Drivers of Change for American and Japanese Culture in Automobile Industry
Verified
Added on 2023/06/04
|5
|1110
|309
AI Summary
This case study explores the drivers of change for American and Japanese culture in the automobile industry. It discusses the impact of sustainability, economy, and consumer demands on the industry and how cultural views affect their ability to change and adapt.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Business Management and strategic management Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Drivers of change for American and Japanese culture The case study indicates that automobile industry in America is more reliant towards the innovation, while sustainability remains as a mere concern. However, the launch of SUVs led to a significant growth in sales but economy in United States remains as a significant driver, as it is found that economy was stable and oil price was consistently low in 90’s compared to the previous years. The stable economy in the country increased the average disposal income which influenced and increased consumers ‘demand towards innovative products. In addition to this, it has also been identified that American culture is mostly surrounded by the developing trends and convenience (Dunning 2014). On the other side, a significant cultural characteristic supporting the development of automobile industry is the establishment of United Auto Workers Union which acquired tremendous recognition in the sector at the time of World War II by making the initiatives of developing the working conditions. The initiatives include the plans of paid pensions, health insurance for employees and their families. Such initiatives work as the motivation for employees towards their duties and responsibilities (Form 2015). Consequently, the automobile sector in America is able to produce more innovative and user-friendly vehicles. On the contrary, Japanese culture in trade is more concerned the sustainability of business and the environment. According to the case study, Toyota, Nissan and Honda are always considered as the leading manufacturer of smaller more fuel-efficient vehicles as the firms adequately comply with the principles of Clean Air Act in 1970. The manufacturers developed the engines in a way that produce limited emission which is a significant way to meet the principles of Clean Air Act (Bohnsack, Pinkse and Kolk 2014). Considering the environmental sustainability as the path to lead the business further in US market, the leading Japanese car manufacturer like Toyota was afterthe development of lower emission-based vehicles. Another significant growth driver found in Japanese culture is the identification of
2BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT consumer demands. This means that Japanese manufacturers tend to consider what their customers want and how environmental sustainability approaches can be aligned with the products that are manufactured on the basis of those demands (Gwynne 2017). The Japanese would know that any business can gain consumer trust and market position when it considers environmental sustainability. For example, in the case study, it was found that Toyota was aware of the demands related to cleaner air and greater fuel savings and thereby, Zero Emission Vehicle program influenced the car manufacturers to respond to the stricter environmental standards. Culture’s views affect their ability to change and adapt It is identified that even though Japanese culture is more supportive towards the environmental sustainability but it lacks the ability of adapting to both environmental and financial changes in the market. For example, in 2008 there was a sudden demand of trucks with the focus of gas mileage in which Honda proved its ability to produce the most efficient fuel efficient models but Nissan lack the ability to meet the newly grown demands of trucks. Wallace (2017) mentioned that businesses in all sectors must have the ability to deal with the growing or flexible demands and trends of the industry. Even though Japanese manufacturers are better at making profits from sustainability based strategies but such views of leading a business should also have a thought towards the market dynamics. On the other side, the views if American culture lacked the ability to change and adapt because consumers and the businesses influenced by the consumers are more favourable towards the convenience and demands, where economyand efficiencyremainsas thesecondary concerns(Bergek, Berggren and KITE Research Group 2014). The manufacturers are not able to meet the fuel efficiency standards as their designs of products are based on customers’ demand. It is found in the case study that despite the
3BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT technological advancements, customers are not much worried about the miles per gallon as their vehicles are larger and faster than before. Conversely, both the cultures did not consider thefactthatautoindustrycanbehighlyinfluencedbyincreasingfuelcostsand environmental regulations (Law 2017). Therefore, when designing a new car to meet customer demands, the business must consider the fact that whether their initiative is aligned to economy barriers and environmental standards. Failing to comply with the environmental regulation was the consequence of losing market share of gas vehicles. Moreover, when a business is responding to market demands, it should always consider the future trends and challenges or any other back-up to strengthen the business from its loss. In addition to this, it is worth stating that cultural views of both Japanese and American did not include the long- terms of plans such business sustainability when aligning products design with current market demands.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT References Bergek, A., Berggren, C. and KITE Research Group, 2014. The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation:A review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecological Economics,106, pp.112-123. Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J. and Kolk, A., 2014. Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 43(2), pp.284-300. Dunning, J.H., 2014. The Globalization of Business (Routledge Revivals): The Challenge of the 1990s. Routledge. Form, W.H., 2015. Blue-collar stratification: Autoworkers in four countries. Princeton University Press. Gwynne,R.,2017.Newhorizons?TheThirdWorldmotorvehicleindustryinan international framework. In Restructuring the Global Automobile Industry (pp. 61-87). Routledge Law, C.M., 2017. Restructuring the global automobile industry. Routledge. Wallace, D., 2017. Environmental policy and industrial innovation: Strategies in Europe, the USA and Japan. Routledge.