This assignment template provides an overview of key features of assessment, the importance of involving learners and others in the assessment process, different assessment methods, and the role of constructive feedback in the assessment process.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Assignment template – Unit 305 Name of candidateDate of submission The assignment will be gradedPASS (P)orREFER (R). Question 1 – Explain the key features of the following: Initial assessment This type of assessment used before or at beginning of a programme to explore the learners to recognise any specific aspects which might otherwise go ignored. Learner may also get additional support while requiring following the assessment1. Formative assessment This type of assessment used continually throughout the course and also can be taken out informally to review development of learners1. This assessment type can be attained in a remarkable way to the learner by having them contributing to undertakings, quizzes or particular tasks. Once assessment has taken place, the tutor is able to highpoint respective extents that are need of further progress. Summative assessment Summative assessment is related to the participants’ assessment where the focus is on the result of a program. The objective of summative assessment is to measure student learning at the end of an instructional unit by relating it beside a set benchmark or standard2. Question 2a – Explain the importance of involving learners in the assessment process. It is very significant to consider learners during the process assessment as it will benefit them to administer and take possession of their learning. It will make them think about what they have attained and propose ahead. Furthermore, it will 1J. Alleman, ‘Authentic Assesment In Social Studies’.HSSE, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, pp.7-26. 2.Black., and D, Wiliam, ‘Developing the theory of formative assessment.Educational Assessment’, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), vol. 21, no. 1, 2009, p. 5.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
help their understanding of the topic and domain and also strengthen their sense of accomplishment. Being a teacher, including learners in the assessment process will also provide the learner prospects to inform their teacher of anything that might impact their development or accomplishment3. Question 2b – Explain the importance of involving others in the assessment process. It is also required to consider others during some stages of assessment progress like a learner might have particular needs and the teacher may require other individual to include in the assessment to coincide with the person requirements. These could comprise of both external and internal individual. External individuals may include social workers, inspectors, supervisors, and career advisors. On the other hand, internal individuals include mentors, assessors and teacher. It is very important to work confidentially and be professional while working with others4. Question 3a – List six assessment methods of your choice. 3G.K. Ding, ‘Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools.Journal of environmental management, vol. 86, no. 3, 2008, pp.451-464 4J.L, Skeem and J, Monahan, ‘Current directions in violence risk assessment.Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 20, no. 1, 2011, pp.38-42.
Level 3 Award in Education and Training 1) Assignments 2) Discussions 3) Case Studies 4) Exam and Tests 5) Group work 6) Peer assessments Question 3b – Briefly describe three assessment methods and give an example of when and how each of them could be used. 1) Exam and Tests -A formal exam is conducted where the learner participates under particular circumstances. 2)Case Studies– Here, learner can discover real-life event and exploit their knowledge in dealing with the event. 3)Discussions– In this, learners can share his/her views with the teacher, maybe on a particular subject5. Question 4 – Pick three assessment methods that are the most appropriate for your subject area and compare their strengths and limitations for meeting individual learner needs. Assessment method 1 – Assignment Strengths Incorporated by the teacher to Limitations All syllabus topics may not be 5P.BaxterandS.Jack,‘Qualitativecasestudymethodology:Studydesignand implementation for novice researchers’.The qualitative report, vol. 13, no. 4, 2008, pp.544-559.
challenge the learnings of learners5.covered if the assignment set by another enterprise. Assessment method 2 – Case Studies Strengths Enhance current experience and knowledge. It also makes subjects matters easier to comprehend by being interesting and realistic6. Limitations It needs to include clear outcomes and also time boundation need to be there. Assessment method 3 - Discussion Strengths Participation can be done by all learners with sharing of various experiences and knowledge. Limitations This assessment may not include quiet or shy learners. Time limit also needs to be set. Question 5 – Pick two assessment methods and explain how they can be adapted to meet individual learner needs. 1) Case Studies -Raise knowledge and motivation of leaners. It can also suit a range of learning preference. 2) Exam/Tests –It matches read/write learning preference and also to learners who can manage up with the formality of test. Considering learner ability and needs it can be differentiated7. 66K.McCusker and S.Gunaydin, ‘Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research’.Perfusion, vol. 30, no. 7, 2015, pp.537-542. 7S.De Freitas and T. Neumannm ‘The use of ‘exploratory learning’for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments’.Computers & Education, vol. 52, no. 2, 2009, pp.343-352.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Level 3 Award in Education and Training Question 6 – Explain the role and use of the following: Self-assessment Own targets and goals are set by learners. Assessment requirements are also considered by the learners. Encouragement of personal responsibility and learner involvement8. Peer assessment To motivate and encourage learners. To keenly include all learners. Recommend improvements considering work of peer. Learners also comprehend the way to provide the feedback ineffective way9. Question 7 – Describe at least six features of constructive feedback. 1)It increases self-awareness. 2)It provide guidance and promotes development. 3)It takes learners both negative and positive feedback on the development of learners. 4)While providing positive feedback, it also praises them for their efforts. 5)It encourages to do better in particular fields10. 8Lamb, M., ‘The motivational dimension of language teaching’.Language Teaching, vol. 50, no. 3, 2017, pp.301-346. 9Nelson, M.M. and Schunn, C.D., ‘The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance’.Instructional Science, vol. 37, no. 4, 2009, pp.375- 401. 10Duffy, K., ‘Providing constructive feedback to students during mentoring’.Nursing Standard (through 2013), vol. 27, no. 31, 2013, p.50.
6)It offers a new perspective for the future. Question 8 – Explain how constructive feedback contributes to the assessment process. With the help of constructive feedback, teachers are able to help the learners understand what they have achieved and learned. Some benefits it includes – Provide opportunities for discussion and clarification. Consider progress elements rather than failure. Encourage confidence and motivation. Recognise further learning opportunities or practice required11. To be more effective, it is important for the feedback to be placed immediately. Question 9 – Explain how to give constructive feedback to learners. Here, critical feedback can be given formally while in writing or informally. This feedback need to give in a constructive manner that comprises of particular facts 11Sibley,J.andParmelee,D.X.,‘Knowledgeisnolongerenough:Enhancing professional education with team‐based learning’.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 2008, no. 116, pp.41-53.
Level 3 Award in Education and Training in relation to achievement and towards the progress of learners growth. While giving feedback orally, it is important for the teacher to consider body language, voice tone, and facial expressions12. It is also important to check that critical feedback should never look like as an evaluation statement like “well done” as it may confuse learners towards future. Question 10 – List sources of information that should be made available to learners and others involved in the assessment process. There are various sources of information such as – The learner requirement Feedback records Assessment plans Task and completion dates Online resources such as websites, textbooks and journals. Assessment procedures and policy13 Question 11 – Explain what assessment records you would keep and why, including the organisational requirements. It is very important for both learners and teachers to keep the records of assessment. Various assessment records that is require to kept throughout the learning programme are - Behaviour issues Plans of learners learning Support records of learners Attendance of learners 12Wiliam, D., ‘What is assessment for learning?’.Studies in educational evaluation,vol. 37, no. 1, 2011, pp.3-14. 13Goldie,J.G.S.,‘Connectivism:Aknowledgelearningtheoryforthedigital age?’.Medical teacher, vol. 38, no. 10, 2016, pp.1064-1069.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Various personal details such as contact details and disabilities Record of what was taught and when14 14Cennamo, L. and Gardner, D., ‘Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit’.Journal of managerial psychology, vol. 23, no. 8, 2008, pp.891-906.
Level 3 Award in Education and Training References Alleman, J., ‘Authentic Assesment In Social Studies’.HSSE, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, pp.7-26. Baxter,P.andJack,S.,‘Qualitativecasestudymethodology:Studydesignand implementation for novice researchers’.The qualitative report, vol. 13, no. 4, 2008, pp.544-559. Black, P. and Wiliam, D., ‘Developing the theory of formative assessment.Educational Assessment’, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), vol. 21, no. 1, 2009, p. 5. Cennamo, L. and Gardner, D., ‘Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit’.Journal of managerial psychology, vol. 23, no. 8, 2008, pp.891-906. De Freitas, S. and Neumann, T., ‘The use of ‘exploratory learning’for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments’.Computers & Education, vol. 52, no. 2, 2009, pp.343-352. Ding,G.K.,‘Sustainableconstruction—Theroleofenvironmentalassessment tools.Journal of environmental management, vol. 86, no. 3, 2008, pp.451-464. Duffy, K., ‘Providing constructive feedback to students during mentoring’.Nursing Standard (through 2013), vol. 27, no. 31, 2013, p.50. Goldie,J.G.S.,‘Connectivism:Aknowledgelearningtheoryforthedigital age?’.Medical teacher, vol. 38, no. 10, 2016, pp.1064-1069. Lamb, M., ‘The motivational dimension of language teaching’.Language Teaching, vol. 50, no. 3, 2017, pp.301-346. McCusker, K. and Gunaydin, S., ‘Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research’.Perfusion, vol. 30, no. 7, 2015, pp.537-542. Nelson, M.M. and Schunn, C.D., ‘The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance’.Instructional Science, vol. 37, no. 4, 2009, pp.375- 401.
Sibley, J. and Parmelee, D.X., ‘Knowledge is no longer enough: Enhancing professional education with team‐based learning’.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 2008, no. 116, pp.41-53. Skeem, J.L. and Monahan, J., ‘Current directions in violence risk assessment.Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 20, no. 1, 2011, pp.38-42. Wiliam, D., ‘What is assessment for learning?’.Studies in educational evaluation,vol. 37, no. 1, 2011, pp.3-14.