This article discusses the concept of value chain and its significance in creating a sustainable business framework. It explains how value chain helps in optimizing resources, reducing bottlenecks, and improving efficiency. The article also highlights the importance of underlying management accounting issues in implementing an effective value chain.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Answer to Question 1: To understand how value chain helps create sustainable framework for business, let us understand what value chain is. A value chain can be defined broadly as a model that describes the business framework of the company using the complete range of activities that the company use or adhere to for producing the products/services. This starts from the idea of a product to be manufactured and ends at distribution of the final product to the consumers. (Tardi, 2019) I am closely associated with a courier agency and there I understand why value chain is laid greatemphasisnow.Thelogisticsindustryinvolvesalotmorenumberofinternal stakeholders or the participants in the value chain who ranges from the final recipient of the post to the transport partners, truck partners, transit partners insurances, collection, packing, sorting and distribution. The value chain in the logistics industry helps in optimization of the resources and time. It exists both ways from company to recipient and sender to company and consists of similar participants both sides. (Zhou, 2019) The value chain helps the firm identify the weak links so that they could be worked upon to reduce bottlenecks and make the system more robust and sustainable. The involvement of so many intermediaries requires greater attention to detail and the logistics model can hardly bear any delay in shipments. Thus focusing on the value chain is imperative. The use of value chain comes with its own set of priorities wherein the focus should also be in underlying management accounting issues which includes a robust ERP system to account properly for the transactions and activities, a highly reliable connectivity as a large number of users across globe uses the same platform for updation of records, efficient tracking system, automatedandsystematicwarehousecontrolsystemaresomeofthebareminimum requirements. All put together value chain analysis helps the company remove lacunas; identify ways of shortening the cycle thus reducing turnaround time and improving efficiency.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Answer to Question 2: 1.The cost of goods manufactured statement for the company is as below: 2.The cost of sales of the company for the year ended 31 December, 2018 is$918,766. 3.The gross profit of the company for the year ended 31 December, 2018 is$481,234. 4.The net profit of the company for the year ended 31 December, 2018 is$190,554.
Workings: The Net Income statement for the company is computed as below:
Answer to Question 3:Part 1 The first step is to compute the total machine and labour hours for both the department as below: BasisMouldingAssembly Machine HrsLabour Hrs No. of Machine/Labour (A)2080 Hours Per Year (B)2,0002,000 Total Hours (A*B)40,0001,60,000 We will now allocate the cost of the support department using the direct method as below: Allocation of Support Costs - Direct Method ParticularsMouldingAssembly Repair Hours Used3,00015,000 Cost Allocated - $1,00,000 / 18000 *3000$16,667 - $1,00,000 / 18000 *15000$83,333 Engineering Hours Used8,50,0001,50,000 Cost Allocated - $5,80,000 / 10,00,000 *8,50,000$4,93,000 - $5,80,000 / 10,00,000 *1,50,000$87,000 Total Allocated Costs (Repair + Engineering)$5,09,667$1,70,333 The overhead rates for moulding and assembly departments are computed as below: ParticularsMouldingAssemblyRepairsEngineering Total Budgeted Cost$5,00,000$7,40,000$1,00,000$5,80,000 Allocation of Support Cost$5,09,667$1,70,333-$1,00,000-$5,80,000 Total Cost After Allocation$10,09,667$9,10,333 Overhead Allocation Basis40,0001,60,000 Overhead Rate$25.24$5.69 Part 2 The overhead cost for thingamabob as per rates above is computed as below: Particulars Mouldin g Assembl yTotal Overhead Rate$25.24$5.69 Multiply: No. of Hours35 Overhead Cost Allocated$75.73$28.45$104.17
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Part 3 Here, we will allocate the cost of the support department using the step down method allocating the repair cost first as below: Allocation of Support Costs - Step Down Method ParticularsMouldingAssemblyEngineering Repair Hours Used3,00015,0002,000 Cost Allocated - $1,00,000 / 20000 *3000$15,000 - $1,00,000 / 20000 *15000$75,000 - $1,00,000 / 20000 *2000$10,000 Cost of Engineering Department$5,80,000 Total Cost of Engineering Department$5,90,000 Engineering Hours Used8,50,0001,50,000 Cost Allocated - $5,90,000 / 10,00,000 *8,50,000$5,01,500$88,500 - $5,90,000 / 10,00,000 *1,50,000 Total Allocated Costs (Repair + Engineering)$5,16,500$1,63,500 The revised overhead rates for moulding and assembly departments are computed as below: ParticularsMouldingAssemblyRepairsEngineering Total Budgeted Cost$5,00,000$7,40,000$1,00,000$5,80,000 Allocation of Support Cost$5,16,500$1,63,500-$1,00,000-$5,80,000 Total Cost After Allocation$10,16,500$9,03,500 Overhead Allocation Basis40,0001,60,000 Overhead Rate$25.41$5.65 Part 4 The overhead cost for thingamabob as per rates above is computed as below: Particulars Mouldin g Assembl yTotal Overhead Rate$25.41$5.65 Multiply: No. of Hours35 Overhead Cost Allocated$76.24$28.23$104.47
Part 5 Here, we will allocate the cost of the support department using the step down method allocating the repair cost first as below Allocation of Support Costs -Reciprocal Method ParticularsMouldingAssemblyEngineeringRepair Repair Hours Used3,00015,0002,0000 Engineering Hours Used8,50,0001,50,00002,50,000 Budgeted Costs$5,00,000$7,40,000$5,80,000$1,00,000 Allocation of Repair Cost-$1,00,000 - $1,00,000 / 20000 *3000$15,000 - $1,00,000 / 20000 *15000$75,000 - $1,00,000 / 20000 *2000$10,000 Total Cost to be allocated further$5,15,000$8,15,000$5,90,000$0 Allocation of Engineering Cost-$5,90,000 - $5,90,000 / 12,50,000 *8,50,000$4,01,200 - $5,90,000 / 12,50,000 *1,50,000$70,800 - $5,90,000 / 12,50,000 *2,50,000$1,18,000 Total Cost to be allocated further$9,16,200$8,85,800$0$1,18,000 Allocation of Repair Cost-$1,18,000 - $1,18,000 / 20000 *3000$17,700 - $1,18,000 / 20000 *15000$88,500 - $1,18,000 / 20000 *2000$11,800 Total Cost to be allocated further$9,33,900$9,74,300$11,800$0 Allocation of Engineering Cost-$11,800 - $11,800 / 12,50,000 *8,50,000$8,024 - $11,800 / 12,50,000 *1,50,000$1,416 - $11,800 / 12,50,000 *2,50,000$2,360 Total Cost to be allocated further$9,41,924$9,75,716$0$2,360 Allocation of Repair Cost-$2,360 - $2,360 / 20000 *3000$354$0 - $2,360 / 20000 *15000$1,770 - $2,360 / 20000 *2000$236 Total Cost to be allocated further$9,42,278$9,77,486$236$0 Allocation of Engineering Cost-$236 - $236/ 12,50,000 *8,50,000$160 - $236/ 12,50,000 *1,50,000$28 - $236 / 12,50,000 *2,50,000$47 Total Cost to be allocated further$9,42,438$9,77,514$0$47
The revised overhead rates for moulding and assembly departments are computed as below: ParticularsMouldingAssemblyRepairsEngineering Total Budgeted Cost$5,00,000$7,40,000$1,00,000$5,80,000 Allocation of Support Cost$9,42,438$9,77,514-$1,00,000-$5,80,000 Total Cost After Allocation$14,42,438$17,17,514 Overhead Allocation Basis40,0001,60,000 Overhead Rate$36.06$10.73 Part 6 The overhead cost for thingamabob as per rates above is computed as below: Particulars Mouldin g Assembl yTotal Overhead Rate$36.06$10.73 Multiply: No. of Hours35 Overhead Cost Allocated$108.18$53.67$161.86 Part 7 To, The Chief Financial Officer Bezos Ltd. Sub: Allocation of Overhead Dear Sir, The cost of the service departments have been allocated to the production using three different methods which are Direct, Step Down and Reciprocal Method and the results of all three varies noticeable. Under the direct method, the cost of the thingamabob is computed at $104.17, it is $104.47 under step-down method and $161.86 under reciprocal method. It is noticed that the reciprocal method is a more accurate method of allocating costs as the service departments uses their services interchangeably and thus there costs should also be apportioned between them. We see that under direct method no costs between services departments are allocated while in step down, only costs of repair are allocated. It is only under reciprocal method that costs of both the departments are allocated to them and thus an appropriate measurement of the cost is arrived at.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Accuracy of estimation of costs leads to proper pricing and thus better estimation of prices to be quoted. It is recommended that we use reciprocal method for our purpose. Thanks Answer to Question 4: 1.The pre-determined overhead rate for each of the department is computed as below: Computation of Pre-Determined Overhead Rate Particulars Preparatio nFishing Manufacturing Overhead$2,85,600 $6,84,00 0 Machine Hours6,8009,000 Labour Cost$2,40,000 $3,80,00 0 Overhead Rate$42$1.80 The overhead rate for preparation department is computed on the basis of total machine hours used and for fishing it is based on total labour cost. 2.The total cost for Job 842 is computed as below: Job Cost Sheet for Job 842 ParticularsPreparation Fishin g Direct Materials$1,300$1,420 Direct Labours cost$1,640$1,800 Manufacturing Overhead - 40 Mc Hrs * $42/Hr$1,680 - $1,800 * 1.80$3,240 Total Cost$4,620$6,460 Thus, the total cost for the Job 842 combining the costs of both the dept. is$11,080. 3.The total overhead is under applied as the actual costs exceed the budgeted costs of the company as illustrated below: DepartmentsBudgeted CostsActual CostsRemark Preparation$2,85,600$6,82,500Under Applied Fishing$6,84,000$3,75,800Over Applied Total Costs$9,69,600$10,58,300Under Applied
Answer to Question 5:Part 1 Under the weighted average method, we will first compute the cost per equivalent unit as below: Computation of Cost Per Equivalent unit for the weaving department ParticularsDirect MaterialConversionTotal WIP - March 1$1,88,000$88,000$2,76,000 Cost Incurred during the month$3,28,000$5,45,600$8,73,600 Total Cost$5,16,000$6,33,600$11,49,600 Equivalent Units60,00052,000 Cost per Equivalent Unit$8.60$12.18 Based on this, the cost of goods completed and transferred out and WIP is as below: Part 2 Under the FIFO method, we will first compute the cost per equivalent unit as below: Computation of Cost Per Equivalent unit for the weaving department ParticularsDirect MaterialConversionTotal WIP - March 1$1,88,000$88,000$2,76,000 Cost Incurred during the month$3,28,000$5,45,600$8,73,600 Total Cost$5,16,000$6,33,600$11,49,600 Equivalent Units40,00044,000 Cost per Equivalent Unit$12.90$14.40
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Based on this, the cost of goods completed and transferred out and WIP is as below:
References Tardi, C. (2019).How Value Chains Work. [online] Investopedia. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/valuechain..asp on 11 Apr. 2019. Zhou, X. (2019). [online] File.scirp.org. Retrieved from https://file.scirp.org/pdf/AJIBM_2013041710325632.pdf on 11 Apr. 2019.