This document provides an analysis of auditing and assurance services in Australia, including discussions on corporate governance, revenue recognition, and accounting information systems. It also examines the responsibilities of auditors and accounting professionals.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES IN AUSTRALIA Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia Name of Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia Table of Contents Answer to Q1.............................................................................................................................2 Answer to Question 2.................................................................................................................4 Answer to question 3..................................................................................................................6 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................9 References................................................................................................................................10
2Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia Answer to Q1. Corporate governance refers to the set of rules, process and system within which a corporation need to function(Tricker, 2015). Good corporate governance means increases the promoter confidence in the business, and thus increases the company chances to raise more funds from the public to do more business. The adoption of the corporate governance vary from the enterprise to enterprise depending upon the size, complexity, nature of the business. The corporate governance of the ASX revolve around the eight central principles, out of which principle 8: remunerate fairly and responsibly has been discussed below as per the question. As per this principles a listed company in order to attract and retain quality director, must have to provide them sufficient remuneration as a motivation factor to align their interest in the company goals and objective(Claessens, & Yurtoglu, 2013). The board of a listed company should have a remuneration committee which should have a)Has at least three member a majority of them should be an independent director, b)The remuneration committee should be chaired by an independent director, c)Disclosure of the committee charter or guidelines, d)Disclosure of the committee member names, e)Disclosure of the number of times the committee meeting was held and the name of the member who have attended the meeting. It is a mandatory requirement for the listed entity to have a systematic and transparent process for the designing the remuneration policy and setting the salary of the director and Non- executive members(McCahery, Sautner & Starks, 2016).
3Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia This is to be noted that the board of the director should not be biased in bringing the matter before the board, in lieu of the remuneration or incentive. The non-executive director should be independent in taking any business decision. The relation between the director remuneration and their performance should be clearly enunciated to the investor. If a company is not having any remuneration committee then.it must disclose the matter in the footnotes of the financial statement, also the company should make a justification about the calculation of the existing remuneration structure. In case if a remuneration committee include executive directors, then the salary of those executive directors should not be decided by them (Khan, Muttakin & Siddiqui 2013). In case of FFA corporate governance, the company is violating the norms of the ASX corporate governance. The violation by the company is listed below- As per the rule the independent directors of the company should not hold more than the 5 % share of the company. Those executive director should be free from the any business relationship that materially affects their independence judgment. In the business of the FFA the Kevin Oliver the Non-Executive directors are holding a share value of 11 % which is against the law and regulation of the company and the same person is holding the position of the executive at the Macquarie bank. On the other hand Jacqueline grace the non-executive director is in the business relationship apart from the FFA business which is the breach in law of the corporate governance. The FFA is also not having any remuneration committee to decide the remuneration of the directors this matters should be disclosed appropriately.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia Answer to Question 2 As per the information provided by the Steve barker on the FFA revenue recognition policy about the revenue generated from the sale of the cattle. As per the Steve barker information, the revenue which has been generated constitute about the 50% of the total revenue from the FFA business (Lawson et al.2013). The answer to this question has been given based on the American accounting association model. 1.Determine the fact. In the given question Steve barker has presented the information, about the revenue recognition principle of the FFA, revenue recognised from the sale of the cattle is not appropriate, revenue earned from the cattle is constitute of about 50% of total revenue FFA business. 2.Define the ethical issue of the case. As per the given case, Audit working paper are the property of the auditor and he should at his discretion provide those working to client. The auditor has the responsibility to include those working paper.it is advisable to the auditor to record and demonstrate the working paper from year to year. The management of the organization cannot refuse an auditor to use the record their finding in the working paper (Khan, Muttakin, & Siddiqui, 2013). 3.Identify the major principle, value and rules. Aspertheaccountingstandard,therevenuefrombusinessshouldbe recognised from it is realized, realizable and earned. If an agriculture product has been classified for sale then the accounting standard says that the business should use
5Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia fair market value approach, rather than the lower of the cost or market. A market basis is acceptable if the product meet the following criteria (Casey, & Grenier, 2014). The product should have an instant marketability at a cited market price that cannot prejudiced by the producer. The product should have the characteristic of unit interchangeability. The product have the relatively negligible cost of disposal. 4.Assess the consequences If the organization follow illegal or unlawful methods of accounting practice then it will not represent the true position of the company business. This will result in making the wrong business decision by the investor. Which will impact the faithful representation of the general public. 5.Make your decision As per the relevant accounting standard, the organization should appropriately recognises the revenue from its business operation from the agriculture. For example the revenue from the agricultural product should be recognised based on the American accounting standard. Further the auditor should be given independence while auditing the financial statement of the enterprise. Independence in auditing is the keystone on which the respect and dignity of a profession is based. Management of the entity should never act like a hindrance in the auditor professional work.
6Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia Answer to question 3 In the given question, TRC is subsidiary company of FFA located in the Western Australia that sells rural and agricultural supply(Ye, M., & Simunic, 2013). TRC is a market giant and is having strong financial position But the company is suffering huge losses from the past two years, so they decided to change their accountinginformationsystem in order to more judiciously managethe inventory sale. This upgrade was taken by the company on 31stmarch 2018. SBF which is the accounting firm of the FFA, due to some reasons could not able to personally send their auditor for financial statement , and arrange a third party accounting professional to review the financial statement of the enterprise. The third party auditor reviewed and evaluated the financial statement of the company provide a positive opinion on the entity financial statement and support the change in the accounting information system of the firm. The parent company named FFA decided to sale the company stake to a company named M.C (Stewart Kent & Routledge,2015).Carron pastoral which is a situated in Western Australia. The deal to sale the TRC was fixed by the parent company FFA for an amount of 44.8 million dollar. On the other hand, later on when the financial statement of the TRC is being audited by auditor of the SBF whose name is Kate Hammod. The auditor reports that the company has suffered a loss on the change in the accounting information system of the enterprise. The loss in the value amounted is $16.6 million in the inventory and the net assets by the equivalent amount.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia As a result of the disclosure of such loss in the value of the net assets and the amount of the inventory, The buyer company McCarran pastoral has withhold the payment of 44.8 million dollar to the company, From the above detailed analysis of the company case, it has been evaluated that the Accounting firm SBF has been in the negligence in their responsibility towards the firm. SBF has been failed in exercising due care in the audit of TRC Duties of an Auditors Professional accountant have a vital responsibility towards the society (Crowther, & Seifi,2018).Investors,tradepayable,employers,andothersectorsofthebusiness community, government and the public at large, rely on the financial accountant or the Auditor for sound financial accounting knowledge and opinion on the financial statement of the enterprise. It is in the interest of the financial auditors to offers an unbiased decision or opinion on the financial statement of the entity. This will result only when a professional accountant is grounded in value and principles. Those principle are important for every professional accountant and auditors which are mentioned below. Integrity: A professional accountant should be straightforward and honest in performing professional services. Objectivity: A professional accountant should be fair and he should not allowed any prejudice or bias, conflict of interest to override its objectivity (Gibson, Limb & Bell, 2014). Professionalcompetenceandduecare:aprofessionalaccountantmustperform professional services with due care, competence, and diligence. The accountant must respect
8Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia the confidentiality of information acquired during the audit. The auditor or the professional accountant should not disclose any such information to the third party without any such specific authority. In the given case of TRC, SBF has appointed a third party as the auditor of the company, who has given a wrong opinion on the financial statement of the TRP. This kind of omission on the part of the auditor is matter of great concern for the whole professional accountant and auditing society. This is because the auditor opinion is considered as great matter for the general investor, because they rely on the auditor opinion in making any investment decision. The SBF before appointing any such third party auditor for their own client. The auditor should consider the professional competence and technical knowledge of the auditor whether he is qualified to give opinion on the financial statement. Therefore it can be said that SBF has failed to apply professional skepticism and due care while expressing their opinion on the financial statement. FFA is guilty of contributory negligence FFA which is parent company of TRC, has surely been in the negligence on their part in applying the faithful representation principle (Casey & Grenier, 2014). On the financial statement of the TRC, the company has been overoptimistic in the company financial performance. The auditor before forming an opinion on the financial statement of the enterprise should do the following task, a)The auditor should ensure that adequate information has been disclosed with regards to annual accounts of the company.
9Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia b)Auditorshoulddeterminethatannualaccountswhicharepreparedbythe management of the organization should convey the real picture of the enterprise assets and liability i.e. it should not conceal any material misstatement. c)Auditor should make a scrutiny of the book of account whether those financial records has been prepared keeping in mind the legal requirement. SBF owes a duty of care to McCarran Pastoral The auditor appointed by the SBF has misrepresented the financial position and financial performance of the TRC, this misrepresentation results in making wrong economic decision of the McCarran pastoral which is the buyer company. The auditor has not given true and fair view of the TRC, therefore there is an increase in the chances of manipulation by the management or the senior position officer (Martinov-Bennie & Mladenovic, 2015). If sale of the TRC stake get finalized on the basis of the material misrepresentation of the enterprise then this would result in the loss of revenue to the purchasing company and loose in the faith of the accountant and auditing professional. But, as it can be seen that only partial payment has been done by the purchasing company to the SBF for the stake in the TRC. Therefore since the decision of the McCarran has been made on the wrong data of the company, therefore the company SBF now owes to return the amount that they have received partially from the purchasing company. Conclusion From the analysis of the above report it can be concluded that financial statement analysis is very important for any stake holder to make investment decision, these investment
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia decision also depends upon the auditor opinion on the financial statement of the entity. Therefore the role of the auditors and accounting professional cannot be denied for their contribution in the auditing and analysis (Apostolou Dull & Schleifer, 2013). Therefore every accounting professional should be honest, sincere and must follow due care in their approach of the auditing.
11Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia References Apostolou, B., Dull, R. B., & Schleifer, L. L. (2013). A framework for the pedagogy of accounting ethics.Accounting Education,22(1), 1-17. Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2015). Corporate governance,incentives,andtaxavoidance.JournalofAccountingand Economics,60(1), 1-17. Casey, R. J., & Grenier, J. H. (2014). Understanding and contributing to the enigma of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance in the United States.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,34(1), 97-130. Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey.Emerging markets review,15, 1-33. Crossler, R. E., Long, J. H., Loraas, T. M., & Trinkle, B. S. (2014). Understanding compliance with bring your own device policies utilizing protection motivation theory: Bridging the intention-behavior gap.Journal of Information Systems,28(1), 209-226. Crowther, D., & Seifi, S. (Eds.). (2018).Redefining Corporate Social Responsibility. Emerald Group Publishing. Edmans, A. (2014). Blockholders and corporate governance.Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ.,6(1), 23-50.
12Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia Esscher, A., Binder-Finnema, P., Bødker, B., Högberg, U., Mulic-Lutvica, A., & Essén, B. (2014). Suboptimal care and maternal mortality among foreign-born women in Sweden:maternaldeathauditwithapplicationofthe‘migrationthreedelays’ model.BMC pregnancy and childbirth,14(1), 141. Gibson, A. R., Limb, J., & Bell, G. (2014). Retrospective audit of unplanned admissions to pediatrichighdependencyandintensivecareaftersurgery.Pediatric Anesthesia,24(4), 372-376. Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy.Journal of business ethics,114(2), 207-223. Lawson, R. A., Blocher, E. J., Brewer, P. C., Cokins, G., Sorensen, J. E., Stout, D. E., ... & Wouters, M. J. (2013). Focusing accounting curricula on students' long-run careers: Recommendations for an integrated competency-based framework for accounting education.Issues in Accounting Education,29(2), 295-317. Lennox, C. S., Wu, X., & Zhang, T. (2014). Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality?.The accounting review,89(5), 1775-1803. Martinov-Bennie, N., & Mladenovic, R. (2015). Investigation of the impact of an ethical frameworkandanintegratedethicseducationonaccountingstudents’ethical sensitivity and judgment.Journal of Business Ethics,127(1), 189-203. McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors.The Journal of Finance,71(6), 2905-2932.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
13Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia Olah, M. E., Gaisano, G., & Hwang, S. W. (2013). The effect of socioeconomic status on access to primary care: an audit study.Cmaj,185(6), E263-E269. Ps, R., Verma, S., Rai, L., Kumar, P., Pai, M. V., & Shetty, J. (2013). “Near miss” obstetric eventsandmaternaldeathsinatertiarycarehospital:anaudit.Journalof pregnancy,2013. Sari, C., & Sari, C. (2015).Faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit auditor independenpadaKantorAkuntanPublik(KAP)diJawaTengah(Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS STIKUBANK). Stewart, J., Kent, P., & Routledge, J. (2015). The association between audit partner rotation and audit fees: Empirical evidence from the Australian market.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,35(1), 181-197. Tricker,B.(2015).Corporategovernance:Principles,policies,andpractices.Oxford University Press, USA. Ye,M.,&Simunic,D.A.(2013).Theeconomicsofsettingauditing standards.Contemporary Accounting Research,30(3), 1191-1215.