diversification of the Aposematic Signals Assignment PDF
22 Pages7508 Words151 Views
Added on 2021-08-03
diversification of the Aposematic Signals Assignment PDF
Added on 2021-08-03
BookmarkShareRelated Documents
Running head: APOSEMATISM Aposematism: The diversification of the Aposematic Signals [Name of the Student] [Name of the Institute] [Date]
Aposematism2 Abstract The diversification of the aposematic signals in a framework of Müllerian mimicry is an intriguing phenomenon. While the theory of aposematism and mimicry suggests the evolution towards a single aposematic signal, impressive variations can be observed between populations, and this on a small spatial scale. It was assumed that the spatial variation in selection pressures generated by different predators could be the cause of this phenomenon. In order to test this hypothesis, we studied the transition between two geographic systems characterized by distinct aposematic patterns in mimetic and toxic frogs (Dendrobatidae) by combining the tools of population genetics with ecological tools. In each of these systems, Ranitomeya imitator lives in sympatry with ventrimaculata or variabilis. This is the main example suggesting that in a framework of Müllerian mimicry, there is no convergence of the aposematic signals of the two species, but rather unidirectional convergence where imitator, being polymorphic, imitates monomorphic species with which it is sympatric. First, this review refutes the premises that suggest that R. imitator converges to the aposematic signal of another species. The high genetic similarity between the model species suggests that they have diverged more recently than the populations of R. imitator or that they are still connected by gene flow. These reviews indicate that these species have been wrongly identified as different species. In fact, the identification of the imitator species based on phenotypic variability is invalidated in this system since R. imitator and R. variabilis / ventrimaculata demonstrate the same variability. Second, this study demonstrate that predation varies spatially, both in intensity and in direction, thus creating a heterogeneous landscape of selection pressures. Thus, strong stabilizing predation pressures allow the geographic organization of different aposematic signals to be maintained and explain the uniformity ii of these signals as well as mimetic relationships. On the other hand, the temporary relaxation of predation pressures allows the appearance of new aposematic phenotypes via neutral evolutionary processes, leading to a high polymorphism in these populations. The interaction of these selective modes has enabled us to demonstrate for the first time how Wright's evolutionary theory (shifting balance theory) allows adaptive diversification in a natural system. To conclude, this study has made it possible to highlight how dynamic Müllerian mimicry systems can be. The spatial alternation between neutral evolutionary processes and natural selection allows the emergence of new aposematic phenotypes on a local scale, as well as the
Aposematism3 appearance of a geographic organization of warning signals and of Mullerian mimicry relationships. Keywords: Aposematism, mimicry, polymorphism, spatial structure, predation, diversification.
Aposematism4 Table of Contents Abstract............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction......................................................................................................................................5 Discussion........................................................................................................................................6 Effectiveness of Aposematic Signals...........................................................................................6 Phenomena that Arise from Aposematism...................................................................................9 Aposematic Signals and Mimetic Relationships..........................................................................9 Genetic Differentiation of Populations......................................................................................11 Findings......................................................................................................................................12 The Role of Predators in Maintaining Polymorphism............................................................14 The Diversification of Aposematic Signals............................................................................15 Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................17 References......................................................................................................................................18
Aposematism5 Aposematism: The diversification of the Aposematic Signals Introduction Aposematism is an adaptive strategy that allows certain organisms to protect themselves from a warning signal clearly perceptible by potential predators, in order to warn them that they represent a danger and that they must be avoided (Thomas et al. 2003). This strategy would therefore be beneficial for both the prey and the predator. Although several types of warning signals have been documented (i.e. coloring, odor, audible signal; Ruxton et al. 2004), the bright coloring in relation to the toxicity of certain organisms is a model that has attracted the attention of scientists. The objective of this study is to highlight the selective processes responsible for the aposematic polymorphism, by controlling for the other neutral evolutionary processes and phytogeography (Mappes et al. 2005). After observing many species of neotropical butterflies with similarities in coloring patterns, Henry Walter Bates (1862), hypothesized that this was an example of natural selection where edible species resemble toxic species in order to gain protection against predators. This situation was later called Batésien mimicry. Bates also documented a number of cases where several species, all toxic, were similar to each other. Since being toxic confers protection against predators, he suggested that the convergence of these phenotypes should be caused by a similar adaptation to the same abiotic environmental conditions. The naturalist Johannes Friedrich Müller who also worked in Brazil made the same observations and published 16 years after Bates an explanation for the phenotypic similarity observed between different toxic species. Müller's (1878) explanation was extremely simple: "Species with tusks are alike and thus share the costs of educating predators" (Müllerian mimicry). Although at first glance, the advantages conferred on mimetic species are clear, the evolutionary mechanisms allowing to reach this situation remain unclear and subject to many controversies. In order to understand the theme of this study, the theories associated with the phenomena of Aposematism and Müllerian mimicry were presented. This allow researcher to properly target the issues addressed, namely the controversy associated with the direction of mimetic relationships between species and the theoretical problems arising from the diversification of aposematic signals (Thomas et al. 2003). The key concepts relating to the
Aposematism6 genetic diversification of populations, as well as the biological model chosen, namely the small tropical frog Ranitomeya imitator, will finally be presented before approaching the objectives. Discussion The Diversification of Aposematic Signals in Müllerian Mimicry Systems is a Puzzling Phenomenon (Ruxton et al. 2004). The aposematic signals warn predators that their potential prey has defenses such as toxicity or dangerous weapons.Aposematism explains colors or other showy signals that are not sexual characters due to selection.This phenomenon is common in insects and exothermal vertebrates, but rare in mammals and particularly in small herbivores.To verify the role of showy colors, experimental studies tested the hypothesis that they could allow them to sometimes blend into vegetation by comparing, in a natural environment, the detectability of lemmings and that of Sundevall voles.The results show that the lemmings are more conspicuous than the voles thus confirming that the colors are well aposematic and not cryptic. (Thomas et al. 2003). Effectiveness of Aposematic Signals The effectiveness of an aposematic signal in a habitat depends on two factors: the cognitive capacity of the predator and the abundance of the signal. Thus, it is essential that the predator can associate coloring with danger, so that the latter avoids this type of signal (Ruxton et al. 2004; Mappes et al. 2005). Avoiding a signal is generally an experience-based response, although in some cases it is an innate response (Pough 1988; Ruxton et al. 2004). In addition, the effectiveness of an aposematic signal in a habitat is directly proportional to its frequency (Sherratt 2008). Thus, when the aposematic signal is frequent in a habitat, it is easy to understand that it represents an advantageous evolutionary strategy: a small proportion of the population will be killed, and predators will quickly learn to avoid the signal. Thus, the per capita survival rate of an abundant aposematic signal will be relatively high. On the other hand, when the signal is scarce, it is difficult to understand how it would be advantageous. This is mainly due to the fact that a rare aposematic prey should be subject to high per capita mortality, since a large proportion or even the entire prey population will be killed during the learning period of predators (Lindstrom et al. 2001; Speed 2001). From an evolutionary point of view, several hypotheses have been proposed in order to explain the
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.