Accounts at Significant Risk in Auditing and Assurance
Verified
Added on 2022/12/20
|6
|1099
|1
AI Summary
This article discusses the accounts at significant risk in auditing and assurance, including goodwill, fair value of financial instruments, and accounting for discontinued operations. It explores the key assertions at risk for each account and provides references for further reading.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: AUDITING AND ASSURANCE Auditing and Assurance Name of the Student Name of the University Author’s Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1AUDITING AND ASSURANCE Table of Contents Accounts at Significant Risk......................................................................................................2 Key Assertions at Risk...............................................................................................................3 References..................................................................................................................................5
2AUDITING AND ASSURANCE Accounts at Significant Risk Goodwill –Note 22 of the 2018 Annual Report of National Australian Bank (NAB) discloses the accounting policies used by the bank for the accounting of Goodwill (nab.com.au 2019). This section states that NAB considers fair value accounting for the measurement of goodwill and the company is needed to follow the principles of AASB 138Intangible Assetsfor the valuation of goodwill. The value of goodwill of NAB in 2018 is $2,863 million that is a huge amount. It needs to be mentioned that the management of NAB has used certain key assumptions as well as judgements in the areas of determination of the fair value of goodwill, recoverable amount of the Cost Generating Units (CGU) and impairment.This account can be at significant risk due to the presence of the above-mentioned key judgments as well as estimates (Johnstone, Gramling and Rittenberg 2013). Fair Value of Financial Instruments –According to Note 20 of the 2018 Annual Report of NAB, financial instruments that NAB holds at fair value include both the derivative assets and liabilities; such as loans and advances, bonds, notes, trading and hedging derivatives, equity instruments, trading instruments and debts instruments (nab.com.au 2019). It can be seen that NAB ha used Level 1 that is quoted market price or Level 2 that is market observable prices for the measurement of financial instruments. The balances of Level 3 of the financial assets and liabilities that are $569 million and $76 million respectively are significantly smaller than the value of Level 1 and Level 2; and the value of assets is nearly similar to the previous year. The presence of two aspects can lead to this; first, the materiality extent of the financial instruments recorded at the fair value; and second, inappropriateness in used judgements as well as involved complexities in the estimation of the fair values of these financial instruments. For this reason, this account can be considered at significant risk (Ruhnke and Schmidt 2014).
3AUDITING AND ASSURANCE Accounting for Discontinued Operations –According to Note 37 of the 2018 Annual Report of NAB, there was demerger of CYBG Group and this is considered as discounted operations. It needs to be mentioned that the bank has to incur a net loss before tax of $411 million from this discontinued operation (nab.com.au 2019). At the same time, it can be seen from the same note that bank has used certain judgments as well as assumptions related to the accounting policy for discontinued operations. This particular account can be considered at significant risk in the presence of two particular reasons; they are the importance of discontinued operations to the banking operations of NAB and the judgments applied related to the determination of probability of discontinued business operations against the relevant accounting standards (Johnstone, Gramling and Rittenberg 2013). Key Assertions at Risk It needs to be mentioned that there are certain assertions involved in the above- discussed accounts at risk and they are discussed below: In case of goodwill, the key assertion at risk is Valuation. According to this assertion, it is needed for the managements of the companies to ensure the appropriate valuation of assets, liabilities and equity (Titera 2013). It can be seen from the above discussion that NAB has used certain key judgments as well as estimates for the determination of the fair value of their goodwill and the presence of these judgements and estimates can create significant risk for the wrong valuation of the bank’s goodwill. In case of the fair value of the financial instruments, two key assertions at risk are Existence and Valuation. The assertion of existence states that the assets, liability and equity must exist at the end of period and the assertion of valuation states that the assets, liabilities and equity have been values in appropriate manner (Mock and Fukukawa 2015). As per the above earlier discussion, the lack of materiality extent in the financial statements and inappropriateness as well as complexity in the used fair
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4AUDITING AND ASSURANCE value judgements and estimates can lead to wring valuation of financial instruments while can contribute towards the doubts in their existence. In case of the accounting for discontinued operations, the key assertions involved in this risk is Occurrence and Accuracy and Valuation. The assertion of occurrence states that transactions and events disclosed in the financial reports have taken place and relevant to the entity; and the assertion of accuracy and valuation states that the transactions, events and other financial aspects have been accurately disclosed at their correct amount (Glover and Prawitt 2014). The applied judgments and estimates by the company can lead these assertions towards risk.
5AUDITING AND ASSURANCE References Glover, S.M. and Prawitt, D.F., 2014. Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum.Current Issues in Auditing,8(2), pp.P1-P10. Johnstone, K., Gramling, A. and Rittenberg, L.E., 2013.Auditing: a risk-based approach to conducting a quality audit. Cengage learning. Mock, T.J. and Fukukawa, H., 2015. Auditors' risk assessments: The effects of elicitation approach and assertion framing.Behavioral Research in Accounting,28(2), pp.75-84. Nab.com.au.2019.ANNUALFINANCIALREPORT2018.[online]Availableat: https://www.nab.com.au/content/dam/nabrwd/documents/reports/corporate/2018-annual- financial-report.pdf [Accessed 2 May 2019]. Ruhnke, K. and Schmidt, M., 2014. Misstatements in financial statements: The relationship between inherent and control risk factors and audit adjustments.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,33(4), pp.247-269. Titera, W.R., 2013. Updating audit standard—Enabling audit data analysis.Journal of Information Systems,27(1), pp.325-331.