Audit, Assurance and Compliance in Webster Limited

The project evaluates the audit, assurance and compliance methods followed in Webster Limited, an Australian agronomy sector company listed amongst the ASX 300 companies. It discusses auditors' independence declaration, non-audit services, auditors' remuneration, role functions of risk and auditor committee and independent auditors' report to the shareholders.

AUDIT, ASSURANCE AND COMPLIANCE

Executive summary
The project attempts to evaluate the audit, assurance and compliance methods followed in the
Webster Limited, which is operating in the Australian agronomy sector and listed amongst the
ASX 300 companies. The independence declaration of the auditor has been discussed.
Moreover, the aspects like Non-Audit services performed by the auditor, auditor’s remuneration,
role functions of risk and auditor committee and the feasibility of independent auditors’ report to
the shareholders have been evaluated. Based on which the final conclusion has been derived.
Page 2 of 21

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................4
2.0 Auditors’ independence declaration..........................................................................................5
3.0 Non-Audit services performed by the Auditor..........................................................................7
4.0 Auditors' Remuneration.............................................................................................................9
5.0 Role, functions and composition of the Audit Committee......................................................10
6.0 Independent Auditors report to the members..........................................................................12
7.0 Key Audit Matters...................................................................................................................13
8.0 Directors’ and Management’s Responsibilities.......................................................................14
9.0 Subsequent Events...................................................................................................................15
10.0 Interested Parties....................................................................................................................16
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................17
References:....................................................................................................................................18
Appendices:...................................................................................................................................19
Page 3 of 21

1.0 Introduction
The responsibilities of an auditor are to review and assess the financial tracks and accounting
methods by examining the compliance of an organisational strategy and analysing the
effectiveness of internal operations. In this aspect, the responsibilities of an auditor also include
assessment of employees’ performances and identifying their progress towards organisational
objectives. In the statement of Tepalagul and Lin (2015), the reports framed by auditors are
considered important in a company as it informs users whether or not companies' statements
were fairly state or manipulative methods are included in it. Audit and assurance are regarded as
the on-site verification action, for instance, examination, reviewing, monitoring of a procedure or
quality system to make sure conformity to prerequisite. According to Christensen et al. (2016),
the foremost purpose of a statutory audit is offering an autonomous feedback to shareholders on
the verge of fairness and truth of its financial statements, whether it has been fairly designed as
per organisational act or abided by the laws or not. The project aims to determine the audit,
assurance and compliance methods followed in the Webster Limited, which has its operation in
the agronomy sector and listed amongst the ASX 300 companies. The evaluation would be
conducted based on the details highlighted in the company’s annual report. Depending on which
the final conclusion would be derived.
Page 4 of 21

2.0 Auditors’ independence declaration
As per the consideration of Tepalagul and Lin (2015), independence declaration of an auditor
necessitates for certain integrity an objective-based approach to the auditing procedure. The
specific task requires an auditor to conduct or carry out its accountabilities in a free manner and
in an objective manner. However, it can be stated that the independence of an auditor also
represents independence from parties whose perception, estimations and interests can be harmed
by the audit results. In the case of this company, Webster Limited, information gathered from the
annual reports underscores the fact that the auditor has managed to conduct an independent
declaration in its audit process. As per the annual report, the audio has framed the audit reports
as per the alliance of section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, which the company abides
(Annualreports.com., 2018).
The auditor has managed to scrutinise the audit function thoroughly and framed the financial
audit statement of Webster Limited for its fifteen months period, which ended on 30th September
2017. The auditor using his experience and knowledge in its field has found not such
contraventions in the internal system and account related methods. It has been identified that the
auditing and assurance methods are designed with a loyal and true view of the company’
financial position for 30th September 2017 (Annualreports.com., 2018). Thus, the auditing of its
financial performances for the past 15 months period has been conducted in a wide manner,
which highlights the integrity and uprightness approach of the auditor. Hence, the independence
declaration of the auditor in the case of the chosen company has been wise and true. As per the
chosen sources, the audit reports have also been conducted by following the laws of Australian
Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations of 2001. Moreover, the auditors also
Page 5 of 21

claimed the fact in the annual reports stating that the provided independence declaration utterly
mitigates the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, which has also been given to the
organisational directors as well. Hence, the audit reports presented in the Webster Limited’s
annual reports is strongly feasible and reliable. Hence, the audit evidence obtained from the
annual report, 2017 is adequate and accurate to offer a basis for one's opinion.
Page 6 of 21

3.0 Non-Audit services performed by the Auditor
As per the statement of Bell et al. (2015), non-audit services are the not included in the audit
system of an organization's financial statements. It represents any sort of professional services
offered by any of the issuers by a listed accounting firm, rather than the ones offered to issues
associated with a review or audit of the issuers' financial statements. It has been assessed from
the chosen company’s annual reports that the director has shown a sigh of satisfaction and relief
by the not-audit service standards performed by the auditor of Webster Limited. It has been
identified that the non-audit service lines of the company of the current year are strongly
compatible with the generic standards of auditor' independence compel led by the Corporations
Act 2001. The amount details payable or paid to the auditor for the provision of its non-audit
service lines during the 15 months period are thoroughly and effectively outline in the financial
statements records of note 4. As per the chosen sources, it has been assessed that the directors of
the organization carried the opinions that the non-audit service lines revealed in the note 4
standards of financial statement merely compromise the independence of an external auditor, as
per the claims of the Risk and Audit Committee (Annualreports.com., 2018).
The committee has placed the opinions that the entire non-audit service lines had been examined
and commended to make sure that it does not create any impact on the objective and integrity
sides of the auditor. Moreover, it has also claimed by the Risk handling and auditing committee
that none of the non-auditing services tends to undermine the usually followed principles
connecting to the auditor’s independence declaration methods as designed in the ‘Code of
Conduct APES 110 Code Of Ethics’ framed by the Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards
Board. That also involves the activities like monitoring and reviewing the auditor's individual
Page 7 of 21

works, decision-making capabilities for the company, acting in a management, sharing economic
rewards and risk in a joint manner and acting like an advocate for the company. Henceforth, it
can be determined from the previous statements that the non-audit service lines of the company
have been conducted in a professional manner and objectively, which never come between or
hampered the auditor's independence declaration process or affected his integrity to frame the
financial report for 30th September 2017 in a trustworthy manner.
Page 8 of 21

4.0 Auditors’ remuneration
The remuneration of the auditor for the company has been increasing substantially in last two
years. The figure in the appendix below shows that the total remuneration paid to the auditor for
audit, review, taxation and other related services was $492,200 in the year 2016, which increased
to $711,017 in the next year. In other words, the audit and related fees have increased almost
44.46% in the current year. Such an increase is due to the fact that the auditor audited 15 month's
accounts in the year 2017. The financial statements for 2016 have been restated to include audit
fees and review related service fees as well.
Page 9 of 21

5.0 Role, functions and composition of the Audit Committee
Webster Limited board members are considerably supported by its Risk and Audit Committee.
This committee, in general, contains its individual operating and charter methods and helps its
Board in the process of discharging its obligations formed through the review and assessment of
financial records, risk, audit, assurance and compliance. In addition to the latter statement, the
directors of Webster Limited often meet outside in its usual Board and Committee Meetings on
time to time basis, in order to follow the superior corporate governance practices.
The Risk and Audit Committee in the particular organisation reviews the internal direct
strategies and methods designed in order to defend corporation assets and to make sure that the
truthfulness of its financial reporting is retained efficiently. The committee further instructs on
the development and continuance of a structure of in-house controls and suitable moral
principles for the administration of this combined Group. This Committee is in addition
accountable for recognising the areas of noteworthy production threat and guaranteeing
preparations are effectively managed. Both the committees also monitor both the half-yearly and
annual financial statements of the organisation for its definite period before the consideration
process of the Board members. The risk and the audit committee is moreover in charge for
pertaining conformity as per the ASX Listing Rules, Corporations Act 2001 and the other forms
of regulatory abidance with the statutory bodies or external governing.
Information gathered from its 2017, annual reports highlight the further fact that amongst the
allotted accountabilities, the committee tends of advising and assess the Board on the
recommendation and payment of outdoor auditors and its satisfactoriness of present exterior and
interior audit preparations counting the range and excellence of audits methods. It has been noted
Page 10 of 21

that the Audit and Risk Committee Charter is considerably accessible on its corporate website
that also contains valid and noteworthy information regarding the procedures for selecting and
appointing an external auditor. The committee usually meets three times in the fifteenth month
period that ended on 30th September 2017. The existing members of the Risk and Audit
Committee are BD Cushing and C D Langdon, who is the Chairman of the corporation.
Page 11 of 21

6.0 Independent Auditors report to the members
It has been discussed in the previous section that the auditor of this company has been efficient
in retaining its integrity and truthfulness to review the financial records of 2017 without initiating
any form of data tampering or manipulation. Hence, it can be determined that the auditor has
conducted a biased free process in terms of auditor the entire records and people involved
(Annualreports.com. 2018).
Moreover, for the referred time period, the stated goodwill of the company and whether the
financial records justifying the goodwill or not has also been evaluated by the auditors. Using his
understanding and market knowledge, the auditor has used key control methods and valuation
models to gauge whether the Goodwill of Webster has actually been retained or not. Therefore, it
can be stated that the Independent Auditors’ report to the shareholders can be to some extent
reliable as the application of useful and knowledgeable tools are used to derive the audit
findings. Moreover, by testing on a sample basis the auditor has derived the cash flow models of
mathematical accuracy. And the relevant data is passed to the boards based on which the
approval is made.
On the overall, it may be asserted that the audit opinion is unqualified and without any objection.
In other words, the financial statements of the company present a true and fair view of the
resulted of operations and also the position of assets and liabilities of the business.
Page 12 of 21

7.0 Key Audit Matters
The key audit matters which have been identified by the Auditor while conducting the audit
process may briefly be enumerated as below:
For 30th September 2017, the Consolidated Financial Statement of the company involves its
permanent water rights which sum up to a total of $ 212.9 million. In this process, the
management and board's usage of the current market price as its accurate methodology for
estimated recovery amount has also been reviewed. The auditor has applied the tests of controls
to check the internal control function installed in this regard. In addition, the audit team has
challenged the assumptions undertaken by the management in estimating the fair value of the
assets.
Secondly, the company has $23.3 million of goodwill arising out of the agricultural activity as
assets in its balance sheet for 2017. Auditors have been inquisitive with respect to the
presumptions undertaken by the management in evaluating the fair value of the goodwill. Also,
the related impairment has also been checked for its validity in terms of management's
assertions.
Lastly, it may also be noted that the company has changed its accounting policy relating to the
Bearer Plants valuing almost $50.5 million as on 2017 balance sheet date. Being the auditor, the
Deloitte has raised observations as to the management’s methodologies with respect to the
determinations of useful lives of such orchards and also the validity on the expected pattern of
consumption.
Page 13 of 21

8.0 Directors’ and Management’s Responsibilities
The preparation of financial statements is the primary responsibility of the management and
hence the directors may need to ensure a strong and efficient internal control in place so that the
operational part of the book-keeping and accounting may be complete in all respects. However, it
may also be noted that sound corporate governance is also necessary in order to achieve the
corporate goal of fair financial reporting in the most timely and cost-effective manner.
Page 14 of 21

9.0 Subsequent Events
The annual report shows that there is no such subsequent event. Such events may be such that
may have taken place after the balance sheet date but before the finalization of the financial
statements. However, the directors are of the representation that the events that have taken place
during the given time frame may not have a material impact on the books of accounts and hence
have not been accordingly disclosed.
Page 15 of 21

10.0 Interested Parties
Note 21 to the financial statements show that the company does appropriately disclose related
party transactions in their annual reports. Such disclosure mainly consists of compensation of
key management personnel (KMPs) and other transaction with KMPs. A closer look into the
annual report shows that such compensation has been well disclosed along with the all the
transactions made with related parties. The disclosure contains the declaration that all such
transactions have been made at arm's length prices.
Page 16 of 21

Conclusion
The study has arrived at a concluding statement, which underscores the fact that the auditor of
the organization has effectively conducted a sensitivity analysis of its key assumptions and
tallied the assumptions with feasible models and equipment to judge its reliabilities. A perusal of
the annual report for the year 2017 suggests that the information contained therein truly
represents the fair value of the assets and liabilities position of the business. In other words, there
is no material misstatement in the books of accounts that have been identified while performing
the audit work. However, the Audit and Risk Committee may consider the key audit matters as
raised by the auditor in the Annual General Meeting (AGM) as a follow-up question as those are
the areas of management actionable. Finally, it may be concluded that the audit process follows a
systematic approach to check and verify the authenticity of the financial data as contained in the
financial, statement. Auditor attestation places the reliability of the financial, statements on a
much higher a scale. External stakeholders also put much reliance on the audited accounts. In
other words, the independent audit records can be trusted by the third parties or shareholders. In
the given instance, the company has effectively conducted in audit, assurance and compliance
programs, in which the accuracy of data is valid to be relied upon. A well-structured audit plan
along with the strong corporate governance and management perspective towards audit
significantly contribute towards the achievement of the corporate goal of sustainability and long-
term value creation in most efficient manner.
Page 17 of 21

References:
Annualreports.com (2018) [online]. Available at:
http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDF/ASX_WBA_2017.pdf
[Accessed 15 Sep. 2018].
Bell, T.B., Causholli, M. and Knechel, W.R. (2015) Audit firm tenure, non‐audit services, and
internal assessments of audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), pp.461-509.
Christensen, B.E., Glover, S.M., Omer, T.C. and Shelley, M.K. (2016) Understanding audit
quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting
Research, 33(4), pp.1648-1684.
Tepalagul, N. and Lin, L. (2015) Auditor independence and audit quality: A literature
review. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(1), pp.101-121.
Tepalagul, N. and Lin, L. (2015) Auditor independence and audit quality: A literature
review. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(1), pp.101-121.
Page 18 of 21

Appendices:
Figure 1: Details of ELTIP shares granted, 30th Sep 2017
(Source: Annualreports.com., 2018)
Page 19 of 21

Figure 2: Company’s five years’ performance
(Source: Annualreports.com., 2018)
Page 20 of 21

Figure 3: Remuneration of Auditors
(Source: Annualreports.com., 2018)
Page 21 of 21