Advocacy Care Report for Disability Patients in Australia

This report provides insights on policies, guidelines, ethical principles, and strategies for the care of disabled patients in Australia. It includes the importance of advocacy for patients with visibility disorders and the need for collaboration with key stakeholders. The report also highlights the ethical principles that nurses need to follow while delivering care to disabled patients.

Advocacy Care report

INTRODUCTION
The chosen case for the report is disable patient living in Australia who actually suffered
from a visibility disorder that has made it disable in vision. Due to this disorder, the patient is not
able to make the correct choices regarding the health. That is why, advocacy is going to be
important for such disable patient because it would help in their care management and meet the
daily requirement. Further, the patients are not able to perform their work independently and that
is why, the current report will mainly focus upon the policy and guideline pertaining to visible
disable person so that they can at least meet their daily goals.
MAIN BODY
Policies and Guidelines
The policies that is to be followed towards the contribution of the extensive knowledge to
advocate on behalf of their disability patients and committees are,
 Development of position statements and policy documents and strategies with scientific
evidence for the health care issue. As per NDIS it is very important for the nurses to help
the individuals with visibility disorder patients. This is because such patient are not able
to properly create the policy statements and documents.
 Making submissions for wide range of public health inquiries (Mullan et.al., 2020, p.
517-525)
 Maintaining of ongoing high level of relationship has a wide range of key stakeholders
across the healthcare sector, medical professions state and the federal government in
Australia and national government. Development of a strong relation with viability
disorder patient is very important as helps the nurses better understand the needs.
 Proactively speaking out the media on the behalf of disability patients, physicians and
paediatricians on topical and relevant health care issues. Such guidance are considered to
be very essential for these patients with visibility disorder. It is a care that they required
for better care of the patients.
 Publicly campaign over the key issues through media and social media events and their
engagement has been related to the community and the decision makers (Sarmiento et.al.,
2022, 121-126).
The guidelines that have been made about the illness and management plan for the advocacy
for disable disability patients are,

 Attending medical appointments and complex medical tests with navigation and
translation of what is being said. It allows the disable patient to be able to gain care and
that is very important for them towards improvemens in their visibility..
 This is important to specialize in the tele conferencing meaning to attend an appointment
for providing care through smart phone for better means of providing advocacy
(Ratnayake et.al., 2022, 3616).
 It is important to ask question to disability patient for gaining the knowledge that is
important. It would need to focus on how to visibility disorder individual can negatively
influence the outcomes of their health.
 It is very essential for the collaboration of the practices that can help the advocates to ask
about the loop regarding the condition and treatments and the disability patient’s desires.
 Providing the reports that can co-ordinate with the doctors that are loop regarding the
conditions which would help in the treatments and their wishes.
 They are responsible for arranging the documentation that are needed for medical
guidelines for emergency of life situations.
 In disability health supports are available via to be used while being utilized as by the
NDIS funding.
Ethical Principles
The nurses are the advocates for the disability patient which are considered to be the find
with a balance while the delivering the disability patient care. There are four major ethical
principles that the advocacy needs to follow for being able to achieve the success that is required
for the disability patient to make their decision of such basis.
 As per the ICN code of ethic for nurses ethical guidance in relation to nurses, roles,
duties, responsibilities and behaviour has been explained. Vision disability patient has the
right to make their own decisions based on their own decisions that are based on their
beliefs and values (Heng & et.al., 2018, p. 359-378). This is also considered as the
autonomy that is the part of the visibility disorder the patient’s need for the many
conflicts that guide the cared with suggestion. The disability patient has the right to
refuse any medication, treatment, surgery or medical intervention regardless of the
benefit that may come from it. Disability patients have a right that explains no harm. This
means that non-maleficence requires the nurses to avoid any practices that can cause a

harm to the visibility disorder patient (Nolan et.al., 2021, 3) This principle is likely to be
more supported by the disability patient on how it can be chosen as the stop taking
medication that can save their lives. This is also considered to be the nurse that is able to
put a moral challenging position.
 From the ICN code of ethics it has been found that ethical values and responsibilities
affect the professional standards of nurses and health care workers (Cho et.al., 2021,
1381). Healthcare workers have a duty to be able to refrain from maltreatment and
minimization of harm. This is considered to be the promotion of the good practices
towards the health and care of the disable disability patients. Healthcare workers also
demonstrate this by providing a balance of benefits against the risks to the disability
patient. It is also considered to be the assistance that is essential for the rail to fall up with
the precautions that are key for the keeping the side rails up for fall. Nurses and carers are
needed to know and study the code of ethics within their profession. This is essential for
there to be aware of recognizing their own integrity and moral character (De La Perrelle
et.al.,2020,p. 1-10). This is essential for the basic and clear understanding of the key
ethical principles. This is essential for the profession to remain true to the disability
patient care and also towards the advocating for the disability patient rights.
Strategies
Strategies are the outlies of vision that are more inclusive to the accessibility of Australian
society in which people with disability can be cared in a way that they can fulfil their potential as
equal members of the community. The strategies in taking care of the disabled disability patients
in Australia are,
Disability patient Engagements:
This strategy is an integrated disability patient advocacy strategy that is going to serve a
road map for some PAS personnel to harness the disability patient perspective (Susanto,
2018,873). It will be generating valuable insights and demonstrate the corporate leadership with
disability communities externally. In this strategy the team of disability patient advocates and
industry disability patient engagement veterans are poised for supporting the flawless
implementation of disability patient advocacy strategies both internally and externally. This
connects the carer with information that supports and services for area of life and employment,
education, aids and equipment. This is the counselling and advocacy support services for people

with visibility disorder that is making the patient disable make them more vulnerable to violence,
abuse, neglecting and exploitation (Dillon et.al., 2020, p. 898-906). It is also for their families
and carers and those who are affected by the disability.
Medical Affairs:
It is the strategy that is more disease specific engagement with the visibility disorder in
patient’s communities for supporting them with the medial affairs and initiative for the
equipment of the team with direct and high touch access to the entire disease universe
stakeholders. The caring team is able to direct the high touch that gives an access to the
stakeholders that are involved in a particular health conditions (Dougherty et.al., 2020, p. 1-12)
This is also considered to be the targeting the disability community that is able to include the
KOLs provider, disability patient leaders and the disability patient advocacy organization to
inform and align with Med affairs agenda. This is helpful for allows the carers to take proper
care patient with visible disorder that needs proper care and support for their operations that
celebrate the recognition for the achievement for the achievement for contributing the abilities
with certain disabilities.
CONCLUSION
From the above advocacy care report it has been found that the care of the disable needs to
be done with the help of different key practices such as the policies, ethical consideration. In this
report is the analysation how the medical affairs are going to be take care of for the
understanding the practices which can contribute towards the success of health care practices and
their operations. In this the different polices and guidelines have been explained which has
provided the key insights of how the carer needs to operate the practices related to the disability
patients. It this report the ways in which the advocacy care would be planning the care of the
disability patients has been recognized in the terms of strategy.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Cho, C. K.et.al., (2021). Effects of neuromuscular blocking agents on the clinical performance of
i-gel® and surgical condition in elderly patients undergoing hand surgery: a prospective
randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 18(11). 2381.
De La Perrelle, L., et.al., (2020). Costs and economic evaluations of quality improvement
collaboratives in healthcare: a systematic review. BMC health services research. 20(1).
1-10.
Dillon, C. B. et.al., (2020). Staff awareness of suicide and self-harm risk in healthcare settings:
A mixed-methods systematic review. Journal of affective disorders. 276. 898-906.
Dougherty, L. et.al., (2020). Access to appropriate health care for non-English speaking migrant
families with a newborn/young child: a systematic scoping literature review. BMC
Health Services Research. 20(1). 1-12.
Heng, A. et.al., (2018). Transgender peoples’ experiences and perspectives about general
healthcare: A systematic review. International Journal of Transgenderism. 19(4). 359-
378.
Mullan, L. et.al., (2020). Barriers and enablers to delivering preventative and early intervention
footcare to people with diabetes: a scoping review of healthcare professionals’
perceptions. Australian journal of primary health. 25(6). 517-525.
Nolan, T. S. et.al., (2021). Cultural humility: Retraining and retooling nurses to provide
equitable cancer care. Clinical journal of oncology nursing. 25(5). 3.
Ratnayake, A. et.al., (2022). How Are Non-Medical Settlement Service Organizations
Supporting Access to Healthcare and Mental Health Services for Immigrants: A Scoping
Review. International journal of environmental research and public health. 19(6). 3616.
Sarmiento, R. J. C. et.al., (2022). Rocuronium as Neuromuscular Blockade in Tetanus Patients
With Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Case Report. The Neurohospitalist. 12(1).
121-126.
Susanto, T. (2018). Public health nurse services for maternal-child immigrant healthcare: A
literature review. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 9(3). 873.