Annotated Bibliographies on Hydraulic Fracturing for Natural Gas
Verified
Added on 2023/06/04
|7
|1372
|175
AI Summary
This annotated bibliography provides a comprehensive review of the legal, environmental, and economic issues related to hydraulic fracturing for natural gas. The sources cover topics such as the impact on biodiversity, carbon footprint analysis, and chemical disclosure requirements.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES Annotated Bibliographies Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES [1] Hall, K. B.; Taleghani, A. D.In Using technology to avoid trespass liability based on subsurface intrusions of hydraulic fractures, SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, August 25, 2014 - August 27, 2014, Denver, CO, United states, Society of Petroleum Engineers: Denver, CO, United states, 2016. In this article, Hall and Taleghani, examine some legal issues that necessitate the need for explanation of the fractures caused in oil and gas production in United States. They undertook a review of the present industrial practices for the determination of the fracture dimension and pinpointed the uncertaintiesof the technique.The techniquesincluded microrseimic maps, tilt meters and simulation and pressure analysis. The article on final note analyses strategies of technology usage for minimizing legal liability of hydraulic fracturing. [2] Kargbo, D. M.; Wilhelm, R. G.; Campbell, D. J., Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: challenges and potential opportunities.Environ Sci Technol2010, 44 (15), 5679-84. Inthisarticle,Kargbo,WilhelmandCampbellpointsoutthattheanaerobic degradation of organic materials in the sedimentary deposits caused by Marcellus Shale results in the formation of the natural gas. The article also puts forward that although extraction of Marcellus Shale is expensive but it results in job creation and various economic opportunities. They pointed out that implementation of the extraction could also increase the demand for the labours, support business, tax revenues, create new marketing opportunities and ensure financial benefits to the land owners. [3] Kiviat, E., Risks to biodiversity from hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shales.Ann N Y Acad Sci2013, 1286, 1-14.
2ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES In this article, Kiviat thoroughly explained how theHigh-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing (HVHHF) for the mining of the natural gas fromUtica and Marcellus shells causes pollution of the environment and detrimental impacts to the habitat and biota. In addition to the pollution caused by the synthetic chemical, salt and the radionuclide there also occurs land fragmentation by the pipelines, well pads and the constructed roads. According to the article, the extraction also impacted freshwater organisms and species having restricted ranges within geography. [4] Macy, T. R.; Kruse, N. A.; Stuart, B. J., Carbon Footprint Analysis of Source Water for Hydraulic Fracturing: A Case Study of Mine Water Versus Freshwater. Mine Water and the Environment 2015, 34 (1), 20-30. In this article, Macy, Kruse and Stuart undertook an analysis of Carbon Footprint of three source water for the purpose of Hydraulic Fracturing of natural gas. The source of water considered by them included the freshwater from the Ohio River, treated mine water from Corning and freshwater from the Seneca Lake. The emissions of carbon dioxide from the transportation,pumpingandthetreatmentofwaterforsingletimeannualusewere calculated. There were calculations of the productivity increase after the removal of the mine discharge. The results showed that treated mine water emitted more carbon dioxide compared to fresh water. [5]Maqbool,W.;Lee,E.S.,Syngasproductionprocessdevelopmentandeconomic evaluation for gas-to-liquid applications.Chemical Engineering and Technology2014,37 (6), 995-1001.
3ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES According to Magbool, the article portrayed that auto thermal reforming of the natural gas produced ranges of suitable syngas composition that remains compliant with gas to liquid technology used for converting synthetic crude oil. In this article he proposed an improvised and modified design of reforming technique that required lesser consumption of oxygen. The optimal designing of the process is aided by simulative optimization carried out byAspen HYSYS whose economics get evaluated by Aspen Process Economic Analyzer. [6] McLaughlin, M. C.; Borch, T.; Blotevogel, J., Spills of Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals on Agricultural Topsoil: Biodegradation, Sorption, and Co-contaminant Interactions. Environmental Science and Technology2016, 50 (11), 6071-6078. In this article, McLaughlin, Borch and Blotevogel, put forward current understanding of the various processes that prevents toxicity and environmental fate caused due to the hydraulic fracturing of chemicals. The findings from the process highlighted the necessities ofconsideringtheeffectsofco-contaminantswhileevaluatingHydraulicFracturing Chemicals on agricultural topsoil. [7]Murrill, B. J.; Vann, A., Hydraulic fracturing: Chemical disclosure requirements. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: 2013; pp 1-27. In this article, Murrill and Vann describes the present and the proposed regulations and laws at the federal and the state level concerning the chemicals added in the process of hydraulic fracturing that represents a technique freeing natural gas and oil by injecting fluids under immense pressure. [8] Osborn, S. G.; Vengosh, A.; Warner, N. R.; Jackson, R. B., Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011,108 (20), 8172-6.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES In this article, Osborn, Venghosh, Warner and Jackson documented that the Shale gas extractionledtomethanecontaminationofthedrinkingwater.Theyfoundthatthe concentration of methane in drinking water is directly to the proximity of gas well. They also pointed that to ensure sustainable future of the extraction process regulation was necessary.
5ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES References: [1] Hall, K. B.; Taleghani, A. D.In Using technology to avoid trespass liability based on subsurface intrusions of hydraulic fractures, SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, August 25, 2014 - August 27, 2014, Denver, CO, United states, Society of Petroleum Engineers: Denver, CO, United states, 2016. [2] Kargbo, D. M.; Wilhelm, R. G.; Campbell, D. J., Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: challenges and potential opportunities.Environ Sci Technol2010, 44 (15), 5679-84. [3] Kiviat, E., Risks to biodiversity from hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shales.Ann N Y Acad Sci2013, 1286, 1-14. [4] Macy, T. R.; Kruse, N. A.; Stuart, B. J., Carbon Footprint Analysis of Source Water for Hydraulic Fracturing: A Case Study of Mine Water Versus Freshwater. Mine Water and the Environment 2015, 34 (1), 20-30. [5]Maqbool,W.;Lee,E.S.,Syngasproductionprocessdevelopmentandeconomic evaluation for gas-to-liquid applications.Chemical Engineering and Technology2014,37 (6), 995-1001. [6] McLaughlin, M. C.; Borch, T.; Blotevogel, J., Spills of Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals on Agricultural Topsoil: Biodegradation, Sorption, and Co-contaminant Interactions. Environmental Science and Technology2016, 50 (11), 6071-6078. [7]Murrill, B. J.; Vann, A., Hydraulic fracturing: Chemical disclosure requirements. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: 2013; pp 1-27.
6ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES [8] Osborn, S. G.; Vengosh, A.; Warner, N. R.; Jackson, R. B., Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011,108 (20), 8172-6.