logo

ASIC v Narain: Violation of Director Duties and Misleading Claims

   

Added on  2023-06-04

12 Pages945 Words373 Views
Business and
Corporations Law
ASIC v Narain [2008] FCAFC 120

Introduction
In ASIC v Narain case, the issues relating to
violation of directors duties was raised.
A lawsuit was filed by ASIC against
Citrofresh International Ltd (CIL) for making
misleading claim to ASX.
Mr Narain was also involved in the suit
since he was acting as the managing
director and CEO of the corporation.
The case was rejected by the trial judge,
however, the Federal Court revered the
decision.

Background of the
Case
Two letters were sent by CIL to the ASX
on 27th September 2005.
The company claim to find the cure for
HIV and method to prevent common
cold.
These letters were sent to the ASX by
the company secretary of the
enterprise.
However, Mr Narain was involved in the
process of drafting of these letters.

Background of the
Case
The ASIC alleged that the company and
Mr Narain has violated the provisions
given under section 1041H of the act
(ASIC, 2010).
The trial judge rejected the claims
raised by ASIC.
However, the judgement of the Federal
Court reversed the order given by the
trial judge and hold both the company
and Mr Narain liable.

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
(Solved) Business and Corporations Law Assignment
|10
|808
|90

ASIC v Narain: Analysis of Director Duties Breached
|10
|2486
|267

Business and Corporations Law Assignment
|10
|2482
|15

Business Law Case Analysis
|10
|2488
|358

Corporation and Business Law - ASIC v Narain [2008] FCAFC 120
|8
|2282
|182

ASIC v Padbury Mining Limited: Violation of Director Duties
|12
|1112
|491