ADVANCE INFORMATICS PEER REVIEW POST1
Hi ..........,
It is very encouraging for me to reply to your responses as in each session, you provide
some research and data that enhances my knowledge about the topic. Your previous review
article about two healthcare applications was insightful and while replying to my peer review
comments you again have included several information regarding healthcare intervention and
patient outcome which is very insightful.
You talked about the role of nursing professionals in society and I agree that this is the
profession that people trust the most hence, it is our duty to fulfill those trust and belief of
numerous people we provide interventions to (Bakken & Mead, 1996). Further, we should
utilize our duty to enhance the patient literacy and using our knowledge so that non-
pharmacological EHRs can also become useful in the healthcare system. I strongly agree to your
point regarding the less reliability of non-pharmacological interventions in the form of mobile
applications or websites that provide generalized interventions to people irrespective of their
health conditions (Bakken & Mead, 1996).
However, in your reply, I am unable to find out the answers of the questions I raised
against the two consumer health connectivity tools the period tracker app and What to expect app
you discussed in the previous review section. I discussed that these two applications are useful in
tracking menstrual cycle and help women to understand the appropriate conceiving time and
time to avoid pregnancy (Moglia et al., 2016). However, as the healthcare applications were
developed by some non-pharmacological organizations, the usage were limited to general
prospects and lacked the situations such as untimed period tracking and related pregnancy and
conceiving time. Furthermore, these applications also questioned the interventions provided by

+13062052269

info@desklib.com

Peer Review and Health Literacy: A Critical Analysis

Contribute Materials

Related Documents