American Law and Society: 2nd Amendment Right to Carry and Bear Arms
Verified
Added on 2023/01/09
|13
|4654
|53
AI Summary
This study critically evaluates the American Law and Society 2nd amendment right to carry firearms. It examines the politics and court decisions surrounding gun control.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
American law and society second amendmentright to carry and bear arms
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3 CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................10 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12
INTRODUCTION The2nd amendmentcomply onguaranteeingright to the individuals associated with the bear arms. Thecompetent to carry firearmss within theUSis referred to as one of the key fundamental right which in turn has been specifically secured by the2nd amendments within the fundamental law of U.S.(Ruben and Blocher, 2017). The American law is based on the common law which helps in resolving various issues in a significant manner. This study will critically evaluate on theAmerican Law and Society2nd amendment competent to carry firearmss. This study will evaluate various set of articles which mainly helps in critically examining the key viewpoints associated with thePolitics Changed the Reading of the2nd amendmentand the Court Failed on Gun Control. Moreover, this study also mainly examines the key excerpts from the District of Columbia v. Heller 2008 to attain wider set of knowledge and understanding. MAIN BODY Thecompetent to carry firearmsis considered to be as tradition which tends to have key significant root within the society. As per the Thomas Jefferson, no free man must bebarroom from the usage of the arms. In order to prevent the citizens or individuals of theUSwho peace from guardianship their set of arms. Thecompetent to carry firearmsis significantly protected by the2ndamendmentwithintheUSconstitution(O'Scannlain,2019).However,the2nd amendmentis useful in assurance the right of the individual people in order to keep and bear the arms. The key significant purpose which is useful in stating the claims which has been claimed by the2nd amendmentwith the key significant purpose in order to preserve the state militia.The 2nd amendmentfocuses on guaranteeing the right of the individuals associated with the bear arms. Moreover, thecompetent to carry firearmstends to give right to the individuals which is useful in possessing the arms for own set of defence.Thecompetent to carry firearmss within the USis referred to as one of the key fundamental right which in turn has been specifically secured by the2nd amendments within the constitution of US. Background of the2nd amendment The American law within theUSmainly comprise of many levels associated with the uncodified and codified forms within the law. The constitution of the America mainly focuses on effectively setting the boundaries linked with the federal law. Thecompetent to carry firearms
has been effectively passed by the Congress on 25thSeptember, 1789. The2nd amendmenthas been ratified on the 15thDecember, 1791. A well eshtablished within the Militia, being considered compulsory for security within the free states (Põiklik, 2016). The regulation tends to effectively state that, the right of person must not be edge. The2nd amendmentmainly focuses on significantly protecting the private right of the individual which is useful to keepand fire arms.The2nd amendmentis significant because it provides well eshtablished Militia, which has been considered necessary within the safety of the free state. The2nd amendmentmainly focuses on providing the citizens of theUSwith the right to bear arms. The2nd amendment which has been proposed by the James Madison after the constitution has been ratified officially in order to provide the wide set of powers to the state militia. However, the state militia are considered to be as a National guard. It is classified between the Federalists and the non- federalists (Cornell, and Cornell, 2018). However, thefederalist are considered to be as those who tends to significantly support the constitution. On the contrary, anti- federalists are those who supports the states who tends to have more power. The key amendments has been made to give the citizens of theUSkey opportunity to significantly fight back within the tyrannical federal government. After the ratification of the amendment II, the Americans have been arguing over the interpretation and meaning attached with the2nd amendment. The Amendment II gives right to the state in maintaining and training the formal militia units. This is highly significant in providing the protection against the oppressive federal government. A well eshtablished militia helps in bearing the arms in order to effectively carry gun in legal and reliable manner. The federal government does not have the right to abolish state militias. Those who tends to have a contradictory viewpoints stated that, the citizen must have the key relevant right to effectively own a gun. As per the National rifle association, the amendment II must give all the citizens of the USA and not just key members of the militia in order to give significant right to effectively own a gun. Thecompetent to carry firearmshas been debated regularly within the court of public opinion. The opinion of the Supreme court tends to matter (Halbrook, 2020). The Amendment II is highly based on the right to keep and also bear the arms within the English common law. The 2nd amendmenthas been influenced by the English bill of right in 1689. Moreover, Sir William Blackstone focuses on describing the right as the auxiliary right which mainly focuses on supporting the natural rights associated with the self-defence and also key resistance to the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
oppression (Pollard,2019). This amendment states that, it is the civic duty of the individual person to significantly act within the concert in defence. The court failed on Gun Control. The case of John Paul Stevens on the “the court failed on Gun Control” stated about the decision of Supreme court that the individual has the right to possess and carry firearms under the constitution and this is not the incorrect decision. This is majorly because of the reason that all the individual has right to protect themselves and for this the most essential thing is to carry the arms and other related things with the person. This was undoubtedly the wrong decision because of the reason that the this can even result in many dangerous things like the people can use the weapons for their personal problems also and this might hamper the working of their life. As per the2nd amendmentit is stated that a well eshtablished military is necessary for the safety and security of the people and because of this reason there is no need of providing the right to carry the arms and other weapons with them. This was due to the fact that if there was any situation where the arms were required then in that case the police or the militants were available. Thus, it was not required by the common people or the civilians to carry the arms and other weapons with them. The background of the2nd amendmentit was seen that this was a better amendment to not allow the civilians to carry the arms with them as it can be dangerous. When the Justice John Paul Stevens joined the supreme court then at that time both state and federal judges accepted the decision under the case ofUSv. Miller to establish the2nd amendmentwherein protection of the right to bear the arms by only the militia and the weapons which were used by the military only. There was a controversy relating to the2nd amendmentwhere Heller raised objection to the use of the firearm regulations by the civil people. This was basically because of the reason that first two federal laws directly restricted the civilians to use the arms and other related products of safety. After all the discussion and the debates and argument over this decision of firearm it was unanimously concluded that the2nd amendmentdoes not apply to possess the arm with them (The supreme court’s worst decision of my tenure, 2019). Thus, the2nd amendmentensures and guarantees that no person or the civilian is allowed or is having the right to keep and carry and bear a firearm which do not have any relationship with the eshtablished military or is not having any of the permission then the person is not allowed to keep the weapons or firearms with them.
In the end it can be said that it was the right decision to not change the2nd amendment as if this would have changed then the civilians will be allowed to keep the arms with them and this can be very risky and harmful for the people. This was due to the reason that this can be very dangerous as these firearms can be used in wrong or for some other purpose as well. As per the John Paul Stevens case, the decision of the court fails to evaluate the any new set of evidence which supports the view of the2nd amendmentand has been limiting the power of the congress in order to effectively regulate the civilian use of the weapon (Lerner, 2020). Within the dissenting opinion, the John Paul Stevens has clearly stated that the judgement which has been strained and also unpersuasive reading. Politics has changed the reading of the 2nd amendment The key prospect associated with the gun control legislation within the congress tends to appear to be remote. The National rifle association (NRA) and its alliancewithin the lobby tends to effectively maintain a firm grip upon the Republican party. Effective measures has been taken in order to curb gun violence (Epstein and Konig, 2019). The key significant powers which are associated with the National rifle association are considered to be beyond the control of the executive and legislative branches. The2nd amendmenttends to put high degree of emphasis and states clear set of meaning that, it is awell regulated within the Militia, being considered necessary for the security within the free states. The regulation tends to effectively state that, the right of the people must not be infringed. The Supreme court states the2nd amendmentdo not confer with the individual right. In the year 19thCentury, the National rifle association undertook the key extensive effort in order to change the public and key understanding related with the2nd amendment. Passing and embracing the gun sight legislation within the states which mainly fosters legal culture in order to evaluate thecompetent to carry firearms. Moreover, the District of the Columbia v. Heller tends to effectively develop understanding on the2nd amendment (Politics Changed the Reading of the2nd amendment—and Can Change It Again,2019). As per the Chief Justice Warren E. Burger establish the fact that, the2nd amendmenteffectively confers with the right of the individual in order to bear arms as a fraud within the American public. Despite mass shooting within the Dayton and the El Pas, the future of the gun control tends to look grim. The Amendment II within theUSmainly focuses on protecting the right of the individual person in order to effectively keep and bear arms (Timpson, 2018). A well regulated Militia is considered to be highly crucial because it is significant for the individuals of
theUSto keep bear arms. The2nd amendmentis classified into two parts where a prefatory clause states that, a well regulated militia is considered to be necessary to the security within the free state. On the contrary, an operative clause is referred to state that, it is the right of the individual to keep and effectively bear the arms must not be infringed. The key purpose of the Amendment II is to effectively maintain organized and formal militia units to improve the protection of the fire arms.The2nd amendmenthas been significantly invoked by both the sides within the contemporary debate of the gun (Zuidema, 2018). Each side of the law mainly focuses on only one part of the amendment. Here one side is thatprefatory clause and the other one is an operative clause. TheNRAand various other gun right groups mainly focuses on affirming with thecompetent to carry firearms. This right in turn must not be infringed. District of the Columbia v. Heller As per the District of the Columbia v. Heller (2008), the supreme court in turn has invalidated the federal law which tends to forbade all the civilians in order topossess arm guns within the nation's capital. As per the 5-4 majority rule, the language and the key background which has been linked with the2nd amendment. It is highly significant in protecting the private right of the individual in order to own weapons or arms for the defence of their own. This does not own the right within the state in order to maintain a militia. The district of the Columbia tends to usually prohibit the possession of the arm guns (Winkler, 2018). However, it is considered to be as a crime in order to carry out the unregistered firearm. The registration of the arm gun is prohibited. The individual person cannot carry an arm gun without the licence. However, the chief of the police tends to issue licence for the period of 1 year. The district of the Columbia law have requested residents to keep the lawfully owned and registered fire arms which has been unloaded and are also bound to dissemble the trigger lock of the gun.Dick Heller is a D.C. Police officer where they have been authorized to carry a arm gun at the time of duty within the Federal judicial Center. He has a registered gun and also had a certificate for the arm gun which the police offer wishes to keep at residential area. However, the district of the Columbia has refused for the same. Dick Heller has filed a lawsuit within the Federal district court. On the grounds of the2nd amendment, the district of Columbia seeks to enjoy the city in order to enforce the bar on the key registration associated with the arm gun (OPINION OF THE COURTDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER554 U. S. 570 (2008),2020). The district court of Columbia has banned all the arm guns naturally and also states that, the other sort of fire arms
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
within the home must be dissembled or has been bound by a trigger lock at all the times. Arm guns are considered to be as one of the most popular weapon which has been chosen by the Americans for the purpose of self- defence at their home. The core law purpose of the self- defence is that, the fire arms must be rendered inoperable. The court has also significantly stated that, the2nd amendments tends to have no set of specific limitation which tends to prohibit on the possession of the fire arm guns by the mentally ill and felons. The2nd amendments tend to have no set of specific prohibition associated with the carrying of dangerous weapons on the government buildings or school premises (Epstein and Konig, 2019). The court of Columbia has not significantly developed or effectively established the prospective standards which is useful in regulating the actions associated with the future guns. The district of Columbia is considered to be as a federal enclave. The registration of the arm gun is prohibited. The2nd amendmentis highly significant because it is useful in protecting the right of an individual person to effectively possess a fire arm gun which has been unconnected with the service within the Militia. The district of Columbia vs Heller U.S. 2008 is referred to as the landmark decision of the supreme court within theUS(Cornell, and Cornell, 2018). The2nd amendmentis significant in protecting the right of an individual to keep and bear arm which are unconnected with the service within Militia. As per the District of the Columbia the handgun ban andrequirements which are lawfully linked with the shotguns and rifles has to be kept disassembled and unloaded by the trigger lock. The district of Columbia status associated with the federal enclave decision has not effectively addressed the question associated with the due process clause on the 14th amendment against the states. It is considered to be as one of the key significant and first supreme court case which is useful in exploring the meaning within the2nd amendment. The district of Columbia vs Heller U.S. 2008 has been originated within the suit and file within the U.S district court. The district's firearm control regulation act, 1975 ban the registration of the handguns, deadly or dangerous weapon, prohibited to carry out unlicensed handgun. However, the firearms and any another weapon in turn has been locked and also disassembled in order to effectively prevent firing. The district court of the Columbia has given the motion to the government in order to dismiss. In a 5- 4 ruling which has been issued on 26thJune. The Supreme court has also affirmed the appellate court's ruling (OPINION OF THE COURTDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER554 U. S. 570 (2008),2020). The amendment focuses on effectively
protecting a collective right within the states in order to maintain militia and is prominent for the individual incompetent to carry firearmss associated with the service in Militia. The amendment associated with the prefatory clause is significant in announcing the purpose but it does not expand or significantly limit the operative clause of the statement within the second assessment. There are wide set of million of gun owners within theUSfear because of the peaceful ownership and is significant for the use of fire arms which in turn has to be carried away in case the constitutional protection has been provided. Elected representatives tends to pass high degree of stringent legislations which is useful in addressing and banning of the gun ownership and use (Ruben and Blocher, 2017). Both the clause of the statements related with the2nd amendments tends to have high degree of legitimate points. There seems to be high degree of need to significantly make politically sustainable progress and also make wide set of rapid changes within the US. This way it is useful in interacting with the wide set of disturbing problems. The right to bear arm is mainly linked with the white people within US. As per the current Black Lives matter movement, the black man tends to carry a concealed set of weapon illegally in order to protect themselves and is useful at the time of defence. The founding generation within the2nd amendmenthas been enacting racially discriminatory gun laws. The American lawmakers tends to prohibit the slaves and also often free blacks in order to possess weapons of any kind (Cornell, and Cornell, 2018). The state like Virginia allows blacks to have guns. But, prior permission from the local officials has to be taken. The southern states within theAmericahasalsobarredthefreedomin order to significantly possess the arm guns to protect themselves. There are racists who in turn are known as the group Ku Klux Klan to terrorize the blacks and also take away the guns. Discrimination tends to continue even if they are highly inclined towards making the 14th amendments. This eventually influenceimportance of the right to carry the arms and other weapons. There are influx of immigrants from distinct part of the Europe are likely to be inclined towards committing crime and also carry out hidden set of weapons. It is crucial for the cities and states to enact the American laws in order to restrict the concealed carry. These American laws are complying with the National rifle association. The NRA is significant in stating broad discretion associated with the local authorities which is useful in deciding who has sufficient level of good reason to carry gun in the public area (Winkler, 2018). Malcolm X and the Black
Panthers has took up arms and has also significantly articulated a novel view of the Amendment II. It not only tends to give the optimum degree of right to keep the gun at home and it also significantly helps in protecting the right on the individual to have gun in the public. Malcolm X and the Black Panthers were considered to be as an effective measure which is useful in effectively passing new gun regulations which has been effectively intended to disarm the black radicals. The Heller tends to impose some set of clarity which is significant in inheriting the right to own guns in a lawful manner. Heller has also effectively applied the standards to effectively overturn the ban. This is useful in privately holding the handguns and has been effectively enacted within the district of the Columbia. The congress has also tried to ban the assault type weapon in the year 1994. However, the2nd amendmentcannot be reformed because of wide set of political factors which has taken place within the US. There are various set of societal and political changes which makes it difficult for the law amender and government to make necessary changes within the2nd amendment. The government taking necessary measures is useful in making rapid and also politically sustainable progress within theUSto evaluate the various set of disturbing and intractable problems. The national rifle association tends to mainly focus on effectively allying with the various groups which helps in maintaining the gun lobby in order to effectively maintain the firm grip. Hence, the2nd amendmentof the constitution within U.S. Is well regulated within the militia and has been used necessarily for securing the free state. The right of theUSmust not be infringed because it is significant tocarry the firearms. The key historical relationshiplinked with the English bill of the right and the amendment II which tends to codify the existing rights and tends to do not create a new one which has been significantly acknowledgedwith the US supreme court. The right associated with the whole people who are young and old, women or men, boys or girls& not includes the militiain order to significantlyretain &alsocarry the firearms. Such rights must not be infringed and people can use it in their defence. However, people who have a sickness or mental illness must not be given authority to use fire guns. CONCLUSION From the above conducted study it has been summarized that, the2nd amendmentis useful inassuring the rightof the person in order tocarrythe arms. The National rifle association and various other gun right groups mainly focuses on affirming with thecompetent to carry firearms. This right in turn must not be infringed. The American law within theUSis mainly
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
based on the common law to carry out all the sets of activities. As per the John Paul Stevens case,sentence provided by the courtfails to evaluate the any new set of evidence which supports the view of the2nd amendment.The2nd amendmenthas two side of the law which mainly includesclause which are prefatory and operative clause. As per the District of the Columbia v. Heller (2008), it is considered to be as a crime in order to carry out the unregistered firearm. The firearms and any another weapon in turn has been locked and also disassembled in order to effectively prevent firing. As per the current Black Lives matter movement, the black man carries weapons.
REFERENCES Books and Journals Cornell, S. and Cornell, E., 2018. The2nd amendmentand firearms regulation: A venerable tradition regulating liberty while securing public safety. Epstein, L. and Konig, D.T., 2019. The strange story of the2nd amendmentin the federal courts, and why it matters.Wash. UJL & Pol'y,60, p.147. Halbrook, S.P., 2020. The Right to Bear Arms: For Me, but Not for Thee.Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y,43, p.331. Lerner, R.L., 2020. The2nd amendmentand the Spirit of the People.Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y,43, p.319. O'Scannlain, D.F., 2019. Glorious Revolution to American Revolution: The English Origin of thecompetent to carry firearmss.Notre Dame L. Rev.,95, p.397. Põiklik, P., 2016. People’scompetent to carry firearmss: Arguments on the meaning of the2nd amendmentto theUSConstitution in District of Columbia v. Heller.Journal of Language and Politics,15(2), pp.173-192. Pollard, J.S., 2019.“To Keep and Bear Arms": Heller and the public understanding of arms rights(Doctoral dissertation). Ruben, E. and Blocher, J., 2017. From Theory to Doctrine: An Empirical Analysis of the competent to carry firearmss After Heller.Duke LJ,67, p.1433. Timpson, C.M., 2018.2nd amendmentChallenges: What Level of Constitutional Scrutiny Applies?. Winkler, A., 2018. Is the2nd amendmentBecoming Irrelevant.Ind. LJ,93, p.253. Zick, T., 2018. The2nd amendmentas a Fundamental Right.Hastings Const. LQ,46, p.621. Zuidema, S., 2018. An Illusory Right: Revisiting Illinois'competent to carry firearmss.U. Ill. L. Rev. Online, p.228. Online OPINION OF THE COURTDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER554 U. S. 570 (2008). 2020. [Online].Availablethrough: <https://msflo986656.app.box.com/s/7wp4lo6xdp5lyx06mvtwxaoxhmiy5i6q/file/ 611331868130>
Politics Changed the Reading of the2nd amendment—and Can Change It Again. 2019. [Online]. Available through: <https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/politics- changed-the-reading-of-the-second-amendmentand-can-change-it-again> Thesupremecourt’sworstdecisionofmytenure.2019.[Online].Availablethrough: <https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/john-paul-stevens-court-failed-gun- control/587272/>