TAXATION LAW Question 1; Employment income is what an Australian resident or non-resident individual earns as salary or wage for the period he has worked for. Income tax, on the other hand, is what has been earned for tax purpose Hoopes (2018.Pg 24.) This question requires us to calculate the tax payable for individual using the Australian tax brackets available as well as the relevant tax methods available for respective items. We are further informed not to bother with the 2% medical levy that all employees are entitled to. (a)Tax payable for individual earning an income of 15000 as at 30th June 2018, this tasks us to apply 2017/2018 bracket rates as shown below; Taxable IncomeTax on this income 0-$182000Nil $18201-$3700019c for each $1 over $18200 $37001-$87000$3572 plus 32.5c for each $1 over $37000 $87001-$180000$19,822 plus 37c for each $1 over $87000 $180000 and over$54,232 plus 45c for each $1 over $180000 From the above analysis, this income of 15000 dollars falls in the first bracket of between 0 and 18200 dollars that has nil figure to be subjected thus no taxable pay is to be paid or calculated on this thus the taxable pay is zero. (b)Non-resident is a foreign resident who works in Australia he is eligible to pay tax but of course, at a base rate different from that of the resident, for instance, there is no exemption to low earners however much you earn it is subjected to tax. This is the bracket rate applicable; Taxable incomeTax on this income 0-$8700032.5c for each $1 $87001-180000$28275 plus 37c for each $1 over $87000
TAXATION LAW $180001 and over$62,685 plus 45c for each $1 over 180000 From this the non-resident is expected to pay the tax of; =15000*32.5/100=$4875, tax payable thus is $4875 (c)Companies income are taxed at the corporate tax rate of 30% or 27.5$ in case it falls under the minimum base rate of turnover less than 25million dollars. This is income of 15000 dollars is less than the minimum base rate thus qualifies for this hence the tax payable is; =15000*27.5%=$4125, tax payable=$4125 (d)Here we will use the bracket for resident citizen for tax purposes here below; Taxable IncomeTax on this income $87001-$180000$19,822 plus 37c for each $1 over $87000 The base =19200 =155000-87000=68000*0.37=25160 is what is to be taxed plus the base thus tax payable is; =19200+25160=$44360 (e)For non-resident we use bracket; Taxable IncomeTax on this income $87001-180000$28275 plus 37c for each $1 over $87000 =155000-87000=68000 =68000*0.37=25160 Tax payable=25160+28275=$53435 (f) 155000 dollars for a company is still in the bracket lower than the threshold of less than 25million hence the tax payable is; =155000*27.5%=42625dollars is the tax payable. (g) The individual resident with the income of 255000, we use the bracket, Taxable IncomeTax on this income
TAXATION LAW $180000 and over$54,232 plus 45c for each $1 over $180000 This amount is more than 180000, hence=255000-180000=75000 Thus the tax=75000*0.45=33750 Total tax payable=33750+54232=87982 (h)For non-resident, we use the bracket, Taxable IncomeTax on this income $180001 and over$62,685 plus 45c for each $1 over 180000 Thus 255000-180000=75000*0.45=33750 Hence total tax payable=33750+62685=$96435 (i)For a company, it is still at the base of fewer turnovers of 25m Hence=255000*27.5 Tax payable=255000*0.275=$70125 (j)Since this small business entity has the turnover less than the threshold of 10m hence the tax payable=100*0.275=$27.5 Question 2; (a)This Australian resident with an income of 18000 is exempted for both the medical levy and medical levy surcharge because his income is less than 21655 for both medical levy surcharge and medical levy, hence pays zero medical levies and surcharge (b)For senior tax offset, this resident is too not eligible to pay medical levy and surcharge because his income of 32000 is less than the threshold of 34244 for seniors and similarly it is lower than 90000 for minimum medical levy surcharge hence medical levy is zero and surcharge is zero too.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
TAXATION LAW (c)In this case, this resident is more than 40years the minimum age for seniors hence is deemed to be a senior. His income of 45000 is more than the base of 42805, hence the medical levy payable=45000, hence medical levy is=45000*2%=$900 for the medical levy but for surcharge is zero. (d)As long as this foreign resident do not have dependent he indeed not eligible to pay any medical levy or surcharge at all as stipulated by Australian Tax Office and referenced by Thomas(2012.Pg 275.) (e)For a company earning that income, it is not eligible to pay either medical levy or surcharge since this is only applicable to individual employees who are to be the benefit of the same in case of any health emergency. (f)This is a senior pension whose tax is more than the threshold hence his income is subjected to 2% of 110000=$2200,this, therefore, is the medical levy that he is to pay for medical levy surcharge is not entitled to pay because he is holding a private health insurance Duckett(2017.Pg 4.) (g)As the one in case (f) he is going to pay 2% of 110000 medical levy fee=22000 but this time around he pays medical levy surcharge since he does not hold any private medical insurance, Sowa (2018.Pg .35) his income lies in the tier of between 105001-1400000 dollars hence subjection to 1.25%, thus the medical levy surcharge=110000*1.25%=$1375 (h)In this case, the medical levy is 2% of 150000=3000 but for a surcharge, it is only possible for the 9months he did not have that private hospital hence’ Medical levy surcharges lay in tire 3 of 1.5% thus the medical surcharge=1.5%*150000*9/12=$1687.5 (i)From this the medical levy is on the sum of the two income, Hajizadeh (2014.Pg 300) i.e. =110000+75000=185000
TAXATION LAW Hence medical levy=185000*2%=$3700, for medical levy surcharge it is attire 1% thus the medical levy surcharge=1%*185000=$1850 (j)Going with the base tier of $180000 or less an addition of (=1500*3) is increased for each medical levy surcharge after the first child hence pushing the income amount from the base tier to the 1st tier where subjection of 1% is imposed. All the above items in question 1&2 ideally depends with the position of the payee Morini (2018.Pg 990) i.e. whether he or she is a resident or non-resident and if so do they qualify and certify the minimum expected threshold on turnover, income, age matter, dependency level as well as any other outlined base tier enshrined for qualification Aziz (2018.Pg .8) Question 3; Assuming Rob is an Australian resident thus the need to calculate first the taxable income for Rob; Rob Taxable Income For the Year End 30th June 2018 $ Salary32000 Add other income Bank interest150 Total income32150 Less other allowable deductions for special work clothing(450) Total Taxable Income31700 This taxable income is what now is subjected to the taxation bracket. However, there are two factors that are to be factored in after tax. This is the Pay As You Go which is the tax at source has to be netted off from the tax payable this is likewise applicable to interest from the bank
TAXATION LAW where the bank has withheld 45% thus the 150 represent 55% thus need to calculate the full amount 150*45/55=122. Therefore the taxable income is 31700, using this’ Taxable IncomeTax on this income $18201-$3700019c for each $1 over $18200 =31700-18200=13500, thus, therefore, is what is to be subjected to =13500*0.19=2565 is the tax payable. However, there are three factors that should be settled off and add on this, the taxable income qualify for the medical levy but not surcharge, therefore; =2%*31700=634=medical levy, then there is the need to factor in the aspect of bank interest 45% withheld thus need to add tax payable plus medical levy plus the bank interest withheld so as to get what is payable ; Tax Payable=Tax Amount +Medical Levy -Bank Interest with Held- PAYG =2565 + 634 -122-2600=$477, We have factored these items because they were withheld at source at first especially on pay as you go thus the need to net it off so as to curb the issue of double taxation or rather tax cascade. I have also assumed that the deduction on special working cloth is expense relating to the work Rob does thus the reason as to why I have accounted for as allowable deduction Australian tax office requires that medical levy and medical levy surcharge be included in the amount of tax payable this is the reason I have included it. Question 4; Raphael is an Australian resident for tax purposes hence he is entitled and obliges to comply with the regulation of Australian Tax Office while filing the tax return as well as paying the same. Raphael’s gross income is $68000 thus from this we can calculate medical levy to be= 2% of 68000=1360 Australian Dollars,
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
TAXATION LAW Dividends in Raphael case is mixed up hence the need to account for them separately, for instance, the; Unranked dividends the amount of dividend to be paid free Coulton(2014.Pg 1330)from tax while the franked dividend is that amount being paid with tax amount on it. On the other hand imputation, frank credit is the final amount of tax paid to the Australian Tax Department. Income Declared=unranked dividend +franked dividend +imputation frank credit Franked DividendUnfrankedImputation Frank Credit 120000=2000*30/70=857.14 21000=0 3900600=900*30/70=385.7 Dividend income declared McLaren .Pg. 141) =2000+1000+1500+857.14+385.7=5742.84 Australia dollars Tax liability on dividend to be=5742.84*30%=1722.852 Australian Dollars Tax owed=1722.852-385.7-857.14=480.012 Australian Dollars, therefore with this tax on dividend and medical levy for Raphael we can now calculate his tax from the income using the tax brackets available for year 2017/2018. Since Raphael has a gross income of 68000 Australian dollars he qualifies in the 3rd bracket of; Taxable IncomeTax on this income $37001-$87000$3572 plus 32.5c for each $1 over $37000 Therefore; =68000-37000=31000, hence is=31000*0.325=10075 Australian Dollars thus the tax payable from the gross income= =10075+3572=13647 thus with this we need to factor in the tax at source deducted i.e. Pay As You Go;
TAXATION LAW Taxable Gross Tax=13647 Less Pay As You Go= (15100) Tax Refund/Payable= (1453) Add Medical Levy1360 Add tax value on dividend480.02 Gross tax payable=387.02 Australian Dollars. Australian Tax Office now expects to see all the disclosure of both full and partial frank and unfrank dividend during the filing of return Grubert (2016.Pg 14) as well as in the dividend distribution statement form. The tax rate used for calculating these dividends is the corporate rate of 30%.
TAXATION LAW References; Aziz, O., Gibbons, M., Ball, C. and Gorman, E., 2018. The effect on household income of government taxation and expenditure in 1988, 1998, 2007 and 2010.Policy Quarterly,8(1). Coulton, J.J., Ruddock, C. and Taylor, S.L., 2014. The informativeness of dividends and associated tax credits.Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,41(9-10), pp.1309-1336. Duckett, S., Moran, G. and Danks, L., 2017. Making health care more affordable and effective for both taxpayers and patients: Grattan Institute submission to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee inquiry into the value and affordability of private health insurance and outof-pocket medical costs. Grubert, H. and Altshuler, R., 2016. Shifting the burden of taxation from the corporate to the personal level and getting the corporate tax rate down to 15 percent. Hajizadeh, M., Connelly, L.B. and Butler, J.R.G., 2014. Health policy and equity of health care financing in Australia: 1973–2010.Review of Income and Wealth,60(2), pp.298-322. Hoopes, J.L., Robinson, L. and Slemrod, J., 2018.Public tax-return disclosure(No. w24318). National Bureau of Economic Research. McLaren, J. and Cormick, R., 2018. Dividend imputation: a critical review of the future of the system. InAustralian Tax Forum(Vol. 33, No. 1, p. 141). Tax Institute. Morini, M. and Pellegrino, S., 2018. Personal income tax reforms: A genetic algorithm approach. European Journal of Operational Research,264(3), pp.994-1004. Sowa, P.M., Kault, S., Byrnes, J., Ng, S.K., Comans, T. and Scuffham, P.A., 2018. Private health insurance incentives in Australia: in search of cost-effective adjustments.Applied health economics and health policy,16(1), pp.31-41.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
TAXATION LAW Thomas, P.E., 2012. Reflections on the role of less-than-comprehensive (exclusionary) private health insurance hospital products in the Australian healthcare system.Australian Health Review,36(3), pp.273-276.