and employees for developing objectives that stakeholders can
support. Some treated stakeholder approach to be one of the significant strategic management
tools where social performance agenda had been highlighted for business (Cascetta et al. 2015).
While others treated stakeholder approach as more ethically as well as morally accepted value
approach.
By using stakeholder value approach, it was easy to understand the issue that prevails
because of stakeholder engagement as well as responsibility and need coverage at the same time.

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
11
It was pointed out then that the difficulty was noted because of differentiating moral
responsibility after calculating responsiveness as it is not mentioned in the literature (Rutherford
2016).
Some of the stakeholder theories even argue for a system of business ethics that can
possibly overlay stakeholder management mechanisms as well as stakeholder rights and
entitlements. It possibly will go beyond some of the exclusive services of the interests of
individual expertise that results in maximizing valuation of stakeholders.
It is important to understand the validity of stakeholder theory so that several questions
are answered and where ethics co-exist with the strategies used in accounting firms. These
strategies are developed for boosting the level of performance in highly competitive
environment. On analysis, it is noted that there had been a convergence between the strategy as
well as ethics that take into account economic interests of the accounting firms that concerns
stakeholder (Rinaldi, Unerman and Tilt 2014).
There had been several conflicting ideas about stakeholder as well as business ethics
literature where the relationship is present in major theme (Concannon et al. 2014). Legitimacy
of stakeholder relates about fact where an organization directly get linked with corporate social
responsiveness as well as corporate responsibility. There had been global meltdown in the
financial markets as well as widespread corporate collapse that shows relationship between
business and society as it help in designing the Business Corporation in the upcoming financial
years (Quagli, Avallone and Ramassa 2016).
This literature review explain the study by identifying key principles of stakeholders that
takes place after identifying, analyzing and engaging. It is important to incorporate these

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
12
principles into a specific management model for embedding the practice of stakeholder
engagement in the accounting firms. The theory deals with public relations practice that bridges
the gap and put emphasis upon public participation in accounting firms at the time of
undertaking strategic decision-making activities (Oseni and Ireghah 2016).
According to Ohlson (2015), integrated approach to stakeholder engagement argues with
the fact that provides benefits to the accounting firms by incorporating views of stakeholder in
final decision-making process as it help in enhancing level of organizational performance as well
as commitment at the same time. There had been noted evidence that are present in the
stakeholder as well as communication management literature about ways that enlightens
strategies of business enterprise to keep the stakeholder informed about any process of social
performance in the accounting firms (Oluwadare and Samy 2015).
Accounting theories
The accounting theory that had been used in the research study is stakeholder
engagement management framework (Mohammadi 2015). The main purpose of the model is to
explain stakeholder engagement in accounting firms. It helps in facilitating timely as well as
appropriate engagement by the business with main stakeholders present in a firm. This model
explains matters that have strategic significance to the accounting firms. It further helps in
supporting key business imperatives as well as effective management of social risks and
opportunities (Beattie 2014).

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
13
Figure: Business Case for Systematic Stakeholder Engagement in accounting firms
(Source: Lukka and Pihlanto 2014)
The application of the framework was guided by major principles that get linked with the
sustainability principles of business enterprise. The principles are as follows:
 The first principle is to respect the values of all and listen to the viewpoint of
stakeholders at the time of planning as well as decision-making process (Leyden et al.
2017)
 The key stakeholders should be given reliable, relevant as well as timely information on
matters relating to any issues, be it economical, social and environmental (Barth 2015).
 The stakeholders need to be given sufficient time, resources as well as flexibility at the
time when they participate in consultation process (Craig and Michaela 2014)
 There is should be open and honest communication between the firms and stakeholders
when they engage in any of the process by maintaining high level of integrity of actions.

Stakeholder Engagement Model
Framework Annual Review
Implementation
Implementation Communication and Training
System or Process Integration
ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
14
Figure: Stakeholder Engagement Model
(Source: Joshi and Li 2016)
The above framework had been developed to take into account stakeholder analysis as
well as centralize the stakeholder databases into two broad categories (internal and external
stakeholders). There are several supporting policies as well as guidelines that had been
developed for communicating the stakeholder engagement that include Executive (Dawkins
2014).
It is the responsibility of the stakeholder manager to assign work to the management and
maintain relationship with each of the corporate stakeholder group. To that, the process was
eventually performed by regional managers at regional level (Jones and Wells 2015). From the
viewpoint of General Manager, they had equal accountability in the stakeholder decisions that

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
15
takes place in their department. It is important for the managers to appoint stakeholder managers
who are equally responsible for maintaining effective relationships as well as internal
intelligence reporting (Baker and Burlaud 2015).
Methodology
The research approach that will be adopted by the researcher in present research study
will be qualitative that follows an action research methodology that has dual aim of action. The
first action is to bring change in accounting firms and second one is to increase the level of
understanding of the concept of stakeholder engagement that had been introduced by Professor
Thoughtful (Jiang and Penman 2013).
Here, action research will be used by the researcher as it is flexible approach and can be
used effectively for improving workplace practices in accounting firms. There are four phases in
an action research that is planning, acting, observing and reflecting upon areas in an iterative
cyclical fashion to get access to information (Deegan 2013).
Interview method will be used by the research that comes under qualitative data
collection method for getting access to information about stakeholder engagement in accounting
firms. The questions will be asked to 5 stakeholder of accounting firm. This stakeholder will be
asked 10 questions each. The research participant are the stakeholders because they are the
person who are indirectly or directly connected to the accounting firms and their engagement is
important to understand in this given research study (Huber 2015).

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
16
Interview questions
1. What is the nature of your involvement on the accounting firms that you are investing
your money in?
2. What are the main objectives of the accounting firms for the next 3 years?
3. What has been the general response from the engagement activities that can be either
positive or negative? Are we hearing anything significant that may impact the strategy of
the accounting firms?
4. Do you need to change the engagement approach in the accounting firms?
5. Are there any opportunities that we are not taking into account?
6. Is there any significant event or announcement that need detailed stakeholder
communication plan?
7. What actions could we take to address the concern of the stakeholders?
8. Do you see areas where the stakeholder engagement practices could be improve? If yes,
please recommend some of the improvement strategies.
9. Does the accounting firm have a process to keep you informed about research related
matters?
10. Do you feel your involvement was successful, positive experience and effective in any
decision-making process?
Ethics approval
It is important for the researcher to get sign in the ethical form from the research
participants before starting the interview session of this present research study (Avelé 2014). The
first step will be to assemble the application documents package. The next step will be to get the

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
17
form signed by concerned Authority (Gaffikin 2014). The third step will be risk assessment and
fourth step will be to review the ethical form provided by the researcher. The last step will be to
get notification of approval and after that the research can start with their process. The researcher
needs to abide by all the terms and conditions that are mentioned in the ethical form. The
researcher cannot force any research participants to answer all the questions. It is their interest to
answer whichever questions they like and skip that they feel is irrelevant (Gesell et al. 2017).
After signing the ethical forms, it is not compulsory for the research participant to carry out the
research even if they have no interest. The research participant can anytime leave the interview
session without prior notification. The researcher cannot ask any questions that hurt human
sentiments anyway. The researcher need to make sure that the researcher participant is
comfortable and answering the questions with interest. The researcher should not ask any
personal questions (educational credentials) that has no relevance to the research study. The
researcher cannot leak any confidential data or information that they have collected during the
interview the process. The recorded interview should be destroyed after the research is
completed and any misuse or leak of information will lead to punishable under Data Protection
Act (Henisz, Dorobantu and Nartey 2014).
Conclusion
After this research proposal, it is clearly understood how far stakeholders are engaged in
any activities that takes place in accounting firms. In the concluding statement, it was found that
Professor Thoughtful was right as he believes that stakeholder engagement links directly with
corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting in accounting firms. In the research
question, it was needed to support either of the viewpoints of two Professors so that it is clear in
understanding with the help of theories as mentioned in the literature section. Professor Shallow

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
18
had limited understanding of these accounting theories but Professor Thoughtful was an expert in
the area of CSR and was able to link properly and made the student understand the concept in
clear way on how far stakeholder engagement is linked with CSR practices.

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
19
References list:
Avelé, D., 2014. Positive accounting theory: theoretical and critical perspectives. International
Journal of Critical Accounting, 6(4), pp.396-415.
Baker, C.R. and Burlaud, A., 2015. The historical evolution from accounting theory to
conceptual framework in financial standards setting. The CPA Journal, 85(8), p.54.
Barth, M.E., 2015. Financial accounting research, practice, and financial accountability. Abacus,
51(4), pp.499-510.
Beattie, V., 2014. Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues,
theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review, 46(2),
pp.111-134.
Benson, K., Clarkson, P.M., Smith, T. and Tutticci, I., 2015. A review of accounting research in
the Asia Pacific region. Australian Journal of Management, 40(1), pp.36-88.
Bonin, H., 2013. Generational accounting: theory and application. Springer Science & Business
Media.
Cascetta, E., Carteni, A., Pagliara, F. and Montanino, M., 2015. A new look at planning and
designing transportation systems: A decision-making model based on cognitive rationality,
stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods. Transport policy, 38, pp.27-39.
Concannon, T.W., Fuster, M., Saunders, T., Patel, K., Wong, J.B., Leslie, L.K. and Lau, J., 2014.
A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-
centered outcomes research. Journal of general internal medicine, 29(12), pp.1692-1701.
Craig, D. and Michaela, R., 2014. Financial Accounting Theory.

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
20
Dawkins, C.E., 2014. The principle of good faith: Toward substantive stakeholder engagement.
Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), pp.283-295.
Deegan, C., 2013. Financial accounting theory. McGraw-Hill Education Australia.
Gaffikin, M., 2014. The Development of Accounting Theory (RLE Accounting): Significant
Contributors to Accounting Thought in the 20th Century. Routledge.
Gesell, S.B., Klein, K.P., Halladay, J., Bettger, J.P., Freburger, J., Cummings, D.M., Lutz, B.J.,
Coleman, S., Bushnell, C., Rosamond, W. and Duncan, P.W., 2017. Methods guiding
stakeholder engagement in planning a pragmatic study on changing stroke systems of care.
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1(2), pp.121-128.
Henisz, W.J., Dorobantu, S. and Nartey, L.J., 2014. Spinning gold: The financial returns to
stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), pp.1727-1748.
Huber, D., 2015. ON THE HEGEMONY OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH: A
SURVEY OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH SEEN FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE.
Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 11(1).
Jiang, G. and Penman, S., 2013. A fundamentalist perspective on accounting and implications for
accounting research. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(4), pp.233-245.
Jones, S. and Wells, M., 2015. Accounting Research: Where Now?. Abacus, 51(4), pp.572-586.
Joshi, S. and Li, Y., 2016. What Is Corporate Sustainability and How Do Firms Practice It? A
Management Accounting Research Perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research,
28(2), pp.1-11.

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
21
Leyden, K.M., Slevin, A., Grey, T., Hynes, M., Frisbaek, F. and Silke, R., 2017. Public and
Stakeholder Engagement and the Built Environment: a Review. Current Environmental Health
Reports, 4(3), pp.267-277.
Lukka, K. and Pihlanto, P., 2014. The developer of Finnish accounting theory. Twentieth
Century Accounting Thinkers (RLE Accounting), p.60.
Mohammadi, S., 2015. Full development of the theory of accounting and auditing. International
Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 3(1), pp.7-9.
Ohlson, J.A., 2015. Accounting research and common sense. Abacus, 51(4), pp.525-535.
Oluwadare, E. and Samy, M., 2015. The relevance of Critical Accounting Theory (CAT) to
effectiveness of public financial accountability in emerging economies. Canadian Social Science,
11(9), pp.20-25.
Oseni, A.I. and Ireghah, M.M., 2016. Accounting Theory Formulation as a TOOL for Enhancing
International Harmonization of Accounting Standards. Journal of Innovative Research in
Management and Humanities, 2(1).
Quagli, A., Avallone, F. and Ramassa, P., 2016. The Real Impact Factor and the Gap between
Accounting Research and Practice. FINANCIAL REPORTING.
Rinaldi, L., Unerman, J. and Tilt, C., 2014. The role of stakeholder engagement and dialogue
within the sustainability accounting and reporting process. Sustainability accounting and
accountability, pp.86-107.

ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE AND RESEARCH
22
Rutherford, B.A., 2016. Articulating accounting principles: Classical accounting theory as the
pursuit of “explanation by embodiment”. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(2),
pp.118-135.
Scott, W.R., 2015. Financial Accounting Theory 7thEdition. Canada: Pearson.
Sierra‐García, L., Zorio‐Grima, A. and García‐Benau, M.A., 2015. Stakeholder engagement,
corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: an exploratory study. Corporate Social
Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), pp.286-304.
Smith, M., 2017. Research methods in accounting. Sage.