Analysis of Judicial Review Power of Supreme Court and its Impact

This essay provides an analysis of the judicial review power of the Supreme Court, emphasizing its crucial role in the US legal system. The essay begins by referencing Article III of the Constitution, which establishes the Supreme Court and grants Congress the authority to regulate it. It then defines judicial review as the court's power to examine laws, rules, and agreements that contradict existing laws, enabling the court to review decisions made by the legislative and executive branches. The essay highlights the significance of judicial review, including its function in safeguarding individuals from unjust laws, protecting fundamental rights, maintaining democratic principles, and upholding checks and balances among the three branches of government. The essay also mentions landmark cases such as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969), which underscores the court's influence on society and its decisions' impact on various groups, including students. The conclusion stresses that without judicial review, the democratic structure of the country would be undermined, leading to confusion and uncertainty in the legal framework.

RUNNING HEAD: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW POWER OF SUPREME COURT
Title: Analysis of Judicial Review Power of Supreme Court
Name of Student:
Name of University:
Author Note:

1ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW POWER OF SUPREME COURT
Article III of the Constitution develops the administration legitimate official. Article III, Section
I communicates that "The lawful Power of the United States, will be vested in one superior
Court, and in such fair Courts as the Congress may occasionally select and develop” (Rhodes, A.
M., and Segre, L. S. (2013). In spite of the fact that the Constitution structures the Supreme
Court, it awards Congress to the way of dealing with it. Congress at first rehearsed this power in
the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act made a Supreme Court with six judges. It in like manner
settled the lower government court system. In any case, the most basic movement that falls under
the ward of Supreme Court is the legal executive audit. This alludes to the intensity of the court
to inspect and examine the guidelines, rules and bargains negating the laws that are now existing
(Tushnet, M. 2017). This empowers the court to audit and analyze choices made by the
lawmaking body and officials.
Despite the fact that not referenced in the constitution unequivocally, this has now become the
most basic staff of the Supreme Court in light of the accompanying reasons:
1. Aides in shielding the individuals from submitting to unjustifiable and treacherous laws.
2. Secures the major right of ordinary citizens.
3. The confidence in majority rule government is kept alive.

2ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW POWER OF SUPREME COURT
4. keeps up the balanced governance between the three mainstays of government-in particular,
legal executive, assembly and administrators.
The legal audit can express the lawful proviso and activities of neighborhood, state and
national government.
It is normal that the court will act unbiasedly and will not be impacted by outside power. The
court in the area states that it is primarily and most imperatively, the ultimate decider, after every
single other alternative have run out for those scanning for value. Second, as a result of its ability
of lawful overview, it expect a major work which will ensure that every wheel of government
sees the purposes of control of its own ability. It also guarantees social balance and opportunities
by lowering down laws that negligect the Constitution. Moreover, it sets legitimate purposes of
constrainment on vote-based government as it ensures that the standard larger parts is not able to
pass laws that harm just as endeavor hated minorities. For the most part, the main idea of this
review system is ensuring the changing points of view on a lion's offer do not erode the
significant characteristics fundamental to all Americans, i.e., the privilege to talk unreservedly of
talk, chance of religion, and reasonable treatment of law.
The decisions made by the court critically influence society all over the place, not just on
lawful guides. The decisions made by the Court significantly influence auxiliary school
understudies. Unbelievably, a couple of achievement cases that the court has picked, have
included understudies, e.g., Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969) held that
understudies should not be pushed back for wearing dim manacle to class to battle the Vietnam
War. In the Tinker case, the Court verdict was that, understudies do not shed their benefits at the
school building passage.

3ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW POWER OF SUPREME COURT
From the above exchange, it gets clear that the nonappearance of legal audit by the Supreme
Court will in the long run lead in disintegrating of the vote based set up of the country. The total
intensity of the administrators to execute laws, without considering the current ones will make
disarrays and vulnerability in framework.

4ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW POWER OF SUPREME COURT
References:
Rhodes, A. M., & Segre, L. S. (2013). Perinatal depression: a review of US legislation and law.
Archives of women's mental health, 16(4), 259-270.
Tushnet, M. (2017). New forms of judicial review and the persistence of rights-and democracy-
based worries. In Bills of Rights (pp. 265-290). Routledge.