Ask a question from expert
Assignment on Evidence Based Practice Nursing
7 Pages1846 Words221 Views
Added on 2020-05-28
Assignment on Evidence Based Practice Nursing
Added on 2020-05-28
BookmarkShareRelated Documents
Running Head: COMPETING SOURCE OF EVIDENCE 1Competing Source of Evidence
Competing Source of Evidence 2Critical thinking is an intellectual discipline, which analyzes different data sources to form an objective analysis of the facts (Lau, 2011). There are several terms associated with critical thinking such as rational and unbiased analysis from the factual evidence. Critical thinking is an important asset in the rational analysis and thinking. A person equipped with rational thinking can take right decisions (Tittle, 2011). It is also important to develop critical thinking can case of dilemma and complex decision-making. Critical thinking gives an individual power to take the right decision and examine complex issues. It is also an important asset for the researchers and contributes in increasing the reliability and validity of the data. In academic research, there are several instances when the researcher encounters conflicting sourcesof data. In such cases, it is important to have critical thinking ability to distinguish conflicting data sources (Padget, 2012). The present essay will discuss the importance of critical thinking ability in analyzing contrasting data sources. The essay will also shed light on the strategies and methods, which can be used to prevent these problems.The research is a complex phenomenon in which the researcher has to conduct different activities pertaining to the accomplishment of research. In all these activities, the researcher encounters different information; therefore, it is important to adopt critical thinking for the careful acquisition and the interpretation of the information. In academic activities, critical thinking is an important element in all professional fields and academic disciplines. Critical thinking refers to the careful attainment and interpretation of the information so that the researcher can arrive at a well-defined conclusion. Critical thinking is applicable to any case; however, there are various forms of critical thinking. It is the process of questioning, evaluating, reconstructing, and challenging the established theory and practice (Padget, 2012). Such practice
Competing Source of Evidence 3can result in the formation of new theories and paradigms. It is very important in research. Critical thinking is the only manner to decide whether an information is true or false. It is the way to conclude the viability of the research. In research process, a researcher may encounter sources with conflicting views and approaches. In this scenario, it is important for the researcher to use the critical thinking ability to analyze theviability and the reliability of different resources. In such situations, the researcher must focus onthe viability and the authenticity of the resource (Braun & Clarke, 2013). Blogs and Wikipedia are not considered as the authentic resources as they can be written and edited by anyone. Moreover, they represent the personal opinions of the authors, which may be biased or false. While encountering conflicting sources, the researcher will encounter the dilemma whether first source is true or the second source is true. If both the sources are included in the research, it will yield contrary results. Moreover, it is important to analyze authenticity of the resources before including them in the research as it can obstruct the authenticity of the research. Therefore, when the researcher encounters conflicting resources, they should examine the authenticity of the resources. In order to analyze the authenticity of the sources, the credibility of the resource must be examined. Peer-reviewed research articles and articles published in journal articles have high credibility as the authenticity of the information is examined by several authors. The information published in these articles is authentic and have high credibility. They can be used as authentic resource of information (McDonald, Bammer & Deane, 2009). Competing data and competing hypothesis also occurs when, the researcher tries to explain a social phenomenon with the observed data. It is a challenging issue and assist the researcher in
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Methodology in Historical Research 2022lg...
|5
|1139
|19
Proactive Learner Critical Thinkinglg...
|12
|1321
|73
Academic Skills and Studying with Confidencelg...
|6
|1305
|57
Critical Thinking and Managerial Decision Makinglg...
|8
|2209
|77
Academic Skills and Studying with Confidencelg...
|6
|1398
|34
Importance of Credible Sources in Academic Research and Writinglg...
|7
|2033
|128