Comparison and contrast between the Altinyelken research techniques to the ones in Annotated Bibliography
Verified
Added on 2023/06/05
|4
|826
|404
AI Summary
This article compares the research techniques used in Altinyelken's model and Annotated Bibliography. It highlights the differences in their focus, sampling methods, and data collection techniques.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: RESEARCH AND STUDY TECHNIQUES1 Comparison and contrast between the Altinyelken research techniques to the ones in Annotated Bibliography Name Course Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
RESEARCH AND STUDY TECHNIQUES2 COMPARISON BETWEEN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND ALTINYELKEN’S There are many research methods, but the one chosen depends on the phenomenon under review and the environment where the data is derived. A study was carried out in Uganda with regards to the implementation of the new curriculum along with its response by the teachers. The reports are marked with some contrast to the Annotated bibliographyaccording toJohnson Jr, O., & Wagner, M. (2017). Equalizers or Enablers of Inequality? A Counterfactual Analysis of Racial and Residential Test Score Gaps in Year-Round and Nine-Month Schools.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. In the Altiyelken,s model the main focus is on the curriculum as well as its impacts on the education activities. This is gross underestimation as the other aspects of the school context are not put to context in the theThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciencemajor focus is on the impact of the study durations on the performance of the students (Johnson & Wagner, (2017). It is done in order to identify the differences in performance of the year round students in relation to the nine month students. this makes the mode to have a clearer picture of the curriculum situation. In the report from the Uganda education system, there have been reports that since the new curriculum came to the picture, many improvements have been observed. Many classrooms have been created; enrollment has risen has marginally improved(Rogan & Grayson, (2003).The research also says there has been more teachers and study equipment. This shows that the Altiyelken study was mainly on the quantitative aspect.In the ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciencealthough its main nature is the quantitative data, the
RESEARCH AND STUDY TECHNIQUES3 qualitative features are put to consideration. For example, actual percentages have been used to show the education quality being offered. This is a better mode as it gauges the productivity of the schooling mode. The research methods applied in the Altinyelken report were observation as well as interviews. The school heads, teachers as well as students were part of the study where they gave the required information on the curriculum(Chaudhury et al, (2006).In the ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciencethe survey was mainly conducted on the account records from the student’s general performance. They may have missed out on the major factors leading to this results In both cases, the sampling method was used to collect information. The difference comes in the sampling technique applied. In Uganda, all the eight schools which had been selected for the implementation of the curriculum were used as grounds for the research(Chisholm and Leyendecker, (2008).This was a good move as all the information that will be collected will be an accurate representation of the general system.In theANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciencewe are told that 22,708 students were used for the research indiscriminative of their schools. In this mode, there is a probability that some group of students may be left out. The method of research, study design and the data collection technique is key to the quality of the results of the investigation. Different techniques bring different outcomes.
RESEARCH AND STUDY TECHNIQUES4 REFERENCES Johnson Jr, O., & Wagner, M. (2017). Equalizers or Enablers of Inequality? A Counterfactual Analysis of Racial and Residential Test Score Gaps in Year-Round and Nine-Month Schools. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,674(1), 240-261. Chaudhury, N., Hammer, J., Kremer, M., Muralidharan, K., Rogers, F.H., (2006). Missing in action: teacher and health worker absence in developing countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1), 91–116. Chisholm, L., Leyendecker, R., (2008). Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development 28 (2), 195–205. Rogan, J.M., Grayson, D.J., (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education 25 (10), 1171–1204