1ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS DECISIONS FOR ESKOM Introduction Business organizations established within an economy have a significantly important role to play for that concerned economy. However, often times it is observed that a business can run in to several vital problems which greatly negate their profit margin (Maize, 2016). This paper seeks to analyze the problem which was faced by the Eskom. In this analysis, an alternative solution is also recommended which otherwise would have helped the management of Eskom to avert the crisis in hand. As such, the main purpose of this paper is to provide a different set of business decisions to solve the issue as faced by Eskom of South Africa. Problem faced by Eskom Eskom is the biggest supplier of public utility within the region of South Africa. In was founded in the year of 1923 and had the objective of supplying electricity to all the citizens of the country (Baker & Phillips, 2019). However, a major problem has been plaguing this organization for several years. The biggest problem is the inability of the firm to meet the rising demands of electricity among the concerned population. As a result of this, in their attempt to meet the growing demand, Eskom took large loans from different organizations (Sadiki & Pauw, 2017). However, now it can be observed that Eskom is unable to pay back such huge debts and is therefore, on the verge of collapse. Alternative business decisions to avert the crisis The main problem faced by Eskom is their lack to meet the rising power demands of the current population. Eskom is the largest public utility on South Africa and it is this size of the organization which poses the main challenge (Pollet, Staffell & Adamson, 2015). The lack of the
2ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS DECISIONS FOR ESKOM firm to clearly divide its responsibilities among its different smaller units has led to the high mismanagement of their reserve of electricity. One of the decisions which could have been taken is to divide the enterprise of Eskom in to several smaller distribution units (Larson, 2015). In this sense, the production sector of the firm should have been divided from the distribution sector. Furthermore, a reserve unit should have been established by the management of the firm which ensured that around fifty percent of the electric power produced by the organization is kept as a back up within the firm. This would have ensured the lesser frequency of lead shedding that is currently experienced throughout the country of South Africa. Another problem faced by the firm of Eskom is the high amount of debt loans that it owes to the other sectors of the world. This mainly arose as a result of the efforts of the management to meet the growing requirement of the population. In this attempt, they took a loan in the hopes that they would be able to pay it back with interest after receiving payment from the general public for the usage of such electricity. However, when the general public started to default on their payments, the firm consequently also started to default. An alternative business decision which could have been implemented in order to avert this crisis is that of taking lesser amount of loan (Acharya & Xu, 2017). A major bane of any business is when they are compelled to take financial help from outside sources. This means that they are liable to pay this loan back with a high rate of interest. Eskom should have instead tried to raise the money from its own share holders. This would have meant that the profits generated or the losses suffered would have been proportionally divided among such share holders who are liable to the firm itself (Miller & Yang, 2016). Furthermore, the company should have generated only that much amount of electricity that it can produce with their current level of financial
3ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS DECISIONS FOR ESKOM reserves. The moment they decided to increase their span of distribution, they were doomed to become bankrupt without the proper financial backing. Since Eskom is an enterprise which is owned by the government of South Africa, its responsibility towards the public is quite large and significant. However, an alternative business decision which would have helped the firm to avert its crisis of debt management is the establishment of other privately owned electric companies (Bernstein, 2015). While public enterprises try to uphold the welfare of the people by ensuring that the requirement of every citizen is met, this also acts as their weakness. They do not concern themselves with the generation of profits and instead, increase their base of production without thinking about the financial health of the organization. A private enterprise, on the other hand, is more concerned with the generation of profits (Miller & Yang, 2016). The main objective of any privately owned business firm is to earn a higher margin of profit. This is guaranteed by a rise in the sales volume of the company in question whereby they try to increase the quantity of goods and services which are produced by them. In this sense, the sale of so many products would consequently lead to a rise in the profit margin which is earned by the entrepreneurs of the concerned business. In this sense, if a private enterprise was established, then it would have sold its electricity at the prevailing market rate in exchange for a superior service of electricity (Miller & Yang, 2016). This in turn would have ensured the continued supply of power to the entire countryof South Africa. Conclusion In conclusion it can be observed that the different business decisions could have been implemented in an efficient manner in order to avert the crisis of load shedding and debt mismanagement that is being experienced in the context of Eskom. This is quite paramount since
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS DECISIONS FOR ESKOM the problem faced by Eskom in the recent times is adversely impacting not only the economy of South Africa but also the society of the region. Thus, there is a need on the part of the government of South Africa to find out several important business alternatives in order to improve the financial health of Eskom as well as its brand image.
5ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS DECISIONS FOR ESKOM References: Acharya, V., & Xu, Z. (2017). Financial dependence and innovation: The case of public versus private firms.Journal of Financial Economics,124(2), 223-243. Baker, L., & Phillips, J. (2019). Tensions in the transition: the politics of electricity distribution in South Africa.Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space,37(1), 177-196. Bernstein, S. (2015). Does going public affect innovation?.The Journal of Finance,70(4), 1365- 1403. Larson,A.(2015).PowerShortagesChallengeEskom,ForceLoadSheddinginSouth Africa.Power,159(3), 12-14. Maize,K.(2016).ChronicTardinessatSouthAfrica'sEskomCouldBeIts Downfall.Power,160(10), 52-55. Miller, D. J., & Yang, H. S. (2016). The dynamics of diversification: Market entry and exit by public and private firms.Strategic Management Journal,37(11), 2323-2345. Pollet, B. G., Staffell, I., & Adamson, K. A. (2015). Current energy landscape in the Republic of South Africa.International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,40(46), 16685-16701. Sadiki,M.,&Pauw,J.C.(2017).GovernmentsubventiontoEskom:policyor discretion?.Journal of Public Administration,52(4), 666-680.