This article discusses the ethical issues related to auditing and provides alternatives to deal with them. The stakeholders, major principles, and consequences of each alternative are also discussed.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: AUDITING Auditing Name of the Student Name of the University Author’s Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1AUDITING American Accounting Association (AAA) ApplicationDescription 1.Determinationofthe facts As per the given situation it needs to be seen that Janice Roberts notices certain irregularities with the requisitioning of the cheques in which the sequence of the payee is an unknown entity. Despite of this, the various types of the supporting documentations are seen to be in favor of the requisitions made for the cheques (George, Jones & Harvey, 2014). 2.Identificationofthe stakeholders The main stakeholders of the model are further listed as followed: Accountant for the large company- Janice Roberts The chief financial officer for the large company- Brett Andrews Assistant of Accountant for the large company- Audrey Miller General manager of the large company (Trung, 2015) 3.Definingtheethical issues The main ethical issues with the company needs to be determined as per irregularities with the requisitioning of the cheque and cases where the numbers are of the sequence and entity of the payee is unknown. Despite of this, various types of supporting documentation of the requisitioning were attached. It needs to be further inferred that other concerns with the auditing are seen to be based on the number of other issues pertaining to the concerns associated to GM and CFO stealing of large sums of money fromPetPlusLimitedfortheirpersonaluse(Kothari,Mizik& Roychowdhury, 2015). 4.Identificationofthe major principles, rules and values applicable with the The identification of the major principles related to the given case as per APES 110 are measured as per the factors such as Integrity, objectivity, professional competence, confidentiality and professional behavior.In
2AUDITING casethe given case, irregularities with the requisitioning of the cheques needs to be considered as breach of integrity. This is seen to be lacking with the straightforwardness and honesty among the business relationships. The breach of objectivity factor needs to be defined as per the various types of the other considerations which are seen to be based on the overriding professional behavior as per the assurance of not to worry about cheque requisition by Janice but not complying to her statement. The breach of some of the other values pertaining to the given case needs to be also considered relevant with General Manager and CFO stealing of money from Pet Plus. This is directly relevant to the breach of Professional behavior. This relates to the relevant laws and regulations of avoiding any conduct that discreet the profession. This is also seen to be breach of integrity factorwhich willcreate long-termnegative impacton the business (Magee & Zeff, 2016). 5.Specificationand comparisonofthe alternatives The various types of the specification of the alternatives to the given case are listed as follows: 1.ThefirstalternativeisthatJanicemaydecidetostayinthe organization but not react to such ethical issues 2. The second alternative related to this case needs to be identified with Janice deciding to reporting the issues with higher authority. This will lead to reporting of the ethical breached to her immediate supervisor. However, this should not include chief financial officer Brett Andrews and general manager. 3. The various alternative for Janice needs to be seen with directly confronting to the Brett Andrews and general manager and letting them know about the breach of the ethical issues 4. The last alternative is depicted with Janice deciding to leave the job
3AUDITING (Kano et al., 2017). 6.Assessmentofthe consequencesforeach alternative decision option 1.Thefirstalternativeisconsideredastheworstdecisionasthe unscrupulous activities in the business will continue and adversely affect the business in the long run. 2. In the second alternative there is a high possibility of higher authority taking the appropriate measures to curb such issues in the organization. Thisdecisionmakingwillbehighlyconduciveintermsoftaking appropriate step to deal with the ethical decision making. 3. The consequence of the third alternative may lead to even graver consequence for both the organization and Janice herself. The CFO and GM may take use of their high position and terminate Janice due to some false allegations. 4. In case Janice decides to leave her job then also it will serve no good to the company in the long run. As the unethical activities will go untraced and such activities will continue to take place in the organization. 7.Rationalforethical decision making The rationale for going forward with the second measure is due to the fact that alternative there is a high possibility of higher authority taking the appropriate measures to prevent such unethical issues in the organization. Thisdecisionmakingwillbehighlyconduciveintermsoftaking appropriate step to deal with such problems in the long-run (Carey, Monroe & Shailer, 2014).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4AUDITING Reference Carey, P. J., Monroe, G. S., & Shailer, G. (2014). Review of Post‐CLERP 9 Australian Auditor Independence Research.Australian Accounting Review,24(4), 370-380. George, G., Jones, A., & Harvey, J. (2014). Analysis of the language used within codes of ethical conduct.Journal of Academic and Business Ethics,8, 1. Kano, F., Krupenye, C., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017). Submentalizing cannot explain belief-based action anticipation in apes.Trends in cognitive sciences,21(9), 633- 634. Kothari, S. P., Mizik, N., & Roychowdhury, S. (2015). Managing for the moment: The role of earningsmanagementviarealactivitiesversusaccrualsinSEOvaluation.The Accounting Review,91(2), 559-586. Magee,R.P.,&Zeff,S.A.(2016).LawrenceRevsine:InfluentialTeacherand Author.Accounting Horizons,30(4), 517-524. Trung, N. K. (2015). Ethics Education In The University.International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research,4(8), 5-10.