This assignment explores the concepts of cost accounting and budgetary analysis within the context of a PVC sheet manufacturing company. It analyzes production costs, identifies areas for improvement like minimizing waste, and proposes activity-based budgeting as an effective approach for resource allocation and cost control.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING 1.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION4 TASK 14 P1 Explaining the concept of management accounting & the essential requirement of different MAS4 P2 Evaluating different methods for the managerial accounting reporting5 TASK 26 P3 Computation of costs per unit under marginal and absorption costing and explaining their difference6 TASK 38 P4 Explaining the advantages and disadvantages of different types of budgetary planning tools 8 A. Computing the standard costs of PVC sheets required to manufacture 4,000 keyboards 9 B. Computing the material price and quantity variance10 TASK 410 P5 Comparing dell with HP in order to adapt MAS to respond financial problems10 CONCLUSION12 REFERENCES13 1.
2.Table of figures Table 1 Calculation of unit cost under absorption & marginal costing6 Table 2 Calculation of cost of production & sale under absorption costing6 Table 3 Calculation of gross profit and net profit under absorption costing7 Table 4 Calculation of cost of production & sale under marginal costing7 Table 5 Calculation of contribution and net margin under marginal/variable costing7
INTRODUCTION Managerial accounting is a process of reporting and communication business performance to the mangers and top executives which aids in right strategy formulation and smarter business decisions.It is totally different from the financial accounting because in this, firm’s top directors not only look after the preparation of annual accounts but their main target is to gather essential or important information for bringing out efficiency into the operations and ensure sustainable success. The present assignment here emphasizes on the managerial accounting operations and reporting for a leading information technology & cloud computing service provider firm, named Dell. In the report, various techniques like cost calculation, standard costing and different kinds of managerial accounting system will be analysed. 1.TASK 1 1.P1 Explaining the concept of management accounting & the essential requirement of different MAS Management accounting is a process of furnishing accounting information by the managers in order to make viable and feasible business decisions. It serves vital information to the managers for making right planning through modifying, analysing and interpreting the financial information. It plays a significant role in Dell to streamline their daily operations, effective and efficient functionality and appropriate business planning. At the same time, it also helps firm to put better control by comparison of the actual performance with the targets and co-ordinate various functions. Management accounting system can be deployed by the Dell to deliver required information to the managers on time for making better decisions. It helps to generate reports that allow managers to make plans, policies and strategies for the smooth functionality. With reference to Dell, its managers can take assistance of the following system, described here as under: Cost accounting system:Dell is a profit-oriented business which aims at maximizing their net profitability by effective control over their cost. Thus, CAS furnishes cost related data and provides it to the managers i.e. cost of material purchase, labour’s wages and others which helps in valuation of closing stock (Banerjee and Das, 2017). By analysing the cost reports, top managers and personnel can create innovative planning and decisions to minimize expenditures and thereby drive better return. Here, two types of cost accounting system can be used by the Dell that are presented here as under:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Job order costing: This system accumulates all the costs incurred i.e. material, labour etc. for each job work and enables Dell’s managerial team to find out the total cost of the order placed by the customer. By identifying the cost, manager can make good pricing decisions at where they will be ready to offer their goods to the consumer and meet their return requirement (Romano, 2015). Process costing:Unlike the above, this system accumulates or incorporates cost of manufacturing for each of the process. It is helpful for those companies where goods are manufactured in different divisions and accumulation of costs of all the departments helps to find out the total cost. Batch costing: This system is useful for determining the cost for a group of items and services produced by the Dell. It helps to identify and determine total batch costs comprising fixed and variable costs (Bhimani and et.al., 2013). Here, per unit batch cost can be founded out by dividing the total costs with the number of units produced in batch. Price optimization: This system is very useful in distributing the market into various sub- sets and thereby defines the target market to receive maximum yield. Dell’s managerial team can use it to find out the extent to which consumers are price-sensitive (Price optimization, 2015). With the help of this, top managers can track that how change in their offering prices will bring fluctuations in the market demand, which helps to set a right price for the target market to earn maximum return. 1.P2 Evaluating different methods for the managerial accounting reporting In the business, managers acquire various set of operational data from different reports and analyse the information for making viable & informed decisions to ensure sustainable progress. The main reports which Dell’s higher authority can use for designing the best strategies and decisions are enumerated here as under: Job cost reports: As discussed earlier, that job costing system accumulates the expenditures made by the firm for manufacturing a given number of units (Yigitbasioglu, 2017). Thus, this system generates costing reports for every job work, which assist decision-makers in cost evaluation and right selling pricing decisions. Accounts receivable/debtors reports: This reports indicates the amount of outstanding debtors, their bills, amount and maturity dates as well. It facilitates credit collection division of Dell to make better plans for taking out money promptly from the debtors to maintain adequate cash
resources in the business (Choi, Kulick and Mayer, 2009). Budgeted reports: Every departmental manager set standard target for their divisional revenues and payments made for the continual of operations. Thus, this reports delivers information to the policy makers about targets which is compared with the actual results to detect deviations whether favourable or unfavourable and thereby make remedial actions to combat negative variances. Inventory management reports: Stock management is an essential part of the operational management so as to maintain stock at sufficient level for safeguarding against sudden increase in the consumer demand (Fullerton, Kennedy and Widener, 2013). Such reports delivers information regarding hourly wages rate, closing stock & others which managers analyse for the right inventory planning & its management. 1.TASK 2 2.P3 Computation of costs per unit under marginal and absorption costing and explaining their difference The main difference marginal & absorption costing methods, is that, former uses only the variable cost for measuring cost of production whereas later gives consideration to both the fixed & variable costs for valuation of closing inventory (Banerjee and Das, 2017). Table 1 Calculation of unit cost under absorption & marginal costing ParticularsFull/Absorption costingVariable/Marginal costing Direct Material purchase2020 Direct labour88 Variable manufacturing overheads44 Fixed manufacturing overheads10- Costs/unit4232 Table 2 Calculation of cost of production & sale under absorption costing Items
Material Labor Variable manufacturing overheads Fixed manufacturing overheads Total cost of production Add: Beginning inventory Less: Closing stock (10000) Cost of goods sold (COGS) Table 3 Calculation of gross profit and net profit under absorption costing Items Sales Less: cost of goods sold Gross margin (sales - cost of goods sold) Fixed selling and administrative expenses Variable selling & administrative expense Net profit Table 4 Calculation of cost of production & sale under marginal costing Items Material Labor Variable manufacturing overheads Total cost of production Add: Beginning inventory Less: Closing stock (10000) Cost of goods sold (COGS) Table 5 Calculation of contribution and net margin under marginal/variable costing Items
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Sales Less: cost of goods sold Gross margin (sales - cost of goods sold) Variable selling & administrative expense Contribution Fixed selling and administrative expenses Fixed manufacturing expenses Net profit Interpretations: The outcome of the results measured that unit cost under full as well as marginal costing have been derived to 42 & 32 GBP. It is comparatively lower in the marginal costing because fixed manufacturing overheads worth 10GBP per unit has been ignored by it. Moreover, cost of production & cost of goods sold under absorption costing computed to 2,100,000 & 1,680,000, however, in contrast, under full costing, it has been derived to 1,600,000 & 1,280,000 which is comparatively less because of ignorance of fixed production overheads (Kaplan and Atkinson, 2015). The net profitability margin under both the costing methods has been founded out to 180,000 & 80,000. It is greater in full costing because stock valuation considering the fixed costs bring proportionate decrease in the cost of goods sold which is not so with the marginal costing as a result, net profit has been dropped down to 80,000GBP. 1.TASK 3 2.P4 Explaining the advantages and disadvantages of different types of budgetary planning tools Budgeting procedure is an essential or vital component of managerial control which is a system of planning, coordinating, supervising and controlling the day to day functions. It can be defined as a plan to predict or forecast possible results of future period’s operational activities so as to make better plan in the current period for deriving desired results. Different types of budgetary tools that are available to Dell’s managers are presented here as under: Incremental budgeting:Traditionally, managers use a simplified approach, in which, they either consider previous year’s budget or actual performance as a base and some incremental amount is added into this to arrive the budget for the future period (Mauro, Cinquini and Grossi, 2016). Here, a slightly adjustments can be made by the Dell’s manager for inflation, increasing
selling price, high cost and others. Advantages: a.1.It is very easy to prepare and can be prepared promptly because it requires a little bit changes in the previous period’s budget or actual results. b.2.Less time in the budget preparation leads to less costs of preparation. c.3.It prevents possible conflicts among all the departmental managers of the Dell because it follows consistent approach for the resource allocation. Limitations: ••It favour the execution of all the activities which believe that current running costs will be incur in future period’s also thus it give rises to the unnecessarily spending in the unproductive functions. ••Managers and workers are not motivated or incentivised to reduce their costs because they are not rewarded with any incentive for the same (Renz, 2016). ••It decides unchallenging performance targets which do not encourage employees or managers to accept tough challenges for maximizing operational efficiency, minimizing cost and others. Zero-based budgeting: This method overcome the drawback of incremental budgeting which tries to make optimal resource allocation by forcing every managers of all the Dell’s division to fully justify every activity and cost properly which leads to optimum resource utilization. Benefits: ••It helps to motivate staff by setting challenging performance targets and also encourage them to take initiatives to control cost (Sehgal, 2017). ••It helps to respond changing conditions by considering the underlying trends in the industry and market. ••Another advantage of ZBB methods is that it helps in an efficient and optimum resource allocation. Drawbacks: ••It may be possible that Dell’s departmental manager may not have required skills to create the budget, which in turn, training may be required which takes time and cost as well. ••Many-times, decisions are made at the time of budget creation which is not accepted by some managers which may leads to have a detrimental effect on the firm.
Activity based budgeting: Under this method, budget is prepared by the managers, in which, spending proposition is totally based upon past period’s production activities (Saladrigues and Tena, 2017). They examine the cost of various activities and every activity is allocated with the fund derived from the related activity. Benefit: ••It draws managerial attention towards overheads which may be incur in the large proportion of total costs of the Dell. ••It helps firm to control the cause of the cost for the better cost management. ••ABB method helps to provide an important insight to the management for total quality management by presenting a link between costs with the service delivery system. Drawback: ••High level of understanding is the first and foremost requirement of ABB, thus, in case of lack of expertise knowledge and speciality, the technique cannot be applied. ••Training requirement also leads to drive excessive costs to the Dell and results in lesser yield. 1.A. Computing the standard costs of PVC sheets required to manufacture 4,000 keyboards Standard costs refers to the costs that Dell’s production manager has expected to incur for producing 4000 keyboards. In other words, it refers to the target cost that has been decided to be incur in the production of target number of units (Schaltegger, Gibassier and Zvezdov, 2013). With the stated scenario, Dell has been decided to produce 4000 keyboards which standard costs has been computed here as under: PVC sheets/per unit – 2.5 feet Price per sheet – 3.60 GBP Total sheets required to produce 4,000 keyboards = 4,000*2.5 = 10,000 feet Costs of 100,000 PVC sheets = 10,000*3.60 = 36,000 GBP Thus, standard costs of 4,000 key boards = 36,000 GBP Actual costs = 37,400GBP Difference: standard cost – actual cost = 36,000 GBP – 37,400 GBP = 1,400 GBP (Adverse/Unfavorable)
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
As per the founded results, Dell has incurred a negative variance of 1,400 GBP on the production of 4,000 keyboards because targeted cost has been decided to 36,000 GBP whilst the actual costs has been set to 37,400 GBP. 1.B. Computing the material price and quantity variance Material price variance (MPV): Actual quantity (standard price – actual price) = 10,000 feet (3.60 GBP – 3.40 GBP) = 10,000 feet (0.20 GBP) = 2,000 (favourable) Material quantity variance (MQV): Actual price (standard quantity – actual quantity) = 3.4GBP (10,000 feet – 11,000 feet) = 3.4GBP (-1,000 feet) = 3,400 GBP (adverse) From the results, it can be seen that MPV is founded positive to 2,000GBP because Dell has decided that per sheet, it would have to pay 3.60GBP whilst, in the actual market, there is a cheaper availability of sheets at a price of 3.40GBP reduced the targeted cost by 2,000 which is good. On the contrary side, MQV reported negative results to 3,400 GBP. It is because, firm has decided to use 10,000 feet of PVC sheet for producing 4,000 keyboards while the actual consumption of PVC sheets reported to 11,000 feet higher by 1,000. Inefficient and unoptimal use of PVC sheets, theft activities and wastage of the sheets may be the reason behind high use of material, as a result, it leads to cause a negative variance of 3,400 GBP. 1.TASK 4 2.P5 Comparing dell with HP in order to adapt MAS to respond financial problems In the stated case, it has been given that Dell is suffering profitability issues in comparison to the competitors which impact its operational results and competitive position in an adverse manner. In order to overcome such financial difficulties, Dell’s management can be suggested with the following ways that are presented underneath: Ratio analysis: It is the best technique, under this, Dell’s managerial team can compare their own profitability ratios like gross margin, operational margin and net margin with the HP’s profitability performance. With the comparative evaluation, company can find out their sales as well as cost performance and come up with the right strategy for minimizing costs and maximizing total
sales in order to drive greater return (Schipper, Francis and Weil, 2017). Besides this, Dell can also compare its own financial position with the Dell’s financial health through the evaluation of their liquidity position and solvency performance. With the evaluation of it, company can devise right strategies and create right plans for the effective working capital decisions, designing a right capital structure, cash management strategies, negotiating plan with the suppliers and prompt receipts from the debtors as well, as a result, firm can achieve success and overcome financial consequences. ParticularsDell Revenues56940 Gross profit12186 Net profit2372 Gross profit margin21.40% Net profit margin4.17% From the table, it can be seen that Dell’s GPM as well as net profit margin came down from 21.40% to 20.16% and 4.17% to 2.36%. Decreased sales performance by 0.56% and higher cost of sale by 1.78% resulted downward movement in its gross profit performance which indicates that Dell generated less return on their sales. In contrast, HP’s GP ratio goes up from 23.08% to 23.88% by 3.47%. Although, currently, its revenues came down by 0.75% still, controlled cost of goods sold drive favourable improvement in its gross profit by 2.69%. In comparison, HP’s profit ratio is higher which indicates that it has performed better in relation to the Dell. Further, Dell Inc’s net profit ratio dropped from 4.17% to 2.36% by 43.23% due to overspending on sales, general and administration expenditures & R&D operations. However, in contrast, HP’s ratio shows a slightly decline from 4.55% to 4.50% by 1.21%. It is due to the tighten supervision and monitoring by the manager over the daily functions and formal course of activities (Simons, 2013). The ratios clearly demonstrates that HP has performed well in comparison to the Dell Inc. From the analysis, it is considered advisable to Dell to make strategies in relation with bringing significant improvement in their sales performance & curtail costs to maximize profitability (Banerjee and Das, 2017). Moreover, strong supervision by the managerial team will facilitates firm to enhance their net return and maximize operational performance for driving competitive success. 1.CONCLUSION
The above project report summarized that Dell’s managers can integrate the management accounting system i.e. cost accounting system, inventory management system, job costing system and business decisions. With the help of generating such reports, they can streamline their regular functionality and attain targets easily. Besides this, a clear differentiation has been presented in marginal & absorption costing, under which, it has been discussed that marginal costing use only the variable costs whereas absorption gives value to both the fixed & variable costs. This is the reason why inventory has been valued differently under both the methods and drive distinguish amount of net return. Further, variance analysis reported favourable MPV and adverse MQV which may be caused due to ineffective utilization of PVC sheets and wastage as well upon which, production division manager needs to put better monitoring & control. Apart from this, from the budgetary analysis, activity based budgeting has been considered as the best way because it allocates revenue generated from an activity to its related item of expenditures. 1.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
2.REFERENCES Books and Journals Banerjee, B. and Das, U., 2017. Cost Accounting Standard-Setting in India.The MA Journal. 52(2). pp.85-94. Bhimani, A. and et.al., 2013.Introduction to Management Accounting. Pearson Higher Ed. Choi, N. G., Kulick, D.B. and Mayer, J., 2009. Financial exploitation of elders: Analysis of risk factors based on county adult protective services data.Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 10(3-4). pp.39-62. Fullerton, R.R., Kennedy, F.A. and Widener, S.K., 2013. Management accounting and control practices in a lean manufacturing environment.Accounting, Organizations and Society. 38(1). pp.50-71. Kaplan, R. S. and Atkinson, A. A., 2015.Advanced management accounting. PHI Learning. Mauro, S.G., Cinquini, L. and Grossi, G., 2016. Insights into performance-based budgeting in the public sector: a literature review and a research agenda.Public Management Review.10(2). pp.1-21. Renz, D. O., 2016.The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management. John Wiley & Sons. Saladrigues, R. and Tena, A., 2017. Cost accounting in Spanish and Catalan universities: Its current status of implementation.Intangible Capital.13(1). pp.117-146. Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D. and Zvezdov, D., 2013. Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review.Meditari Accountancy Research.21(1). pp.4-31. Schipper, K., Francis, J. and Weil, R., 2017.Financial Accounting: Introduction to Concepts, Methods and Uses. Cengage Learning. Sehgal, J.K., 2017. Zero-Based Budgeting.PARIPEX-Indian Journal of Research. 5(10). pp.15-38. Simons, R., 2013.Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy Text and Cases: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed. Yigitbasioglu, O., 2017. Drivers of management accounting adaptability: The agility lens.Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. Online Priceoptimization.2015.[Online].Availablethrough:
https://www.manthan.com/cpg-solutions/insights/505-key-factors-to-consider-in-price- optimization-1. [Accessed on 18th April 2017]. Romano,C.,2015.Benefitsofcomputerbasedaccounting.[Online]. <http://www.cleveraccounting.com/9-advantages-computerized-accounting/>. [Accessed on 18thApril 2017].