logo

Fair Value versus Historical Cost Accounting: A debate that has not changed

   

Added on  2020-07-22

13 Pages3631 Words48 Views
 | 
 | 
 | 
Advance Financial AccountingReport
Fair Value versus Historical Cost Accounting: A debate that has not changed_1

Fair Value versus Historical Cost Accounting: A debate that has not changed_2

INTRODUCTIONThe variety between fair value and historical cost accounting is the one which is highlydebated components in an accounting literature. While debate on these two topic started from1930s, which is still disturbed (Macve, 2015). One disorder is move debate forward which isdeficiency of sign on the selection between these aforementioned accounting practices, whenselection a quasi-experiment rooted in the current essential consideration of the InternationalFinancial Reporting Standard to learning the “market solution for selection between historicalcost and appropriate value accounting approaches. The current setting which exploits IFRSimplementation that has a precious distinction from Australia, UK, and US settings implementedbefore going to have research. The selection between historical and fair value is that thecompany is moving forward to make their business objectives in an effective manner (Rajgopaland Venkatachalam, 2011). 1. Fair value measurement implements to IFRSs which needs to enable FVM and renders aindividual IFRS framework for calculating fair value and needs releases about the FVM. TheStandard elaborates fair value on the basis of an “exit price’ notion and implements a “FVH”.The standard elaborates fair value by relying of an “exit price” notion and implements a “fairvalue hierarchy”, which emerge in the market based, instead of entity-specific, measurement.The fair value hierarchy emerges to enhance reliability in the FVM and connectedreleases via “FVH” the hierarchy classified the inputs applied in the valuation tools into threelevels (Hoyle, Schaefer and Doupnik, 2015). The hierarchy renders the maximum importance tocited prices in active markets for resemble assets or liabilities and the lower priority tounobservable inputs.Measurement of fair value: The main aim of a FVM is to forecast the price under which anarranged transaction to offer the asset or to transfer responsibility which will take place betweenmarket participants during the measurement date as per the current market conditions. Anadequate value measurement needs an entity to elaborates of all of the below mentioned: The particular asset or liability which is the subject of the measurement.For a non-financial asset, valuation basis which is adequate for the measurement. Principle market for the asset or liability.1
Fair Value versus Historical Cost Accounting: A debate that has not changed_3

Valuation tools are adequate for the extent, adopting the accessibility of the data withwhich to grow inputs which characterizes the assumptions that market contributors willimplement at the pricing of assets or liability and of the fair value hierarchy under whichthe inputs are segregated. 2. It has been recognised that the intangibles can be critically and potentially affect firms’financial policies. At the time of initial recognition fixed asset are known at cost of production.In self-made or acquisition price, if this is acquired abroad, the costs incurred aftercommissioning to increase productivity (Hope, Thomas and Vyas, 2013). The maintenance costor other related asset will improve the productivity and enhance their productivity capacity costsshall be considered an expense, there are modifications on the subsequent valuation of thatcomprise non- current assets which permits. Benefits:1.The process of determining the fair value of tangible fixed assets appropriately adjustedprice or a less active market adjusted changes in economic condition (Mulford andComiskey, 2011).2.Challenges:If the fair value increases, then in that case, the equity get transfer in a balanceitem for revaluation surplus and vice-versaIf the reduction in fair value occurred, it will in general in the income statement.If the reduction in the value is a reversal account, if the loss exceeds this amount.Then in that case, it will be charge to income statement. It can-not exists anegative revaluation reserve for a particular asset.3. Valuation tools are adequate in the conditions and for which efficient data are accessible tocalculate fair value, optimising the use of concerned observable inputs and lowering theapplication of unobservable inputs (Dyreng, Mayew and Williams, 2012).The objective of implementing a valuation tools is to forecast the price under whichsystematic transaction to offer the asset or to relocate the liability will take place between market2
Fair Value versus Historical Cost Accounting: A debate that has not changed_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Foundations of Accounting : Assignment
|11
|2524
|70

Historical Cost Accounting vs. Fair Value
|10
|2715
|43

Foundations in Accounting: Fair Value Accounting vs. Historical Cost Accounting
|11
|2626
|132

Understanding IFRS 13: Fair Value Measurement
|7
|1204
|78

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
|7
|1269
|356

Financial Accounting Concepts and Practices
|16
|4308
|76