Administrative or policy issues in the US by Trump government recently

Running Head: Urban Public Administration 1
Administrative or policy issues in the US by Trump government recently

2
Introduction
As soon as Donald Trump elected and moved in the white house, a long series of both
foreign policies and radical domestic reversals are made. The president even tried to bring
many changes in the American administrative policies. The commander-in-chief of Trump
government has also viewed by undoing few of the signature achievements of Barack Obama,
including Obamacare. Before that Trump has also tried to scrap the signature healthcare
reforms of Mr. Obama that are known as a complete and entire disaster (Abadie, Diamond &
Hainmueller, 2014). He had even promised that laws would also get replaced through
undertaking the new measures simultaneously and got replaced and these changes will be
reflected soon. This paper will discuss about the administrative policy of America, in which
few policies will be changed by Trump government as per their plan. From the available
policies, Trump government is planning to dismantle Obamacare policy that will impact
many people of America, who don’t have healthcare insurance. The policy is also discussed
with the help of theory.
Administrative policy
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) 79-404, 60 Stat. 237, was enacted in the
year 1946, is considered as the American federal statute, which assists in governing the
manner in which agencies of administration of federal government in the United States might
try to propose as well as set up the regulations. For protecting the citizen, it is analysed that
APA was also granted with the judiciary over every action of the agency. It’s referred as one
of the most significant parts of American administrative laws, and this act came as a law in
the year 1946. The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is implemented by both the
independent agencies as well as federal executive departments. According to Pat McCarran,
senator of U. S, which had mentioned APA as the bill of rights for many Americans, whose

3
affairs are regulated or either controlled through the agencies of federal government (Ahearn,
Williamson & Black, 2015). The APA text can be explored at Title 5 of U.S Code, in starting
of Section 500.
This is same as Model State Administrative Procedure Act that was mainly drafted
through the Uniform State Laws or National Conference of Commissioners, to omit the state
agencies (Ahearn, Williamson & Black, 2015). Not every state has implemented the
wholesale model law by the year 2017. The APA federal don’t require to have the systematic
regulations oversight after the adoption of Model APA.
The legal framework of Administrative law, working in the public administration is
initiated. It is attained through the requirement to develop and create the public
administration system as per law. It’s a concept that can be compared with other previous
notion of justice as per the law (Amato & Schreiber, 2013). As administrative includes the
power exercise through the executive government arm, administrative law is related to
political, constitutional, along with juridical. There is no universally recognized definition
related to administrative law, but importantly it might be considered for covering the powers,
organization, duties, as well as functions described with public authorities of every type,
which is connected with administration; their connection with each other and with
nongovernmental bodies and citizens; legal ways for controlling the administration of public,
along with liabilities and rights of officials (Anderson, 2014).
Administrative law is at colossal extent complemented by the laws of the constitution,
and it is noted that the line between is quite challenging to draw (Angell, 2013). The national
legislature organization, court structures, cabinet characteristics, along with the head of the
state role is primarily considered as the purpose of the constitutional law, in which both the
procedural and substantive procedures are linked with local and central governments, as well

4
as judicial, administrative review, that relates with administrative law. In some issues like
ministers, responsibility can never be assigned exclusively as per constitutional or
administrative laws (Arnold, 2013). According to American jurist, administrative law is
referred as the constitutional law parts.
The law associated with the education, health, public services and housing can be
primarily considered under the administrative law, but due to the sheer bulk, it is most of the
time referred as ancillary (Auster, Wylie & Valente, 2005).
In America, Donald Trump is presiding over the devastating, withering as well as
trenchant attack over the administrative state of America, which is every seen by this nation.
The administrative state, which is also known as the modern American government pillars is
linked with creating and enforcing the environmental and economic regulations, running and
designing of social welfare programs, fighting corruption and crime, and offering national
defence and many more (Bailey & Chorniy, 2016).
In the last nine months, the government of Trump had made its aim and bulled its eye.
Beyond public gaze, the government of Trump has tried to roll back, rescinded as well as
reverse many environmental, transportation, labour, education, consumer protection and food
and drug regulations (Baker & Jorgensen, 2015). Liberty hugely improves the deregulatory
efforts, which create issues over the health, safety and Americans welfare, which is not
mentioned as for right for rest of the world that rely on America for combatting towards
banking and security frauds, global warming and exploitation of employees (Baker &
Jorgensen, 2015). Simultaneously, Trump is trying to slander the bureaucracy, the sizeable
political community, officials that work for designing and demanding the compliance with
the regulations of administration through congressional designs as well as long-time

5
practices, impulsive, proper position to respond, and issues related with directing the sudden,
abusive as well as hyper-partisan president (Barker, Pistrang & Elliot, 2015).
In America, Donald Trump is the first president that had railed against all the
administrative states or had made promises to offer substantial federal bureaucracy
downsizing, but so far it’s still referred as unflinching. But in various aspects, the rollback of
instant policy and recession are not the crucial ones. Trump has taken no steps for
deregulating it. Trump along with his lieutenants are also trying to damage the regulation
machinery to certain extent, which cannot be swing back into action by federal agencies, as
they are not so capable of doing so, when outcry bust over environment, health and safety
protections and labour propel towards the pro-regulation in the office of American president
(Bates, Suchi, Ohno-Machado, Shah & Escobar, 2014). According to consumer protection,
all the subsidiaries, which were under the act of Obamacare are wiped out by the present
government. All the federal funds were given to the insurance firms, in order to provide them
with cheap plans for the people living below poverty line. Trump in his tenure has abolished
the Obamacare in the month of October, and in the result of that, premiums over the cheap
plans have increased from 7to 38%. According to Congressional Budget Office, it is
calculated that this action will add around $194 billion over the federal deficit by the year
2026 (Behara & Gunderson, 2015). It still exists a chance. Nevertheless, Congress will try to
refund all the funds. After the dismantling of this policy, employers had refused to include
the birth control under the insurance policy. In contrast with the actual rules of Obamacare,
all the employers can now quickly go for paying for taking contraceptives for their staff
through claiming that they have religious and moral objections. After the dismantling of this
policy, many women might lose to have access to take contraceptives (Belatti, Pugely,
Phisitkul, Anedola & Callaghan, 2014). The American government is also ready to pay for

6
the legal fees for the community, which had previously used the administration of Obama for
attaining the mandate to take a turn.
Policy issues in the US by Trump government recently
Policy Aim
The aim of this policy is quite simple to extend, where the coverage of health
insurance to an individual extent is calculated to around 15% of the total population of
America that lack it. People who didn’t receive the insurance coverage through their
employers are not included in the health programme of America for elderly and poor were
part of Obamacare. To attain this, the law needs that every American should have their health
insurance, but it provides subsidies for covering the affordable (Bernardi, 2014). It also aims
to minimize the price of insurance through bringing young, as well as healthy people in the
system of medical coverage. It also needs that businesses having mor0e than 50 employees
should provide this health insurance.
This law aims to create the marketplace, which is run by states over the websites that
are akin towards online shopping and travel sites, where individuals can quickly try to
compare the cost when they shop for covering it. Individual states had not taken part in ACA,
and the community residing there can easily buy the online market plan through the help of
federal government (Blavin, Shartzer, Long & Holahan, 2014). Along with this, the law had
tried to ban the companies of insurance through denying them with offering health coverage
to individuals having the pre-health conditions, permitting the young people to stay over the
plans of parents till they get 26, and then afterwards expand the eligibility towards the
government-run programme of Medicaid health for poor and elderly people. The aim of this
law eventually has gone little slow for the expansion of healthcare spending in America that
is highest all over the world (Bloodgood & Morrow, 2003).