The ASRS Legal Case involves legal issues such as incompetence in project management, disclosure of confidential information, and failure of the project. The parties involved can take legal action against the managing director, general manager, and external contractors. Super Cola Taiwan can also initiate legal proceedings against the administrator and DB. Read more about the solutions and legal issues at Desklib.
BookmarkShareRelated Documents
ASRS LEGAL CASE
Table of ContentsSOLUTION 1.................................................................................................................................................3SOLUTION 2:-...............................................................................................................................................3SOLUTION 3:-...............................................................................................................................................4SOLUTION 4:-...............................................................................................................................................4References...................................................................................................................................................6
SOLUTION 1.The various parties that are involved in the contract might adapt the legal directions like the DB believes that the market could be mainly developed in Asia, which mainly provides high rising automated warehouse solutions at more reasonable rates which are demanded by the good suppliers by using the variations in normally used ASRS configuration.1The parties involved in the contract can take legal action against the managing director and the general manager of the company as they shows their experiences and qualifications false and appoint the individuals for the completion of the work with no qualification which results to liquidation of the company. They can recover their loss from the owners of the company.SOLUTION 2:-The motivations of the two external contractors, which were described by the full-time employees of the company were questioned. These two contractors were approached by the client, and they provided the inside information about the project to the clients for which they received a handsome amount which contribute to terminate the contract with DB. The two contractors were liable for the winding up of the company and in the legal sense they were liable for disclosing the personal information of the company to the client and action can be taken accordingly and in the ethical sense 1BURNS, BEVERLY, ARCO Alaska Inc., A, 'Development Implications And Systems Tract Architecture Of Zones 2B And 2C, Ivishak Sandstone, North Slope, Alaska' (2000) 84 Bulletin.