Amin Sthapit Murder Trial Accused Roy Tabalbag 'Provoked' Case
Verified
Added on  2021/06/17
|7
|1747
|49
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND MATHS, Charles Sturt University Amin Sthapit murder trial: accused Roy Tabalbag 'provoked' into killing girlfriend Geecy Rebucas's lover Assignment 3: Applying Ethical Theory Your Name Student Number Word Count:-1250
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Title of news/case study Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................2 Utilitarianism theory..................................................................................................................2 Deontology Theory....................................................................................................................3 Virtue theory..............................................................................................................................4 Contract theory...........................................................................................................................4 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................5 References..................................................................................................................................6 Your Name
Title of news/case study Introduction With the changes in time, there are several theories which emphasis upon the actions of the person in the particular situation. In the given case, it is found that the incident of killing took place when the accused found her girlfriendgettingindulged with her lover making intimation. The main reason of killing that girl was based on the fact that she found her girlfriend with Chef her lover Amin Sthapit. This report has reflected the use or implication of the different theories such as Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue and Contract theories. These theories have shown the proper judgement and various other factors which may impact the acts committed by the accused (Fryer, 2016). Utilitarianism theory In this theory, the pleasure of the particular felling and the actions entered by the person has been taken into consideration. It is evaluated that the Utilitarianism theory reflects the actions and outcomes taken by the accused out of the pleasure of the feeling.The Utility is used to divulge the well-being of the sentient entities which depicts the actions undertaken under the particular situation. The defencing way to save the accused could be based on the form of the results which was found on the basis of the pleasure undertaken in the particular situation. The standards and facts which describes new version of the consequentialism and the facts has been divulged the right and wrong actions under the particular circumstance (Lucas, & Galinsky, (2015). It is considered that combination of the pleasure comes from the form of the results which might be deviated from the current mind set of the accused. In the given case, Utilitarianism theory has been used to identify whether the act of the accused was right or wrong. However, in the given case, it is considered that her girlfriend Geecy Rebucas was indulged in doing intimation with her lover Amin Sthapit. After seeing that scene, accused got disappointed, felt sorrow and had pain. It resulted to the loss of his mental condition and he murdered her for the same. The Utilitarianism theory divulges that the act of the accused was right as per the general point of view. The act of her girlfriend was not right but killing her for the same was also not right at all. Nonetheless, his aggression killed her girlfriend and at the time of that act accused was not in her right mental situation.The instant action was the result of the feeling pleasure of aggression (Lucas, & Galinsky, 2015). Your Name
Title of news/case study The Roy Abanales Tabalbag was indulged in guilty of manslaughter and murdered her girlfriend. The defence was made in terms of Utilitarianism theory which reflects the act of pleasure coming out from the particular situation. After seeing her girlfriend in her situation, he lost his control and murdered her at spot. The Utilitarianism theory cannot save the act committed by him as the act was neither legal nor ethical in general terms. Nonetheless, the mental condition might be considered to prepare the proper defence. This Utilitarianism theory emphasises upon the feeling, pleasure of work, aggression and the circumstance in which the act was committed (Winkler, and Duminy, 2016). Deontology Theory The deontology theory focuses on the morality of the action and act undertaken by the accused. This theory is used to judge the morality of the action in the specified circumstance in that accused murdered his girlfriend (Bostyn, Roets, & Van Hiel, 2016). This deontology theory emphasises upon the obligation, duty and ethics which required to be undertaken to judge the particular action and moral obligation of the concerned persons (Albee, 2014). There are several ethical, moral and duties which should be taken care by the accused in his act. However, at that time, he was not in his right mental condition due to negative situation and wrongdoing of his girlfriend.The morality of the action is based on the particular circumstance.The religious laws set of rules, regulation, social values, and belief. In the given case, accused murdered her girlfriend as he could not see her intimating with others. The crime of murder was not unethical as per the deontology theory. The deontology theory shows that each and every person should act on the basis of proper mind control and should not take hustle free decision. As per the deontology theory, the act of the accused was not ethical and the act was based on several other factors (Bell, Dyck, & Neubert, 2017). The defence of Tabalabag was related to loss of mental condition.The deontology theory emphasises upon the morality of the acts which was committed by accused. He murdered her girlfriend which was not good and his act was not at all moral (Treviqo, & Tilly, 2015). Your Name
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Title of news/case study Virtue theory The virtue theory emphasises upon the intents, characteristics and benefits of the person. Each and every person has their own virtue such as inherent characteristics, intents of mind, inner strength and developed core aspects. The virtue theory emphasises upon the quality of persona and his own intents which makes him more viable to the particular situation. In this given case, act of the accused to murder his girlfriend was neither ethical nor moral. It was the acts of his aggression which spontaneously resulted to killing his girlfriend. It is found that if a person could use his virtue to control his anger and happiness then he could easily avoid the possible issues and problems (Winkler, & Duminy, 2016).The accused did not have the virtue of self-control which resulted to the negative action. He had to suffer so many issues and problems due to his uncontrolled act of killing his girlfriend. It could be inferred that the virtue theory focuses on the intents and positive factors of the person and their uses in the particular situation (Drake, 2016). Contract theory The contracts theory has several rules and regulation to maintain the peace of harmony int eh work process system. In the given case, it is observed that each and every person should be collaboratively working for each other benefits and obliged to behave morally if there are explicit rules. These rules are equal for everyone and followed on equal basis. In the case, it has been considered that, accuses killed her girlfriend on the basis of her wrong act, which is illegal in the society. It is inferred that killing could have been morally permissible only when the society does not have implicit and explicit rules, In this case, the act is neither right nor ethical, and would be considered as breach of contract theory due to the wrong doing of both parties (Shestack, 2017). Your Name
Title of news/case study Conclusion This report has divulged the imperial study on the case given in which accused person kills his girlfriend Geecy Rebucas. However, he murdered her girlfriend because he saw her Chef her lover Amin Sthapit getting indulged in intimation. These different theories given in this report has shown the different results and judgements which could be taken for evaluating his situation. The Utilitarianism theory focuses on analysing the situation of accused and his acts whichcomeoutofthepleasure.Thevirtuetheoryfocusesonthepain,sorrow, disappointment and sadness which he had to face at the time when he saw her with her lover making intimation scene. Your Name
Title of news/case study References Albee, E., 2014.A history of English utilitarianism(Vol. 1). Routledge. Bell, G. G., Dyck, B., & Neubert, M. J. (2017). ETHICAL LEADERSHIP, VIRTUE THEORY, AND GENERIC STRATEGIES.Radical Thoughts on Ethical Leadership, 113. Bostyn, D. H., Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2016). Right-wing attitudes and moral cognition: Are Right-WingAuthoritarianismandSocialDominanceOrientationrelatedtoutilitarian judgment?.Personality and Individual Differences,96, 164-171 Drake, N., (2016). A Humean Constructivist Reading of JS Mill's Utilitarian Theory.Utilitas,28(2), pp.189-214. Fryer, M. (2016). A role for ethics theory in speculative business ethics teaching.Journal of business ethics,138(1), 79-90. Lucas, B. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Is utilitarianism risky? How the same antecedents and mechanismproducebothutilitarianandriskychoices.Perspectivesonpsychological science,10(4), 541-548. Shestack, J. J. (2017). The philosophic foundations of human rights. InHuman Rights(pp. 3-36). Routledge. Treviqo, A.J. & Tilly, C., (2015).George C. Homans: History, theory, and method. Routledge. Winkler, T. and Duminy, J., 2016. Planning to change the world? Questioning the normative ethics of planning theories.Planning Theory,15(2), pp.111-129. Winkler, T., & Duminy, J. (2016). Planning to change the world? Questioning the normative ethics of planning theories.Planning Theory,15(2), 111-129. Your Name