Advanced Financials: Relevance of Financial Reporting Standards and Theories of Regulation

This article discusses the relevance of financial reporting standards and theories of regulation in advanced financials. It covers topics such as the Public Interest Theory, Capture Theory, and Economic Interest Group Theory of Regulation. It also talks about the importance of revaluation of assets and its impact on financial statements.

Running head: ADVANCED FINANCIALS
ADVANCED FINANCIALS
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1ADVANCED FINANCIALS
Table of Contents
Assessment Part A...........................................................................................................................2
Assessment Part B...........................................................................................................................4
Assessment Part C...........................................................................................................................6
Assessment Part D...........................................................................................................................7
References......................................................................................................................................10

2ADVANCED FINANCIALS
Assessment Part A
The article named “Unwieldy rules useless for investors”, states that the current financial
accounting standards and the IFRS are not fit enough to given the legislation and they have
stated a wide variety of reasons behind it. According to Mao and Renneboog (2015), the
financial reporting’s serves various objectives which are given as follows:
1. They have the capability of providing information while making investment decisions
2. They also help in assessment of cash flows
3. They help in analysis of the business structure if the organization (Bentley, Omer and
Sharp 2013).
The conceptual framework of a financial report must consist of the given points:
 The financial statements needs to be relevant in nature and they will be able to change the
decision made by the investors.
 They should have the ability to be compared. This comparison may take place with
respect to the statements of the same year or of another year. Statements of the other
industries might also be compared accordingly (Wang 2014).
 They need to possess the quality of faithful representation and be true in nature. This
means that the statements need to portray the actual condition. The financial statements
do not need to lie about anything and for this purpose, they need to be complete. There
must also exist prudence in the statements which assist during judgements to be made.

3ADVANCED FINANCIALS
 The financial statements need to be available on time (Scott 2015). They will hold no
power to assist any investor in case where the time has already passed. The decision
makers will be requires o take effective decision based on their requirements.
 The financial statements need to possess clarity as well. This means that when the
investors are making use of it then they should be understandable for all.
If these characteristics are not present, the financial statements go useless. As these
concepts need to be present, the given article shares views which are consistent with the view
that the financial reports need to possess the given points and it is important for it to given useful
information to the different users in regard to assets, liabilities and income statements (Brown,
Preiato and Tarca 2014). However, it has also been stated in the article that the stated qualitative
characteristics of the financial reporting are not covered under the IFRS and official reporting
standards. The given standards are irrelevant and misleading which do not serve their purpose.
They lack comparability aspects as well which makes decision making difficult.
Hence, thereby arises a need to improve the given standard and ensure that the financial
reports of the different corporates satisfies the above mentioned points and requirements so that
it is ensured that the requirements of all the stakeholders are solved adequately.

4ADVANCED FINANCIALS
Assessment Part B
The Public Interest Theory
According to the given theory on Public Interest, there lies an assumption that the capital
market does not operate in thee desired manner and that additional importance is given to the
different members in an industry rather than giving importance to the members of the society.
Hence, for this reason, it is important for the public to keep a check on the different operations of
the market and ensure that they perform in favor of the general public as well. For this reason,
the public interest theory was formed by A.C.Pigou in 1932. In the given theory, it was stated
that the public needs to be aware about these situations and it is increasingly important for them
to ensure that there exists no unethical or mal practices. It is the primary responsibility of a
regulation to ensure that the society’s interest is held and the government works towards their
welfare. The regulatory body in charge needs to ensure that the practices of the organization are
in line with the practices of the firm and that the interest of the society is upheld.
A theory stated by Stigler, states the exact opposite of this and it is given that, the
efficiency of the different theories is not as important as the fact that the private enterprises make
use of the regulations as a barrier for the new firms who are primarily interest in joining the
organization (Barth, Landsman and Lang 2008). The main problem in the given scenario is that
when the different firms disclose the information about the working of their organizations then
they do not portray all the integral sets of information but only the financial ones.

5ADVANCED FINANCIALS
The given theory makes it important for the different firms to portray the financial as well
as non-financial aspects which will elaborate upon the harmful activities conducted by the
organization and their impacts on the organization in general (Weil, Schipper and Francis 2013).
They need to be regulated upon the kind of initiatives which should be taken and how the
harmful impacts may be mitigated.
The general public also needs to be made aware about these initiatives so that they are
easily able to understand and read the related rules online as well.
Capture theory
The capture theory states that the different workers working for the welfare for a given
industry tend to work and safeguard the interests of the industry. The people involved in the
industry often go to the extent of contributing towards the jeopardizing the distribution of
resources and manipulate them (Teixeira 2014). The given theory states that the workers in an
industry tend to form relationships with the ones working in the governmental agencies and
through this they tend to manipulate them in order to get certain favors for their organization
(Ball 2006). The employees are bribed and the governmental agencies tend to work towards
framing of rules, regulations and other such policies like control of quality and quantity,
operating activity regulation and employees` protection standards in the favor of them. The
industry has the possession of such experts who have profound knowledge and tend to gain
adequate information from the governmental agencies who then tend to become the informers in
hope of favors. These areas are the one where the governmental organizations are stated to be
captured by the workers in the industry.
Economic interest group theory of regulation

6ADVANCED FINANCIALS
The given economic interest group theory states that there exists different groups in an
industry and that these industries tend to form a cluster and use their economic powers in order
to influence the various people in order to seek their self-interest. These groups are often in a
competition with one another (Ahmed, Neel and Wang 2013). They tend to use this power in
order to motivate the employees to make use of these economic powers to influence the decision
making of the government and see to it that the government makes decisions which are
beneficial for the purpose of the organization. These groups tend to function in their own interest
and do not consider the public`s interest in consideration (Weygandt, Kimmel and Kieso 2015).
Their decision making tends to take over the decision of the government and their own interest of
getting reelected tends to make them make laws in favor of the groups. The monetary power is
used by them and they tend to change the legislation in their favor. These legislations may
include legislations like violation of social and environmental laws. The government on the other
hand will not be able do anything as they are under the industrialist. This can be described as the
vicious cycle of the relationship between the Government and the industry.
Assessment Part C
Revaluation of the assets is considered to be an essential part of an organization and this
is what the FASB Statement No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, talks about. According to the given law, the different organizations are not allowed to
conduct the revaluation of their assets and instead they are required to take into account the
impairment costs of their non-current assets (Nobes 2014). These given rules have been stated
down because they assist in the revaluation of the assets which is actually not allowed, but
instead the firms are supposed to take into impairment costs into consideration. These rules have

7ADVANCED FINANCIALS
been present in order to determine relevance and represents faithfulness of the different financial
statements in the United States and countries. However, the impairment costs which are required
to be added tend to reduce the profitability of the company but do not have an impact on the net
cash balance (Leuz and Wysocki 2016). The given rules are present because they support a better
picture with respect to the ongoing activities which take place in an organization and help the
investors in making better decisions. However, in the given scenario, the historical cost
perspectives are completely ignored in these statements and the amount of depreciation which is
carried forward and adjusted annually keeps changing.
Discussed above were the impacts of the US Financial Standards Board`s impact on the
importance and relevance of the financial statements in US.
Assessment Part D
Part A:
The true value of an asset cannot be identified in case the revaluation of an asset has not
been done. Hence, revaluation goes a long way in helping a company to find the correct value.
The reasons why the revaluation takes place has been given as follows:
 They help in the reflection of true and fair value of the chosen assets
 They reflect the correct rate of return of capital which has been employed currently
 When an acquisition is about to take place, it assists in the negotiation with respect to the
pricing of the asset (Williams 2014).
 It helps during the sales of the particular essay
 It also contributes towards decreasing the debt equity ratio of the organization.

8ADVANCED FINANCIALS
Although revaluation has the stated advantages, many companies are not in favor of
conducting the business because of the following reasons and they often choose to select the cost
model. The reasons are given as follows:
 It reduces the satisfaction level of the investor. In cases where the assets are revalued then
the profit of the firm tends to go down which is not favorable from the side of the
investor. Hence, when the investors view the reduced profit of the company, it helps in
reduced satisfaction (Lequiller and Blades 2014).
 The revaluation of the asset ignores the historical cost perspective. When the assets are
lowered in price it leads to further reduction in the profits which ultimately has a bad
effect on the sustainability of the organization.
 Conducting revaluation gives rise to higher liquidity in the value of the assets. The assets
are quite volatile in nature and tend to fluctuate by larger amounts. This causes incomes
which may not be true and may portray false losses as well.
After reflecting upon the given reasons, the directors of the firm do not want to revalue
the assets.
Part B:
In case the assets of an organization are not valued effectively, the following may be the
impacts. First of all, the organization may not be able portray the true and fair image of the
organization. Secondly, due to this, the rate of capital will also not be an honest one. The debt
equity ratio will also result in the reflection of a negative amount or a higher rate than it actually
is. Thirdly, the shareholders will not be able to exercise their right and the financial statements

9ADVANCED FINANCIALS
will not be able to show the true profits which will then result in excessive dividend distribution
by the company.
Part C
It is often stated that it is the duty of the share market to reflect the correct share prices,
however this is always not the case and very often the investors have to look into the financial
reports for assistance. The decrease in the value of the shares might have a huge impact on the
share prices and though it may be balanced through an offset, the investors may not get the true
picture of the firm. Hence, the inefficiency of the capital market leads to grater disparities during
the revaluation of the assets (Jorissen et al. 2013). If the markets will be efficient, it may have
little or no impact on the wealth of the different investors.

10ADVANCED FINANCIALS
References
Ahmed, A.S., Neel, M. and Wang, D., 2013. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve
accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), pp.1344-
1372.
Ball, R., 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for
investors. Accounting and business research, 36(sup1), pp.5-27.
Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R. and Lang, M.H., 2008. International accounting standards and
accounting quality. Journal of accounting research, 46(3), pp.467-498.
Bentley, K.A., Omer, T.C. and Sharp, N.Y., 2013. Business strategy, financial reporting
irregularities, and audit effort. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), pp.780-817.
Brown, P., Preiato, J. and Tarca, A., 2014. Measuring country differences in enforcement of
accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance &
Accounting, 41(1-2), pp.1-52
Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R. and Van der Tas, L., 2013. A geographic analysis of
constituents’ formal participation in the process of international accounting standard setting: Do
we have a level playing field?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), pp.237-270.
Lequiller, F. and Blades, D., 2014. Understanding national accounts.
Leuz, C. and Wysocki, P.D., 2016. The economics of disclosure and financial reporting
regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2),
pp.525-622.

11ADVANCED FINANCIALS
Mao, Y. and Renneboog, L., 2015. Do managers manipulate earnings prior to management
buyouts?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, pp.43-61.
Nobes, C., 2014. International Classification of Financial Reporting 3e. Routledge.
Scott, W.R., 2015. Financial accounting theory (Vol. 2, No. 0, p. 0). Prentice Hall.
Teixeira, A., 2014. The International Accounting Standards Board and evidence-informed
standard-setting. Accounting in Europe, 11(1), pp.5-12.
Wang, C., 2014. Accounting standards harmonization and financial statement comparability:
Evidence from transnational information transfer. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(4),
pp.955-992.
Weil, R.L., Schipper, K. and Francis, J., 2013. Financial accounting: an introduction to
concepts, methods and uses. Cengage Learning.
Weygandt, J.J., Kimmel, P.D. and Kieso, D.E., 2015. Financial & managerial accounting. John
Wiley & Sons.
Williams, J., 2014. Financial accounting. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.