logo

Beta Estimation for Risk Premium on the Market Portfolio

11 Pages705 Words213 Views
   

Added on  2021-05-27

About This Document

Regression model using Microsoft data rp_ms = 0.006 + 1.319rp_mkt Standard Error 0.008 0.161 R2 = 0.34 2. To test the null hypothesis that j = 0 for the Microsoft stock, the following hypothesis was developed: Ho: j = 0 H1: j 0 The hypothesis was tested using Wald test. On the other hand, to test the null hypothesis that j = 0 for the Microsoft stock

Beta Estimation for Risk Premium on the Market Portfolio

   Added on 2021-05-27

ShareRelated Documents
Running Header: ECONOMETRICS1ECONOMETRICSStudent's name:Institution:Professor's name:Course code:
Beta Estimation for Risk Premium on the Market Portfolio_1
Econometrics21. Regression model using Microsoft datarp_ms = 0.006 + 1.319rp_mktStandard Error 0.008 0.161R2 = 0.342.The beta estimate for risk premium on the market portfolio is 1.319. The beta suggests that whenall other factors are kept constant, when the market portfolio risk premium increases by a unit, it will result in a 1.319 increase in the Microsoft risk premium. Conversely, the standard error or the market portfolio risk premium is 0.161. Thus, the standard error suggests that the mean data points distance from the line fitted is about 0.161.3.To test the null hypothesis that αj = 0 for the Microsoft stock, the following hypothesis was developed:Ho: αj = 0H1: αj ≠ 0The hypothesis was tested using Wald test.The decision is not to reject the null hypothesis since Wald p-values of t-statistic, F-statistic, and Chi-square are greater than 0.00. Thus, αj for a security j under market efficiency is equal to 0 (Schwert, 2003). However, the linear restrictions are identical since F-statistics and the Chi-square value are the same.
Beta Estimation for Risk Premium on the Market Portfolio_2
Econometrics34.On the other hand, to test the null hypothesis that βj = 0 for the Microsoft stock, the following hypothesis was developed:Ho: βj = 0H1: βj ≠ 0The Wald Test was utilized.The decision derived is to reject the null hypothesis since probability values of t-statistics, F-statistic, and Chi-square are all 0.00. Thus, βj for a security j under market efficiency is not equalto 0. However, the linear restrictions are identical since F-statistics and the Chi-square value are the same.5. To evaluate the claim that the tech stocks typically have a high beta value, a confidence interval was used (Altman & Bland, 2011). From the results, it was seen that at 90% confidence interval the beta ranged from 1.05 to 1.59. On the other hand, at 95% confidence interval, the beta rangedfrom 1.0008 to 1.6371. Thus, the tech stock typically has a high beta value (β > 1).6. From the regression model, the R2 was 0.34. The R2 for the regression means that the model explains 34% of the response data around its mean.7.
Beta Estimation for Risk Premium on the Market Portfolio_3
Econometrics4Risk free rate for December 2008: 0.000025Market return as at December 2008: 0.21482Market return as at January 2009 = 0.21482 * 1.01 = 0.216968Regression model: rp_ms = 0.006 + 1.319rp_mkt Thus, predicted Microsoft return = 0.006 + 1.319*0.216968= 0.2921818. a)Regression model using GErp_ge = -0.001 + 0.899rp_mktStandard Errors 0.005 0.099R2 = 0.39b)Regression model using GMrp_gm = -0.0116 + 1.261rp_mktStandard Errors 0.010 0.202R2 = 0.23c)Regression model using IBMrp_ibm = 0059 + 1.1882rp_mktStandard Errors 0.006 0.126R2 = 0.40d)Regression model using Disneyrp_disney = -0.0011 + 0.8978rp_mkt Standard Errors 0.006 0.124
Beta Estimation for Risk Premium on the Market Portfolio_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Report on Econometrics of Microsoft
|11
|705
|106

Estimation and Testing of Capital Asset Pricing Model Assignment
|12
|1900
|98

SPSS: Hypotheses, Central Tendency, Effect Size, Regression Analysis, Chi Square Calculation
|7
|937
|52

Applied Econometrics - Heteroskedasticity in Statistics
|6
|506
|208

Probability of Chi Square Statistics
|17
|3311
|188

Testing the CAPM Theory Using Time Series Regression Analysis
|18
|3072
|254