Leadership Profile Report for Andy Penn at Telstra
Verified
Added on  2023/06/04
|9
|3200
|228
AI Summary
This report evaluates the leadership of Andy Penn, CEO of Telstra, using various theories and concepts. It highlights his strengths and weaknesses as a leader and suggests areas of improvement.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Assessment Leadership Profile Report
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................3 Main Body..................................................................................................................................3 Evaluation 1: Trait Approach-...............................................................................................3 Evaluation 2: Contingency Approach....................................................................................4 Evaluation 3: Perception and personality...............................................................................4 Evaluation 4: Leader Ethics...................................................................................................5 Evaluation 5: Motivation........................................................................................................6 Evaluation 6: Power and social influence..............................................................................6 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................8 References..................................................................................................................................9
Introduction Andy Penn is working at the position of Chief executive officer in Telstra which is established in Australia. He has been selected for this designation in the year 2015 by the administrative team and members of board. The objective of Penn is making the Telstra advanced in the digital industry and telecommunication business. But on the other side he is not fulfilling some of his moral obligation as a leader towards the staff and employed of the institution(Fitzsimmons, and Callan, 2020). It is the reason due to which this business firm is not able to maintain their employees longer for with the operational activities of the company. This given report is about the leadership of Penn which will be evaluated with the help of some known theories and concept.It will also explain the necessity of the good leadership tactics in an organisation and for the employees. The poor conduct of a leader is directly coordinated with the working of the staff in any organisation. Main Body Evaluation 1: Trait Approach- This theory of leadership is about the features and attributes of a leader, according to it the leaders are not born and no one can teach the quality of the leadership.It is something with which one is born, he himself has the capability that help in governing or guiding the people. But in case on Andy Penn, it is not same. He was working as lower designation in the Telstra before becoming the CEO of the organisation. So, it does not show his potential that he might be a good leader for the employees it just like a promotion which he has get because of the good working(Bhattacharyya, and Jha, 2018). Here, Penn must have that skills which assist him in making the good employee of the firm, but he lags in making the people aware about the accomplishment of task in order to attain the organisational goal of Telstra. With the necessary study of the trait theory which basically emphasis on the characteristics of the leader in the firm. There are some good qualities of Penn such as his commitment regarding the construction of Telstra as most progressive in utilising the digital aspects. Not only this he is also confident and self-aware which makes him more devoted towards the working. Penn is focusing on presenting the new policies in the company, which shows that he is quite open in the risk-taking activities. Not only this, he must have some good plans that help Telstra in overcoming the adverse situation. By rating them on the scale of 1-10 of trait approach then he lies on the 7thposition, because of his abilities which are aligning with the basic traits of a leader in an organisation. This theory is depicting the Penn as an effective spearhead which
has all the key factors with which he is showing that he is a good leader for Telstra (Gibbs,Press,and Wong, 2019). Evaluation 2: Contingency Approach This theory of helps in identifying the relation among the leadership style which used by a leader is parallel with the prevailing situation in an organisation. This approach of leadership indicates the diversified condition of the workplace that may present the style of the leader effective and ineffective. To explore a good leader with the help of this approach, one must have the efficiency to look over the situation in different manner as per the requirements and needs of the circumstances. For instance, Penn has to face some new and challenging task at Telstra, so as per this theory his mindfulness in such situation specifies his all and all ability to govern the organisation and the employees who are working there. It has been observed that employees who are working in the company does not have productive and friendly relation among each other(Latta,2020). Moreover, there is also avoidance in providing the better environment of functioning for the workers, this may increase the inefficiency among the employees. Penn is following the strict work structure in the telecommunication institution, which may increase the burden on the employees. Continuous andrigidworkschedulemayresultinunproductiveandlesscreativestaffwhich automatically affects the performance of Telstra. Moreover, the policies that are formulate with the objective of guiding and informing the employees is quite restricted which is not allowing the employees to involve the decisions taking business meetings. The employees are not getting enough encouragement and support from Penn, which is not good as this might result in development of conflicts at the work place. By acknowledging the leadership of Andy Penn with the contingency approach then he gets the rank of 4 because of the less responsible behaviour for the employees which is building the poor work culture in Telstra (Prentice, 2022). Evaluation 3: Perception and personality The perception of a leader refers to the observation and awareness while dealing with the different employees and staff in the institution. This concept is not limited to the workforce of the business but it also ranges to the external environment and stimulating factors for the management. Talking about Penn, then he is very much strong and opinionated while dealing any contrary condition, he presents his overall judgement and try to build the good and constructive planning for Telstra institution. But keeping everything aside, here one thing which is not presentable among him is that, he is not collaborative and coordinative
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
with employees(Evans, Sanner, and Chiu, 2021). He only focuses on the accomplishment of the task and work, which makes him less understanding for the employees. Penn should know about the fact that showing care for the workers helps in building the good and constructive connection between the higher authority and subordinates of Telstra. After becoming chief executive officer, Penn has gone to various interviews and events where he has spoken on his strategy and planning for the future development of Telstra. This represented him as the good communicator and narrator for the situation. In some situation, he has been accountable for the errors which may occur in the institution. But he was found guilty in money laundering case that makes his appearance bad in front of the customers who are associated with the business. In addition to this it could be difficult for the employees as well to work under the leadership of such person who have been done such things in past(Day, and Liu, 2018). This may affect the working of Telstra as well, but it is very questionable that why the committee has selected him as the CEO of the telecommunication business. Due to this Penn ranks to the spot of 2, this is because such dishonours could reduce the effectiveness of leader in the business firm. Evaluation 4: Leader Ethics Ethical behaviour of Penn in Telstra is not very impressive, he is always stress on finishing the task before the given deadline. The leader of the company should know that if he will give proper acknowledgement and importance to the employees who are working for him, then he will also get that respect and loyalty as the reward. But Penn does not provide such health surrounding of working to the employees(Kozachuk, and Conley, 2021). He must know the necessity of inclusiveness among the meetings which is concerned with the suggestion and ideas of the subordinates. The poor ethic of Penn keeps him on the rank of 5, this is showing his disorganization for the workforce of Telstra. Such tactics of the business may give rise to the disinterest of the employees in the work structure of the company. This also shows the uninformed behaviour of the leader in the firm. The leader of the business is that part which embodies the ethics of the employees also. By showing such unethical actions, Penn is responsible for the poor conduct of the employees. This type leadership ability also impacts the consumer base of the business. Furthermore, Penn should provide the time-to-time employees meeting that will help in gathering the reviews and feedbacks of the employees about the behavioural aspects of himself (Tarker, 2019). With the constant exploitationofemployeesintheformofbadconduct,makesthemfrustratedand disappointed with the administration of Telstra. In consequence of this, they will deal with
the customers in the same way which reduce the competitiveness of the business firm from their rivals. This will adversely affect the goodwill and reputation of the business, and make it difficult for the management to have the better customer base. So, it is necessary for Penn to work on this setback and improve it as soon as possible. Evaluation 5: Motivation It is that factor of the business institution which helps in keeping the employees focused towards the working and organisational objective of the firm. Being a leader, it is the duty of Penn to provide the desired motivational support to the employees. It could be in the form of appreciation in the presence of everyone, providing them compensation and other benefits. By doing so, Penn can gain the lost interest and faith of the employees, this also helps in building the progressive workforce. In the absence of desired motivational support by the leader of the organisational institution is turning the employees less engaged with the management. They are also not showing their full concern in the strategical approach and other aspects of Telstra. Due to the negligence of Penn for the labour force of the company, it has been seen that institution is not finding any opportunities in this industry which supports in presenting the new beneficial schemes for the customers. By considering all these activities of Penn, he gets only 3 points in admiring and inspiring the people for the good working. He should build a new form of motivational strategies in the firm, which will help in encouraging the people in making the noticeable plan of action which helps in ensuring the success of Telstraintheinternationaltelecommunicationindustry.Bybringingthenecessary improvement in the communicational and other business tactics, Penn can fulfil this issue of his leadership and generate the more systematic working framework in the establishment. He must know about the necessity of such morale supporting instrument while working in such enormousand establishedworkplace.In thishecan also takeadvantageof hispast experience where he himself was an employee of the considering. By placing own self at that position, Penn can develop the required changes in the firm(Crosby, and Bryson, 2018). Evaluation 6: Power and social influence It points out the control of the leader on the decision taking and other crucial side of the business. By having a strengthen appearance in front of the management, a leader can create the disciplinary environment and self-controlled employees. In the presence of such ability a leader does not have the excess concentration on performance of the employees. As it will help in generating the sense of awareness among the workers itself, by which they can monitor and analyse their own recital and in case of any errors they work on it according to
their own manner. The social influence explains the presence of the leader on admiring the people and maintain a good connection with them. This will help in stimulating the promotion of new planning and schemes of the institution(Yammarino, and Dionne, 2018). If a leader is a good and effective in managing the customer relation then he can also build a faith and trust among those people who already associated with the functional area of the compaby. For this Penn will get 5 marks as he is moderate in both the qualities which is getting discussed in this evaluation. So again, he is holding himself back in presenting the best of his leadership by which he can grab some advantageous possibilities for the business. There is another thing that Penn is only concentrating the goal which he has made at the time of his appointment as the CEO of Telstra. If he actually wants to attain that goal then it is important to involve each and every employee whether they are from distinct department. Pennisliableforestablishmentapropersystematicrelationdifferentsectionofthe establishment and focus on taking the suggestion of each person which helps in showing the concern of organisation’s head towards the plans which are formed by them. In last the overall leadership point for checking the effectiveness of Andy Penn is 26 out of 60, this is quite moderate. This also shows that Penn needs some major changes in his conduct and other leadership style. All and all, the evaluation has cleared the several things, Penn has that ability by which can work an take the Telstra at good position. But he should focus on building the synchronizing form of relation with the employees. By paying more attention to the workforce, Penn can acquire all his objectives in effective manner. The most unappreciated side of Penn leadership is that he is not giving the enough help and support to the employees(Dzubinski, and Diehl,2018). By acknowledging the needs and complication which are faced by the employed during their working and performance of any task, can makethemorehelpingorsupportiveenvironmentattheworkplace.Beforethe implementation of this evaluation on the leadership of Andy Penn, he was portraying as the incompetent CEO of Telstra who has no such quality with which he can help and support his employees and different departments. Later on, he came up as the knowledgeable person, who just have to focus more on his ability to guide people and bring the best from them. He should embrace that quality of leader who emphasis over the power by which a person can constructively encourage the people to reach the set goal of the business. The overall effect of Andy Penn after this evaluation is that he has that potential by which he can become a good and efficient leader of Telstra.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Conclusion In the conclusion of above given report it has been evaluated that leadership is most significant system in the success and failures of the business it helps in finding out that effective person for any business firm which shows his capability in leading the management and employees as well. With help of this report, distinct theories and aspects has been discussed which disclosed the different demands and conduct of the leader in the dynamic situation. The complete evaluation of the leadership style of the leader has concluded a fact that it is not necessary that all the leaders will have those ability by which he can govern the people in most systematic manner. This report has also revealed about the different qualities which needs to be embraced by a leader for the employees as it will allow in turning the work style of the employees according to the needs and demands of the business infrastructure.
References Books and journals- Bhattacharyya, S.S. and Jha, S., 2018. Literature review of leadership theories.Strategic Leadership Models and Theories: Indian Perspectives. Crosby, B.C. and Bryson, J.M., 2018. Why leadership of public leadership research matters: and what to do about it.Public Management Review,20(9), pp.1265-1286. Day, D.V. and Liu, Z., 2018. What is wrong with leadership development and what might be done about it?. InWhat’s Wrong with Leadership?(pp. 226-240). Routledge. Dzubinski, L.M. and Diehl,A.B., 2018. The problemof genderessentialismand its implications for women in leadership.Journal of Leadership Studies. Evans, K., Sanner, B. and Chiu, C.Y., 2021. Shared leadership, unshared burdens: How shared leadership structure schema lowers individual enjoyment without increasing performance.Group & organization management,46(6), pp.1027-1072. Fitzsimmons, T.W. and Callan, V.J., 2020. The diversity gap in leadership: What are we missing in current theorizing?.The Leadership Quarterly,31(4), p.101347. Gibbs, L., Press, F. and Wong, S., 2019. Compliance in a landscape of complexity: Regulation and educational leadership. InChallenging the intersection of policy with pedagogy(pp. 159-174). Routledge. Kozachuk, L.A. and Conley, A.H., 2021. Development-oriented situational supervision: a leadership approach to supervision in counselor education.Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy,8(1), pp.44-55. Latta, G.F., 2020. Modelling the interaction of leadership, culture and power in higher education.Journal of Further and Higher Education,44(9), pp.1188-1206. Prentice, S.B., 2022. Job Satisfaction or Employee Engagement: Regardless of Which Comes First, Supportive Leadership Improves Them Both.Advances in Developing Human Resources, p.15234223221112504. Tarker, D., 2019. Transformational leadership and the proliferation of community college leadership frameworks: A systematic review of the literature.Community College Journal of Research and Practice. Yammarino, F.J. and Dionne, S.D., 2018. Leadership and levels of analysis: clarifications and fixes for what’s wrong. InWhat’s Wrong with Leadership?(pp. 41-57). Routledge.