This paper analyzes how linguistic politeness model is expressed in indirect strategies in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CILI). It discusses the challenges faced in CLIL education and the importance of learning English as a second language.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS1 Argumentative essays Name Institution
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS2 Linguistic politeness model Language politeness, can be defined as how language is used to express one’s interlocutor’s desires and feelings in a conversation to enhance the interpersonal relationship in a way that is generally accepted by ones’ society or cultural behavior. Different languages can be used to communicate which may be verbal, written, or sign language. English language is one of the most widely used languages for communication and also for learning. However, to many, English language is not their first language. Some go to school to learn the language while others learn the language and later use it to learn other driplines. This paper tries to analyze how linguistic politeness model is expressed in indirect strategies in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CILI). In the last few decades, there has been an increase in the use of English language as a medium of learning in non-language subjects. In Europe, the EU language policies on multilingualism have provided grounds for the implementation of CLIL education. Internationalization and globalization developments also have played a key role in enhancing the use of English as a learning tool. (Dalton- Puffer, 2005)Urges that learners develop communicative competence while they use the language to learn as compared to when they use the traditional EFL classes. In recent decades, people are now widely embracing the importance of communicative competence where people understand and gain more knowledge of a language by taking part in communicative events. In CLIL classes, the learners are expected to be offered the required conditions for second language learning which may include exposing them to the actual meaning of the language use. It’s also necessary for the learners to be provided with naturalistic conditions to enhance proper learning of the second language. The class offers meaningful interaction and comprehensible output. Sociocultural opinions on the teaching of the language try to emphasize the nature of the language since it’s a social process where people interact through social practices where language learning is carried out. CLIL classes main aim is to ensure that learners attain communicative competence, which consists of grammatical and pragmatic competence in the second language by using it not only in classroom activities but also in their day to day activities (Tang & Tian, 2015). However, CLIL education faces a lot of challenges. For instance, some students encounter difficulties in understanding some classes. It requires one first to have a deep understanding of the second language which contains ambiguous words with different meanings for one to understand the
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS3 classes. The whole processes of learning a new language to create a foundation for another class does not only make the class difficult but also unfriendly. Some students find it hard to learn something they are not familiar with to learn new concepts. Others have a pride of their native language while others have a wrong notion about the new language making the whole learning process difficult (Martínez- Adrián, Gallardo-del-Puerto & Basterrechea, 2019). On the other hand, English teaching to people whose first language is not English is gaining popularity today. English classes are taught in different countries of the world where English is not their native language. The urge of more people to learn English is contributed by so many factors such as globalization and internationalization. Globalization enables people from different countries to share ideas, trade, and socializing freely (Zarobe & Zenotz, 2015). However, this cannot be achieved unless they share a common language. English being the most common widespread language, people who don’t understand the language prefer to learn it to interact with others of different nationalism. English is not only used in communication but can also be used to learn other disciplines. Nevertheless, EFL is not that easy. Spellings and grammar require memorization since some words spell the same way but sound differently while others spell the same but have different meanings. This makes it difficult for learners to identify the correct word to use. EFL learning also consumes one’s time and money (Gierlinger, E. M. (2017). Insight of the above, it is evident that people from different parts of the world need to communicate in one way or another. Use of English as a common language makes their interaction effective and efficient. Therefore, both EFL and CLIL learning is crucial for people whose English is not their first language. Although the learning process has several challenges such as pragmatic competence, it’s essential to learn English as a second language and also use it as a tool for learning to be competent in the modern world.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS4 References Gierlinger, E. M. (2017). Teaching CLIL?.Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education,5(2), 187-213. Martínez-Adrián, M., Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Basterrechea, M. (2019). On self-reported use of communication strategies by CLIL learners in primary education.Language Teaching Research,23(1), 39-57. Tang, M., & Tian, J. (2015). Associations between Chinese EFL graduate students' beliefs and language learning strategies.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,18(2), 131-152. Zarobe, Y. R., & Zenotz, V. (2015). Reading strategies and CLIL: The effect of training in formal instruction.The Language Learning Journal,43(3), 319-333. Argument on Oranges
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS5 According to Winterson everybody has a story which he or she explains differently. There was a time when polysemy and postmodernism were celebrated as cultural modes of production, a pragmatist message aiming at changing the minds of people about social issues but it is a ring which is old-fashioned. “Oranges are not the only fruit” existed as a pragmatist text. While introducing this text, Waterston attempts to challenge the features of church power, heterosexuality supposed normality and homes. Winterson admired to change a novel in such a way that it could become a series in the television. The argument in this paper is how the pragmatic strategies assisted in the upcoming of the television form of a novel on lesbian coming-of-age. It consists of a cultural production focusing of challenging the commonsense prejudices. It demonstrates that commonsense gains everything from functioning with prevalent cultural forms (Pearce, 2013). The paper will be demonstrating an argument from the popular narrative which will help in facilitating effective announcement of radical thoughts. The story demonstrates about a girl known as Jess. Jess was raised by a stern fundamentalist Christian mom in Northern England at a small town. Jess fell in love with a girl called Melanie at sixteen years and they were all about the same age. The evangelical society led by Jess mother and the pastor wanted to destroy this relationship. In this attempt they humiliated the two girls hence subjecting them to a compulsory exorcism. Jess suffered traumatic lesbian association due to this compulsory exorcism. From that moment, Jess never renounces her sexuality and goes to the university leaving home and her church. The case presented gives a plot that can be can demonstrate a thematic organization of activities and also provides a structure similar to that of a television script. The television account re-orders the novel to loose chronology to familiar shape and a more straightforward biological narrative.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS6 At the first site, the novel was seen as unlikely to be adapted in the primetime television drama. The novel however presents a dazzling characterization but its plot is not linear and interspersed with meditations and fables (Pearce, 2013). The subject is the novel is Jess who was who was betrayed by her mother who was dedicated to her religious. In the novel, for its aesthetic appeal, “Oranges” depend on linguistic and formal acrobatics instead of description and narrative. The novel portrays the lesbian protagonist in a sensitive and a funny way hence acquiring a cult status among women who identified women in the Great Britain. The theme of lesbianism in the novel could not be shown at BBC during that time and many people campaigned against heterosexuality. The government wanted to prohibit cases of heterosexuality and this increased cautiousness about cases of gayism. In 1900 the novel was shown in the television and it had a wide audience even though it received a lot of criticism. The novel received critics but the message was hailed successfully. We can suggest that the adaptation of this novel in the television showed that they would bring the identity of lesbians. The audience in this novel are mostly the people who are minor in the society, which is the lesbians, and could respond sympathetically the focus on the lives of women together with affirming the identity of lesbian protagonists (Hallam, 2014). It is different story how the novel is structured to acquire response from the mainstream television. The issue of lesbians never gained a recognition by the entire society because not many people would appreciate. The regimes and social equality gains brought by the feminist activist would never get positive connotations. The novel was written and produced by different people meaning that they were all aware of the politics regarding sexuality that would arise from the novel. The novel has a presumed homophobia to the mainstream audience and it goes against the idea of normal sexuality. The
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS7 novel raises the question on whether heterosexuals should follow their heart or just play safe to avoid critics from the society. Winterson encourage people to follow their heart which is a contribution to the lesbian community but it provides a realism presentation of the novel. The narrative has a different story than other Television series making it unique. In the novel, Jess develops her identity through her experience and she is also subjected to suffering due to the traumatic experience during her childhood. The novel therefore aims at showing that people should follow their heart instead of fearing.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS8 References Hallam, J. (2014). Power Plays: Gender, Genre and Lynda La Plante. In British Television Drama (pp. 214-223). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Pearce, L. (2013). The rhetorics of feminism: Readings in contemporary cultural theory and the popular press. Routledge.