Auditing and Assurance Services: Compliance with APES Standards
Verified
Added on 2023/06/10
|9
|1508
|141
AI Summary
This article discusses the importance of complying with APES standards while conducting audit operations. It covers various principles of auditing ethics and their violation, along with the creation of audit independence threats. The article also provides solutions to avoid such threats.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES Auditing and Assurance Services Name of the Student Name of the University Author’s Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES Introduction Auditing refers to the process to examine and inspect the financial statements of the business entities in order to make sure that they are free from material misstatements. At the time of conducting the audit operations, it is the obligation on the auditors to comply with the ethical principles of auditing in order to avoid the violation of audit ethics and audit independence. Question 1 Requirement A The auditing principleAPES 110, Section 260, Gifts and Hospitalitystates there can be the potential violation of the fundamental principles of auditing ethics in case the audit clients offer the auditors with any gift, monetary offers or hospitality (apesb.org.au 2018). More specifically, threat to audit objectivity will be created in case the auditors accept the offers or gifts or hospitality from the clients. Thus, as per this principle of APES, it is the obligation on Jenny Wang of not accepting the specific offers from Panania Cars Pty Ltd as there will be the creation of the auditObjectivitythreat in case she accepts the offer (William Jr, Glover and Prawitt 2016). Requirement B According toAPES 110, Section 260, Gifts and Hospitality, there will be the treat to non-compliance with the ethical principles of auditing if the auditors accept any financial or non- financial gift from the clients as this situation can end up in the creation of self-interest threat to audit objectivity (apesb.org.au 2018). Thus, the auditors are required to analyze the level of this threat. In light of the above-discussed principle of APES, Katrina Wearne has the obligation of
3AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES not accepting the gift of $350 worth cosmetics from the audit client as this aspect can contribute to breaching of auditObjectivityprinciples (Eilifsenet al.2013). Requirement C The principle ofAPES 110, Section 130, Professional Competence and Due Care makes it necessary for the audit professionals to have the needed professional skill and knowledge to perform the audit operations for their clients (apesb.org.au 2018). Thus, the requirement for the auditors is to act diligently by complying with the professional and technical auditing standards. In the light of this specific audit principle of APES, D. Marron had to have the required knowledge and skill to carry out the review program. In addition, he does not have the right to permit the installation program in the absence of proper review. Thus, this situation violates the principle ofProfessional Competence and Due Care(Chandler 2014). Requirement D Quality assurance review is an important step in the audit profession that involves in measuring various dimensions of the audit practice for enhancing the audit quality. In the provided situation, the main aim of the review of the audit papers is the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the respective audit practices. Thus, it can be understood that the main aim of this review program is the betterment of the audit profession. Hence, in the light of the above discussion, it can be concluded that no ethical principle of auditing is violated with this review program (Leunget al.2014). Requirement E As perAPES 110, Section 290.156, Provision of Non-assurance Services to Audit Clients, the audit professionals are barred from providing any non-assurance services to the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES clients due to the violation of audit independence principle (apesb.org.au 2018). In addition, as perAPES 110, Section 140, Confidentiality, the audit professionals are restricted to disclose any confidential business information of the client to any third party without their permission. In the lights of the above-discussed principles, Bill Holland violates the principle ofProvision of Non- assurance Services to Audit Clientsby taking the advise of Taylor. He also violates the Confidentialityprinciple by sharing the information of the clients with Taylor (Messier, Glover and Prawitt 2015). Requirement F The principle ofAPES 110, Section 290.156, Provision of Non-assurance Services to Audit Clientsputs restriction on the auditors that they cannot provide any non-audit services to the audit clients beyond the audit engagement letter as it can end up in the development of the threat of audit independence of self-review threat, advocacy threat and self-interest threat (apesb.org.au 2018). In the light of the above-discussed principle of APES, Emma Lawrence has breached the principle ofProvision of Non-assurance Services to Audit Clientsas per APES by providing variousnon-auditserviceslikebookkeepingservices, managementadvisory services and others (Knechel and Salterio 2016). Question 2 Situation 1 The prime responsibility of the auditors involves in the inspection of the financial statements of the companies in order to make sure they are free from material misstatements. In the lights of the principles of APES, it can be concluded that the given situation does not involve in the creation of audit independence threat. However, if Enid Blyton provides his assistance to
5AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES thecompanyintheselectionoftheconductor,theremaybethecreationoftheaudit independence threat as this aspect will be considered as providing the non-assurance services. Thus, it will createSelf-review,Self-interestandAdvocacythreat of audit independence (apesb.org.au 2018). Situation 2 As per the provided situation, there is a pressure on Jean Douglas from the CEO of Dooley’s to deliver favorable audit opinion by connecting the payment of audit fees on the audit performance.Forthisreason,therewillbethecreationofSelf-interestthreatofaudit independence in case he provides favorable audit opinion (Rezaeeet al.2018). On the other hand, the company is offering the auditor a free trip to Europe in case he ignores the material misstatement in inventory valuation causing from non-compliance with the required accounting standards. As perAPES 110, Section 260, Gifts and Hospitality, the auditors are restricted from accepting any gift, offer or hospitality from the clients. For this reason, there will be violation of APES principle and creation ofSelf-interestthereat of audit independence in case Jean Douglas ignores the material misstatements in inventory valuation by accepting the offers from the CEO (apesb.org.au 2018). Conclusion The above discussion indicates towards the fact that it is the obligation on the auditors to comply with all the regulations and standards ofAPESwhile conducting the audit operations. Non-compliance with these regulations can lead to the violation of audit principles and can develop various audit independence threat like self-interest threat, advocacy threat, self-review threat and others.
6AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES References Apesb.org.au. (2018).APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. [online] Available at: https://www.apesb.org.au/uploads/standards/apesb_standards/standard1.pdf [Accessed 7 Jun. 2018]. Chandler, R., 2014. Auditing and assurance.London School of Economics. London. Eilifsen, A., Messier, W.F., Glover, S.M. and Prawitt, D.F., 2013.Auditing and assurance services. McGraw-Hill. Knechel, W.R. and Salterio, S.E., 2016.Auditing: Assurance and risk. Taylor & Francis. Leung, P., Coram, P., Cooper, B.J. and Richardson, P., 2014.Modern Auditing and Assurance Services 6e. Wiley. Messier, W.F., Glover, S.M. and Prawitt, D.F., 2015.Auditing& Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach. Qing hua da xue chu ban she. Rezaee, Z., Sharbatoghlie, A., Elam, R. and McMickle, P.L., 2018. Continuous auditing: Building automated auditing capability. InContinuous Auditing: Theory and Application(pp. 169-190). Emerald Publishing Limited. William Jr, M., Glover, S. and Prawitt, D., 2016.Auditing and assurance services: A systematic approach. McGraw-Hill Education.