Accounting Theory and Current Issues Name of the University Author(s)
Verified
Added on 2023/04/22
|17
|4015
|185
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Accounting Theory and Current Issues Name of the Student Name of the University Authors Note Course ID
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Executive summary: According to the discussions held in the report, IFRS practices are reducing the financial position of the company as this is not focusing on the qualitative analysis of the financial data. Additionally, the report is also concerned about the Australian Government who should not implement new change inCorporation Act. Asset revaluation is another important aspect which is being discussed here. Asset impairment of BHP Billiton is also highlighted here. Lastly, this discussion highlights the facts related to the lease standards and limitation of the former lease standards.
3ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Requirement iv.....................................................................................................................12 Requirement v......................................................................................................................13 Conclusion................................................................................................................................13 References:...............................................................................................................................14
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Introduction The purpose of this report is to highlight the objectives and functionalities of different accounting theories along with different account issues. This report is subjected to five different segments as objectives of this paper. First part is consisting the analysis of different financial practices those are not present in recent functions of IFRS. The second part is aiming to discuss the objective of Australian Government to amendCorporations Actvia the accounting theories (Henderson et al., 2015). The third part is all about the review of the choice of owner of firms for evaluating the property, plant and equipment (PPE). Apart from these three account theories those have vital impact on the second part of this report are public interest theory, capture theory and economic interest group theory, hence the impacts and benefits of these theories are influencing theCorporations Act. Assessment A Financial reporting is a key point for the users who indulge themselves for nurturing thefinancialinformation.Thefinancialqualitativecharacteristicsarenothingbutthe relevance and obliged representation (Macve, 2015). Beside this the expanded financial characteristics are understanding the fundamental facts of financial facts , verification of the financial aspects, suitability of facts those are being presented in financial discussions and on top of all these the comparability of all discussed facts. This report is going to discuss all opinions of financial reporting practices of IFRS from different individual perspectives and these individuals will be expressing their concerns. According to the former AXA head, Geoff Roberts has taken the responsibility of analysing the financial reports of the firm and this will be helpful in classifying the financial investment characteristics. This specific distinctive feature helps the firm in understanding the greater aspects of investment with respect to the company objectives (Khan, 2015). The
5ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES financial reporting practices of IFRS is a mixture of different features though it fails in making the financial investors understand about the financial reports those are prepared for classifyingthecompany’sfinancialinvestmentfeatures.Hence,thisisimpactingthe companies who are following the method of financial investment objectives of IFRS. As per the statement of Terry Brown, lesser the knowledge is for financial accounting theories, the more it will harmful for the investors who are spending time for interpreting the IFRS accounting of certain companies (Hoitash et al., 2017). This particular instinct also proves that the IFRS accounting processes have less understandable features in terms of investments.AccordingtoTerryBrownthebasictechnicalknowledgeanyfinancial accounting theory should be clear concise to the investors along with their user in terms of understanding the facts, rules oriented to their investment policies and characterization of assets where they are investing money and classification of aspects where they should invest and where they should not (Lafond et al., 2016). Therefore, absence of these factors in IFRS theory misleads the user along with the investors while taking part in some investments and performance improving facts. David Craig express his concern through this fact the investors and user are not focusing on the financial information under the IFRS practices in companies as this is making the financial process complicated for them. This particular aspect highlights that the IFRS practice are not satisfying qualitative characteristics of financial information (Dutta & Patatoukas,2016).Companiescanmaketheirexistencethroughrelevantfinancial information as it strengthens their position and faithful information makes company pretend that they are actually using relevant financial data. David Craig wanted to highlight this fact that the companies are lacking behind in showing the relevant and faithful nature in their financial investments under the IFRS reporting practices.
6ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES The above explained sections are mentioning a single objective- financial firms required the needful information about their financial resources to fulfil their aims in preparing the financial reporting. Consequently, without the qualitative financial reporting practices, following this particular objective is completely impossible. Assessment B PublicInterestTheory:Thistheoryhighlightsthefactsthatthesolutionshouldbe economically feasible enough to satisfy the business needs. There are particular regulations those are published for this very reason. Hence, public wellbeing is the important concern in establishing this theory (Campbell et al., 2018). The concerned condition can be judged with respect to this theory as the public’s wellbeing is included in to this. Apart from this new regulations can also be included to the existing corporate act. According to this theory, companies generally neglect the social and environmental responsibilities; hence a new regulation is needed for ensuring the compatibility with public interests. Hence, this theory supports establishment of new regulation inCorporations Act. Capture Theory: According to the principle of capture theory, the regulators are eligible for changing the objectives of the existing regulators and also they can establish particular regulations for the need of public (Chychyla et al., 2018). Hence, the regulators can only satisfy their needs after certain period of establishing these regulations. Here comes the benefit of capture theory which shows the actual interest behind the establishment of a new regulation from the regulator end. Additionally this is also possible for the regulators to identify the groups which are gaining benefit over the new regulations developed (Beaumont, 2015). We can now discuss the factual basis of the implication of Capture theory with respect to the concerned scenario here which shows it is not beneficial to modify the Corporations Actasthiscanbemanipulatedaftercertainperiodoncethepersonalneedismet.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Consequentlythemarketforceswillbemakingthecompaniesresponsibleforthe environmental and social benefits of their own. Economic Interest Group Theory of Regulation: The economic interest group theory of regulation states that different policies can easily impact the regulations and these are operated through the demand and supply chain features. In accordance with this theory the government comes under the category for supply and the investors incur the functions for demands. Government of any country establishes different set of regulations for the benefit of common people along with several business industries (Warren & Jones, 2018). Hence, government ismain entitywho pushes the businessindustriesto followtheirset of regulations that they can modify at any point of time. This discussion supports the fact of Australian Government who takes the decision in introducing the regulations in Corporation Act which satisfies business as well as environmental responsibilities (Mullinova, 2016). This fact will ensure the objective of wellbeing of the common people along with the business objectives. However, this theory includes the consumers in the process of making the development of the regulations. Hence this particulartheory will indulge the development of regulations for business as well as common people. Apart from this, it will also help in keeping equal balance in between business and consumer needs. Assessment C Requirement a According to the situations in the financial market this can be stated that the business organizations are adopting this culture of not protecting the needs of consumers and they mostly focusing on their objective related to cost-model. In addition to these facts this can be also highlighted that there is possibility that the assets may increase and may decrease as well (Schipper et al., 2017). Depending on the increase the shareholders decides the financial
8ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES leverage ratio to be fixed. There are specific motivations that change the mind of firm directors for not doing their revaluation of PPE. Huge associated cost feature is one of the important motivations that influence the investors in revaluing their PPE. The huge revaluation charge may increase the company’s expenditure which will be directly impacting on their profit margin. These charges may include time to complete the revaluation, cost to manage this revaluation process and the fees which is paid for managing the revaluation officers (Downs, 2017). Second important motivation for the shareholders in not revaluating the assets is revaluation of assets is considered as the blockage in maintaining the traditional costing policies involved within the revaluation process. This happens as the historical costing process is still considered as the best policy to revaluate the assets and this provides less scope of manipulation of assets. Requirement b There are chances that the financial statement of a company might get affected for decision of not revaluating the assets. First chance is, the revaluation might stop the increment or decrement of the number of asset in the financial statement of the company (Elliott, 2017). This situation may create abnormal profit or loss amount when the asset will be deposed to the market. This might also create such situations where the asset value will be lesser in balance sheet while being compared to the market value. Requirement c As per the discussion held in the last part of this report, this can be identified that the decision of not to revaluating the assets can lead to diminishing wealth of the company and this may impact the shareholder in a negative aspect (Klychova et al., 2015). The company may lose the faith of their shareholders as the shareholders will be unhappy about the return from the investments, because of the company’s decreasing profit margin. Additionally, the
9ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES shareholders will not be able to judge the actual value of their company asset as the process revaluation will not be present in the company. These consequences are nothing but the impact of not revaluating the assets for companies who are using assets for building their positions in the financial market. Assessment D Requirement i The annual report of BHP Billiton for the year ended 2018 provides the information relating to the impairment of its non-current assets. As evident from the annual report BHP Billiton has carried out an impairment testing for all its assets where an indication of impairment is available (Barron et al., 2016). For the impairment purpose the goodwill has been tested on yearly basis. On noticing that the assets value is greater than the recoverable value, the asset is impaired and the loss of impairment is charged to profit and loss account. The total amount of impairment from its continuing information for the year stood $2,353 which included the goodwill and other intangible assets. The information is available under notes 10 of the annual report. Requirement ii: The impairment testing is performed by BHP Billiton when it is indication of impairment. The impairment testing is conduced when the amount of assets is exceeding the recoverable amount (Bhp.com 2019). BHP Billiton impairs the assets and the loss originating from impairment is charged to the statement of income in order to lower down the carrying amount into the balance sheet to its recoverable amount.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Requirement iii: As understood from the annual report of BHP Billiton, the company has not recorded any impairment expenses as there was no impairment performed during the year 2018. Requirement iv: According to the BHP Billiton the estimations and assumptions might change when the new information is available. After commencing the development activity, the judgement is made for the development assets is impaired and the appropriate amount is written off in the statement of profit and loss account (Bhp.com 2019). For the purpose of determining the impairment, BHP Billiton groups the assets at their lowest level and these assets are separately identified in the cash flows. While for the intangible assets if there quoted market price is not available estimations are made regarding the present value of future after tax cash flows. (Source: Bhp.com 2019) Requirement v: As evident from the 2018 annual report of BHP Billiton the impairment process has been carried out by adhering with the AASB 39 impairment and the auditors have not expressed any concern regarding the impairment testing performed (Bhp.com 2019). There is no involvement of subjectivity in carrying out the impairment testing.
11ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES OntheeventofanysubjectivityorinfluenceBHPBillitonmightnotrepresentthe impairment testing of its assets based on the reason that it can reduce the carrying amount of theassetin thebalancesheet.Thismaynotenabletheinvestorsfrommakingany investments. Requirement vi: The interesting part of information provided is the impairment account that provides a detailed information regarding the impairment performed its non-current assets and other intangible assets by laying down the amount of impairment in a column wise. While the confusing part is that the information may not provide the investors to obtain the actual view of lease impairment that is not discussed in the annual report in a detailed manner. Requirement vii From the information gained it is understood that BHP Billiton makes the appropriate estimations and judgements regarding the quoted market price of its intangible assets and the after tax cash flows generated. All this aspects results in the subjectivity of impairment testing procedure. Requirement viii According to the IFRS 13 fair value refers to the price that would be obtained following the sale of the asset or the amount that is paid for transferring a liability in the form of orderly transactions amid the market participants based on their measurement date (Stice et al., 2015). Assessment E Requirement i According to the former lease standard, there is obligation to be followed by the companies where they should classify their lease policies as operating or finance lease, along
12ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES with this they should not add their lease their lease in their balance sheet (Stockenstrand & Nilsson, 2017). This helps the companies in keeping their position in a good way they don’t have to show their materialistic actual leases in balance sheet. Requirement ii Long term operating leases are impactful liabilities for the company and also they face several changes in their financial position because of these liabilities (Trotman & Carson, 2018). As per the scenario getting discussed here, many of the retail companies are having huge liabilities that they are not showing in their balance sheet which is maintaining their financial position in the market. Apart from this, the lease liabilities are 66 percent more than the balance sheet liabilities in actual scenarios. Requirement iii The lease amount for an aircraft company will be higher than bearing their own expenses in making an aircraft fleet. Hence, the first company should their lease liabilities in their balance sheet which is not happening in the former lease standards (Larson et al., 2017). The benefit of this policy is that all the companies are being treated as same amount of good will they are having. Therefore, each company is not at all getting a fair chance to prove their workefficiencyaccordingtothechallengestheyareincorporatingintheirfinancial development period. Requirement iv According to the chairperson of IASB, companies needs to bear the cost for creating new lease standards. Additionally, they are liable to show the liable lease amount they have incurred in their business which will reduce their financial position in market (Baker & Burlaud, 2015). Hence, these reasons might cause the unpopularity of the company in terms of the market evaluation process.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
13ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Requirement v First reason to be highlighted is the investors will be able to know the assets their companies are operating as lease liabilities and also they will come across their right to use those assets for the betterment of the company (Hoyle et al., 2015). This will be helpful for the investors and shareholders for judging the financial position of their companies in terms of assets and liabilities. Conclusion This can be concluded that the financial practices of IFRS have several disadvantages in real scenario where the company face challenges as they are facing issues in terms of shareholderknowledge,asthefinancialpracticeisincompatibleofprovidingfaithful representation, understandability and relevant financial data. Apart from this, the above discussion is also elaborating about the fact that the government should not make any changes to the Corporation Act as this is reducing the chance of making balance in between consumer and business process. Consequently, BHP Billiton did not reported about the impairment loss, they considered the different methods of testing impairments and they proceeded with that. At the end of discussion we found that the establishment of new lease standards is benefitting the companies in improving their financial reporting standards.
14ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES References: Baker, C. R., & Burlaud, A. (2015). The historical evolution from accounting theory to conceptual framework in financial standards setting.The CPA Journal,85(8), 54. Barron, O. E., Chung, S. G., & Yong, K. O. (2016). The effect of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 Fair Value Measurements on analysts’ information environment.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,35(4), 395-416. Beaumont, S. J. (2015). An investigation of the short‐and long‐run relations between executive cash bonus payments and firm financial performance: a pitch.Accounting & Finance,55(2), 337-343. Bhp.com (2019). Retrieved from https://www.bhp.com/-/media/documents/investors/annual- reports/2018/bhpannualreport2018.pdf Campbell, J. L., Khan, U., & Pierce, S. (2018). The effect of mandatory disclosure on market inefficiencies: Evidence from Statement of Financial Accounting Standard Number 161.Columbia Business School Research Paper, (17-94). Chychyla, R., Leone, A. J., & Minutti-Meza, M. (2018). Complexity of financial reporting standards and accounting expertise.Journal of Accounting and Economics. Downs, L. C. (2017). Financial Accounting. Dutta, S., & Patatoukas, P. N. (2016). Identifying conditional conservatism in financial accounting data: theory and evidence.The Accounting Review,92(4), 191-216. Elliott, B. (2017).Financial Accounting and Reporting 18th Edition. Pearson Higher Ed. Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K., & Howieson, B. (2015).Issues in financial accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.
15ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U., & Yezegel, A. (2017). The Effect of Accounting Reporting Complexity on Financial Analysts. Hoyle, J. B., Schaefer, T., & Doupnik, T. (2015).Advanced accounting. McGraw Hill. Khan, M. (2015). Accounting: Financial. InEncyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Third Edition-5 Volume Set(pp. 1-6). Routledge. Klychova, G. S., Fakhretdinova, E. N., Klychova, A. S., & Antonova, N. V. (2015). Development of accounting and financial reporting for small and medium-sized businessesinaccordancewithinternationalfinancialreportingstandards.Asian Social Science,11(11), 318. Lafond, C. A., McAleer, A. C., & Wentzel, K. (2016). Enhancing the Link between TechnologyandAccountinginIntroductoryCourses:EvidenceFrom Students.Journal of the Academy of Business Education,17. Larson, M. P., Lewis, T. K., & Spilker, B. C. (2017). A case integrating financial and tax accounting using the balance sheet approach to account for income taxes.Issues in Accounting Education,32(4), 41-49. Macve, R. (2015).A Conceptual Framework for Financial Accounting and Reporting: Vision, Tool, Or Threat?. Routledge. Mullinova, S. (2016). Use of the principles of IFRS (IAS) 39" Financial instruments: recognitionandassessment"forbankfinancialaccounting.ModernEuropean Researches, (1), 60-64. Schipper, K., Francis, J., & Weil, R. (2017).Financial Accounting: Introduction to Concepts, Methods and Uses. Cengage Learning.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
16ACCOUNTING THEORY AND CURRENT ISSUES Stice, E. K., Stice, J. D., Albrecht, W. S., Swain, M. R., Duh, R. R., & Hsu, A. W. (2015). Financial Accounting-IFRS Edition. Stockenstrand, A. K., & Nilsson, F. (Eds.). (2017).Bank Regulation: Effects on Strategy, Financial Accounting and Management Control(Vol. 19). Taylor & Francis. Trotman, K., & Carson, E. (2018).Financial accounting: an integrated approach. Cengage AU. Warren, C., & Jones, J. (2018).Corporate financial accounting. Cengage Learning.